free web hosting | free hosting | Business Hosting Services | Free Website Submission | shopping cart | php hosting
Difficile est saturam non scribere

NOxVile's ONLY sources for uncensored news

IDIOT BOX WARS

WBCR 1470AM

Knoxville Tennessee
ET TU EL LOCO
PARENTIS
TOWING
BEACONS
STUDENT
RIGHTS
PARTY OF
THE VOLS
NOxVILLE
NO 1
BOOK LERNIN
WUTK CENSORED
MINI WAGE
PRO F'BALL
UNSOLVED
HISTORY
TACO
HELL
SCARABS SECRET SOCIETY
UT SECRET PROFIT SURPLUS
UTK HOSPITAL OWNED BY CANADA

STUDENT LOAN SHARKS
STUDENT LOAN BK
IN RE FORD 151 BR 135 BK MD TN 1993
11 USC 523

TOWING
TIMES
KNOXVILLE
CONFIDENTIAL
ORIGINAL
CRIMEBUSTERS
TOW STORIES
$30,000 PARKING TICKET
TOWING & PARKING PUBLIC RECORDS
CLASS ACTION REPORTER
BIG CLASS ACTION
LAWFUL
LINKS
GORDON LAW SCHOOL RADIO
KNOX PATRIOT NETWORK
KNOXVILLE CITY COURT & ORDINANCES
COURTS & LAWS
DRIVER
LINKS
AMERICAN
JUSTICE
POLY
TICKS
TOWING
CARTEL
GARBAGE
CARTEL
DOE WATCH
DOWNWINDERS
CHE OAK RIDGE
HAARP
ORNL HAARP
MODERN
MOBS
PRIVATE TOWING SCAMS
TOW
BITCH
TOWING
JOE DIRT
POETIC
INJUSTICE

XTREME
KNEWS
INFO WARS
WITNESS
FORM
MOTORIST
RIGHTS
MAXIMUM
TOW PRICE
PROSECUTION
CHECKLIST
TOWING
RECORDS
TOWING
LINKS
AMERICAN AUTOBAHN
PIRATE NEWS
PROHIBITION TIMES

TOURIST
TRAPS
DAILY AIR POLLUTION FORECAST
STOLEN CAR AUCTIONS BY MAYOR ASHE, KPD & MAFIAS
KNOXVILLE
HOOT
BIG
DEAL
ROAD
RAGE
TOURIST
BOYCOTT
EAST TN GOTHIC
HARDKNOX
$350 MIL
HABIJAIL
ACLU
COP CARD

LOCAL
KNEWS
WBCR ALCOA TN
1470AM
INFO WARS
AMERIKAN EXPOSE
POWER HOUR
IMPEACHED
MAYOR
BROADCAST
NEWS
KNOX
JOURNAL
$20M WELFARE
NEWS
CENSORED BANNED UNOFFICIAL NOxVILE GREEN PARTY
GREEN PARTY DWI JOKES
COOKEVILLE PIT

GOVERNMENT RACKETEERING AND ORGANIZED CRIME
COMPREHENSIVE ANNUAL FINANCIAL REPORTS
CAFR VIDEO
SECRETS OF BRITISH FEDERAL RESERVE
BRITISH FEDERAL RESERVE ON JEKYLL ISLAND
FEDERAL RESERVE ACT OF TREASON
FEDERAL RESERVE DOLLARS NOT CONSTITUTIONAL
MONOPOLY MEN
LIBERTY DOLLARS
LIBERTY BILL ACT
GOVERNMENTAL DEVIANCE
FEDERAL RESERVE VOO DOO
FEDERAL RESERVE FOOLS
FEDERAL RESERVE RUBBER CHECKS
VOLUNTARY IRS TAX CONTRIBUTION
GOVERNMENTAL DEVIANCE

WINNERS
WEB
DESIGN
WEBMASTER

Home I Maps I Weather I News Radio I MP3 Music I American Autobahn

Complete Smarties Guide to
Winning in Parking Court


Author: John Lee
Editor: G. O'Dalmitee
Illustrator: Mike L. Angelo
Binding: Silicon 99.9 pages
Publisher: Faction EBooks
Edition: 3rd Time Charm Published Date: TO/DA/Y!
Printed: Earthplanet
Cover photo: S. Marty Asse
ISDN: BR549000
List: US $99.99.99
Sale Today Only: $00.00



All secrets revealed. Dont touch that rat!

Unconstitutional parking tickets pave the road for the car-theft cartel

Knoxville Tennessee

This website is protected FREE SPEACH under the First Amendment and Fourteenth Amendment to the US Constitution as well as the Tennessee Constitution and Tennessee Open Records Act. By using these websites, you agree to waive all claims and hold these websites and its agents harmless for any liability as a result of reading any news article listed on this site or any errors or omissions in the information on this site. By accessing or using this site, you agree that the courts and laws of Tennessee govern and provide exclusive jurisdiction over any disputes that arise with the webmaster of these websites, and you agree to pay all costs and expenses accrued by webmaster to defend any such litigation. Visiting this site constitutes automatic ratification of this contract. This news cache is provided without profit for educational FAIR USE purposes under 17 US Code §107.


NOxVILE CONFIDENTIAL

by John Lee
LEE PARALEGAL INVESTIGATIONS &
WINNERS WEB DESIGN - Y2K TN COLLEGIATE STATE CHAMPS
WEBMASTER FOR AMERICANAUTOBAHN.COM AS SEEN AT A LEGAL 212MPH ON HISTORY CHANNEL

KNOXVILLE, TENNESSEE - This is the website that forced City of Knoxville Municpal Corporation to fire all its car-thieving towing contractors and file a class action against them to recover moneys defrauded from towcrime victims, and forced the District Attorney General to demand criminal indictments of government car thieves driving tow trucks, in November 2003. "Coincidentally", KPD police chief Phil Keith "resigned" within one month after John Lee briefed city council that KPD perps 125,000 annual felonies, just like city court clerk Michael Martin was fired one month after John Lee subpoenaed him to testify that KPD and city court keeps a Top Secret docket of its 125,000 annual "misdemeanor" citations. (NOTE: KPD may NOT make arrests for violations of city ordinances since KPD is NOT a "government law enforcement agency", and city court is NOT a "criminal" court and may NOT decide criminal cases).

"The most common crimes are vehicle burglaries and thefts. The plan will focus on traffic and parking control problems. Cadets have started an aggressive parking enforcement campaign that has already resulted in the issuing of over 600 parking citations per week. The city law department and city court are working together to develop a plan to target repeat offenders who do not pay their parking fines. Chief Keith said, 'The downtown revitalization movement continues to gain momentum.' Mayor Haslam said, 'With the police department leading the way, every city department is prepared to do its part.'"
—City of Knoxville Municpal Corporation, Press Release, "Knoxville Police Announce New Downtown Public Safety Plan," May 14, 2004

"Fleet Services also maintains the city's Vehicle Impoundment Lot on Vice Mayor Jack Sharp Rd. in East Knoxville. Approximately 6,000 vehicles a year are processed through this lot. Along with other surplus city equipment,vehicles and unclaimed impounded vehicles are sold at public auctions."
—City of Knoxville Municpal Corporation, Fleet Services Division

"Towing companies keep 40% of all cars towed in Knoxville and never return them to their owners."
—Michael McGovern, attorney-at-law and tow truck driver, editor of LegalEze at Tow Times magazine and "the world's best towing lawyer" who wrote the towing section of the FAAA Act for US Congress, son of Ben McGovern, co-owner of Cedar Bluff Towing with $40-Billion Mafia-convicted cartel Miller Industries and BFI, Knoxville City Council special session, defending all the fired city towing contractors and agreeing to Settlement Offer to victims of towcrime in vain attempt to divert a class action filed by city government and criminal charges filed by District Attorney General, Knoxville City Council, Special Session, 25 Nov 2003

"MEMORANDUM OPINION, shall not be published, and shall not be cited or relied on for any reason in a subsequent unrelated case.... Onks appeals from an order of the Circuit Court at Putnam County directing him to pay $315.00 plus interest to the City of Cookeville for twenty-one parking violations.... Jerry Burgess appealed from an order of the Circuit Court at Cookeville directing him to pay $1,815.00 plus interest for 121 parking violations.... Onks contended that all parking ordinances of the City of Cookeville were invalid and unconstitutional under Article 11, Section 8 of the Tennessee Constitution and under the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution because the city had reserved some parking spaces on city streets to citizens, entities, and government officials [specifically judges] while enforcing overtime parking violations against him.... Onks maintains that leasing or renting parking spaces on public streets to private individuals for a fee invalidates the City of Cookeville's parking ordinances, including Section 9-508, under the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment of the United States Constitution as well as guarantees provided under the Tennessee Constitution."
City of Cookeville v. Onks, 1993 WL 398472, Tenn.App.,1993., Oct. 1, 1993 (City of Cookville voluntarily dismissed its appeal to Tennessee Supreme Court to avoid setting a statewide legal precedent. As settlement, City of Cookville was forced to drop all claims against Burgess and Onks for unpaid parking tickets, and removed all parking meters in Cookville and provided all residents FREE PARKING. Now this legal defense against unconstitutional government needs to be fought in Knoxville!!! All you need is one parking ticket, then appeal to Tennessee Supreme Court...)


Towcrime Terrorism

"The term `domestic terrorism' means activities that involve acts dangerous to human life that are a violation of the criminal laws of the United States or of any State."
—Uniting and Strengthening America by Providing Appropriate Tools Required to Intercept and Obstruct Terrorism (U.S.A.P.A.T.R.I.O.T.) Act of 2001, 18 US Code 2331

"After my car broke down on the Interstate highway in Nashville, Tennessee, Metro police towed and impounded my car and issued me a parking citation for 'violating the Homeland Security Act'."
—Disgruntled Driver, WLAC 1510AM, Legally Speaking talk radio show, Saturday May 8, 2004

"Davidson County Sheriffs Department is NOT a law enforcement agency."
—Davidson County Sheriff's Department, Nashville, Tennessee, Nashville-Sheriff.net - Constitutional County Sheriff vs. Metro Corporate Police (Security Guards) FAQ

"Dumb cops, dumb cops, whatcha gonna do, whatcha going to do with a low IQ?"
—Jay Leno (comedic Italian-American, motorhead collector, biker gangster, and rider of a 266MPH street-legal jet-engined All-American sportbike), NBC TV, Tonight Show, WBIR TV, COMCAST/Scripps-Howard/ATT/Knoxville News-Sentinel Corporations

"As used in this part, unless the context otherwise requires:
     (1) "Act of terrorism" means an act or acts constituting a violation of this part, any other offense under the laws of Tennessee, or an act or acts constituting an offense in any other jurisdiction within or outside the territorial boundaries of the United States that contains all of the elements constituting a violation of this part or is otherwise an offense under the laws of such jurisdiction, that is intended, directly or indirectly, to:
     (A) Intimidate or coerce a civilian population;
     (B) Influence the policy of a unit of government by intimidation or coercion; or
     (C) Affect the conduct of a unit of government by murder, assassination, torture, kidnapping, or mass destruction;
—Tennessee Code 39-13-801, Terrorism Prevention and Response Act of 2002, TCA 39-13-803 - Part definitions, Lexis-Nexis at Michie.com, Findlaw.com

"You will be happy to learn that the former head of the KGB (the secret police of the former Soviet Union), General Yevgeni Primakov, has been hired as a consultant by the US Department of Homeland Security."
—Al Martin, AlMartinRaw.com, "Get Ready for the USSA (The United Soviet States of America)," March 17, 2003

"SUMMARY: Creates crime of terrorism. Punishes by life imprisonment.
SECTION 1.
     (1) A person commits the crime of terrorism if the person knowingly plans, participates in or carries out any act that is intended, by at least one of its participants, to disrupt:
     (a) The free and orderly assembly of the inhabitants of the State of Oregon;
     (b) Commerce or the transportation systems of the State of Oregon; or
     (c) The educational or governmental institutions of the State of Oregon or its inhabitants.
     (2) A person commits the crime of terrorism if the person conspires to do any of the activities described in subsection (1) of this section.
     (4) (a) A person convicted of terrorism shall be punished by imprisonment for life. (b) When a person is convicted of terrorism under this section, the court shall order that the person be confined for a minimum of 25 years without possibility of parole, release to post-prison supervision, release on work release or any form of temporary leave or employment at a forest or work camp."
SECTION 3.
     Section 19, chapter 666, Oregon Laws 2001, as amended by section 5, chapter 696, Oregon Laws 2001, is amended to read:
     The crimes to which section 1 (11)(b), chapter 666, Oregon Laws 2001, applies are:

(1) Bribe giving
(7) Official misconduct in the first degree
(17) Theft
(24) Unauthorized use of a vehicle
(26) Laundering a monetary instrument
(27) Engaging in a financial transaction in property derived from unlawful activity
(28) Burglary
(31) Unlawful entry into a motor vehicle
(34) Computer crime
(39) Unlawful recording of a live performance
(44) Forgery
(50) Fraudulently obtaining a signature
(51) Fraudulent use of a credit card
(52) Negotiating a bad check
(55) Falsifying business records
(59) Issuing a false financial statement
(65) Identity theft
(69) Unlawful possession of a firearm
(99) Cheating
(123) Misuse of an identification card
(124) Unlawful production of identification cards, licenses, permits, forms or camera cards
(126) Using an invalid license
(129) Criminal driving while suspended or revoked
(130) Driving while under the influence of intoxicants
(132) Terrorism, as defined in section 1 of this 2003 Act
—72nd OREGON LEGISLATIVE ASSEMBLY--2003 Regular Session, Senate Bill 742, amendment to Chapter 666, Oregon Laws 2001, Rense.com, "Oregon Bill Gives Protestors LIFE In Prison In Forest Work Camp - Reclassifies ALL Crimes as 'Terrorism'"

"For FBI agents in Las Vegas in 'Operation G-String', cases don't get any juicier. Earlier this year the Feds were closing in on Michael Galardi, the city's biggest strip-club baron, who was suspected of bribing local officials. Facing prosecution, Galardi cut a deal and confessed to funneling hundreds of thousands of dollars to Clark County commissioners. Galardi told agents that he gave one official $20,000 to help buy a new SUV; another received $400 worth of lap dances at one of his clubs. In Las Vegas, the Feds used a little-known provision in the Patriot Act that allows them to quickly obtain financial records of suspected terrorists or money launderers. Law-enforcement agencies can submit the name of any suspect to the Treasury Department, which then orders financial institutions across the country to search their records for any matches. If they get a 'hit'óevidence that the person has an accountóthe financial institution is slapped with a subpoena for the person's records. But it's such a broad statute that prosecutors can use it in the pursuit of more than 200 different federal crimes. Treasury Department figures reviewed by NEWSWEEK show that this year the Feds have used the U.S.A.P.A.T.R.I.O.T. Act to conduct searches on 962 suspects, yielding 'hits' on 6,397 financial records. Of those, two thirds (4,261) were in money-laundering cases with no apparent terror connection."
—Newsweek and MSNBC, "Show Me the Money - U.S.A.P.A.T.R.I.O.T. Act helps the Feds in cases with no tie to terror," December 1, 2003

"An evil exists that threatens every man, woman, and child of this great nation. We must take steps to ensure our domestic security and protect our Homeland."
Adolf Hitler Shicklegruber, the democratically elected Chancellor of Germany, declaring the creation of the GESTAPO (Geheime Staats Politizei) in NAZI Germany, who seized dictatorial power and banned firearms from his fellow Jews and Germans via the Enabling Laws, after he arsoned Germany's Reichstag parliament building (the "Reichstag Fire"), to "justify" false arrest and execution of his political enemies, and to invade Europe, and to enslave and/or genocide ALL the citizens under his control

"The First U.S.A.P.A.T.R.I.O.T. Act passed in October of 2001 defines terrorism as any misdemeanor. Now this supplemental legislation, 'The Terrorist Penalties Enhancement Act' (HR 2934) will allow the government to kill you for the crime of terrorism. The ACLU also noted that the proposal could actually hurt the anti-terror efforts. Many nations that have abolished the death penalty are unwilling to extradite or provide evidence in federal terrorism cases if the death penalty might result from their cooperation. Suicidal, politically motivated terrorists such as members of Al Qaeda would be unaffected as often they are seeking to create martyrs for their causes and to generate publicity. Bush has been traveling the country telling the American people that they had better expand the Patriot Act or that the terrorists will 'get them.' His statements in themselves are, by definition:

terrorism: the systematic use of terror especially as a means of coercion : the use of or the threatened use of violent action by a group or individual to coerce another group or individual to submit to their demands.
—Infowars.com, "U.S.A.P.A.T.R.I.O.T. Act Enhancement Provides Death Penalty For Any Federal Crime Punishable By Over One Year In Jail," April 27, 2004

"You have been tried by twelve good men and true, not of your peers but as high above you as heaven is of hell, and they have said you are guilty. Time will pass and seasons will come and go. Spring with its wavin' green grass and heaps of sweet-smellin' flowers on every hill and in every dale. Then sultry Summer, with her shimmerin' heat-waves on the baked horizon. And Fall, with her yeller harvest moon and the hills growin' brown and golden under a sinkin' sun. And finally Winter, with its bitin', whinin' wind, and all the land will be mantled with snow. But you won't be here to see any of 'em; not by a damn sight, because it's the order of this court that you be took to the nearest tree and hanged by the neck til you're dead, dead, dead, you olive-colored son of a billy goat."
Hangin' Judge Roy Bean, at his own saloon/courtroom/casino/jail/gallows in Pecos County, Texas in 1800s, during the trial and sentencing of a cattle russler and horse theif - the equivalent of car theft today, (as seen on the History Channel and acted by Paul Newman)

"I sure learned a lot today."
–Knoxville City Court Judge John Rosson, after his court administrator Michael Martin was subpoenaed to testify in City of Knoxville vs John Lee, January 2001. Martin testified that he and his court clerk's office did NOT maintain the legally required docket for tracking ALL cases, including 75,000 annual parking tickets, plus an additional 50,000 traffic/misdemeanor citations, and did NOT have any idea how many parking tickets are filed nor how much profit is made. KPD Bailiff Sergeant Wayne Bell was also subpoenaed to testify, but he refused to open his mouth during the oath and was forced to swear the oath a second time, this time promising to tell the truth. This million-dollar parking ticket case was won 2.5 years later by the pro se webmaster on appeal to Knox County Circuit Court.

"Knoxville Court Adminstrator Michael Martin was placed on administrative leave pending an investigation into allegations he collected portions of his employees' bonus checks last year, records show. The allegations surfaced last week and Martin was placed on paid leave Thursday, records show. The Knoxville Police Department's Internal Affairs Unit is conducting a probe into the allegations. Knoxville City Court Judge John Rosson said he placed Martin on administrative leave after being informed of the alleged conduct by city Law Director Michael Kelley. In a Feb. 1 letter to Rosson, Kelley noted he had interviewed a City Court employee who raised the allegation. After years of neglect outlined by an audit of City Court, an interim court administrator has begun to impose order on a court office that was in chaos. Knoxville's City Court has been a rambling wreck with no checks or balances on tickets issued, more than $80,000 in checks, cash and money orders in an unsecured file cabinet, no record of parking tickets and few efforts to collect more than $1 million in unpaid fees. In a filing cabinet called "Roxanne" by employees at City Court lie thousands of dollars paid for traffic and parking offenses that have not been properly logged or deposited in a bank, notes a report on court operations. Knoxville City Court Administrator Michael Martin resigned Monday on the heels of allegations he collected a thousand dollars by pressuring his employees to share their annual bonuses with him. Martin's resignation came just minutes before he was scheduled to meet with City Court Judge John Rosson for a pre-disciplinary hearing. Rosson said he planned to fire Martin, but NOT because of the bonus scheme."
—Knoxville News-Sentinel, "Bonus check splitting alleged", February 6, 2001, et al., (1 month after Martin was subpoenaed by pro se webmaster John Lee to testify in City Court trial, City of Knoxville Municipal Corporation v. John Lee, testifying that City Court does not maintain the legally required docket of its 75,000 annual parking citations. In the 2001 Comprehensive Annual Financial Report (CAFR) of Knoxville Inc.'s $2.1-Billion profit surplus, its pension fund for its City judge increased by $1.2-Million)

Republican mayor and Republican sheriff want to defraud taxpayers of over $100-million to abandon palatial City County Building and build a supemax office complex and dungeon. Mayor already abandoned his jail cells at KPD Safety Building and replaced them with a maximum security museum. Sheriff reportedly caught building 400 houses with his convicted-felon business partner without a license - Sales commission as general manager of the government construction contract would routinely total 30% of total cost of project which is over $30-Million salary. Sheriff was also caught renting an airport from a convicted drug kingpin in 2002

"It looks like a damn Habitrail with Rocky Top playing in the background. The people who designed it must be frigging brain dead—turning downtown into a theme park mall for Stepford Childs. Call in Disney and hoist the Mouse's Ears. The taxpayers will be paying for this fiasco for generations to come. It will never recover. Knoxville must be the most corrupt city on earth. People worry about the national government, but it's the local government people need to fear. Thanks to the debt from the mayor's downtown renovation schemes, this town will be bankrupt for generations to come. It will never recover."
—City Councilmember Carlene Malone to John Lee, discussing Skull & Bones mayor Victor Ashe's Billion-dollar welfare for Scripps-Howard's Universe Knoxville and arson of her 2 cars during Wrecker Commission hearings against Knoxville's Mafia-connected towing and garbage cartels, and before suing Mayor Ashe and his Wrecker-Inspected Beer Board

"The night it all came down I could not stop shivering. It changed the way I viewed a lot of things. For the first time, sitting on Council, I really felt I was in the prescense of evil. I had disagreed with people on many occasions and felt strongly about many things, but I never ever had felt something I could describe as the presence of evil. Until that night. There was just darkness. Hopelessness. But never, until Danny's death and the appointment of someone other than his wife, and knowing the orchestration that took place to make it happen, did I realize that I could never again go back to that body without carrying with me my belief that they were capable of the worst possible actions."
—City Councilmember Carlene Malone, MS (psychology), regarding "voter impeachment" (recall) in 2001 of then-mayor Victor Ashe (now ambassador to Poland for his college roommate and fellow cheerleader George Bush Jr. in homosexual Skull & Bones Senior Secret Society at all-male Yale University), and her last week in office, Metro Pulse, "Malone Alone", December 13, 2001

"Other members acted out the tableau of a throat-cutting ritual murder. Yes, the death mantra - here it is, the three-line Skull and Bones initiation-ritual theme that has bound three Presidents (including the present one) to their secret society:
     'THE HANGMAN EQUALS DEATH!
     THE DEVIL EQUALS DEATH!
     DEATH EQUALS DEATH!'"

—Ron Rosenbaum, New York Observer, "At Skull and Bones, Bush's Secret Club Initiates Ream Gore," page 1, 4/23/01

"The intruders discovered one room adorned with nothing but Nazi paraphernalia."
—Ron Rosenbaum, Esquire Magazine, "The Last Secrets of Skull & Bones", September 1977

"Skull and Bones: The rituals of Yale's legendary secret societies continue to this day, and some individuals have managed to spy on one of them. ABCNEWS' Dan Harris reports." Screaming girl: "Please don't kill me! Please don't kill me!"
ABC News undercover video by Ron Rosenbaum of New Yorker Magazine in 2001. Watch Georges Bush et al slit throats of screaming women with blood spurting out on national TV. It does NOT sound like any scream heard in Hollywood... (backup copy of partial videotape) Confessed S&B coffin weddings in SecretsOfTheTomb.com and censored interview with the author Alexandra Robbins on MSNBC. 1.5-hour video interview of Anthony Sutton on Skull and Bones and Wall Street trial lawyer bankster Prescott Bush's 3 arrests and $750,000 criminal forfeiture for funding Jew Adolf Hitler Schicklegruber Rothschild and his genocidal NAZI war machine DURING World War 2

"If this were a dictatorship, it'd be a heck of a lot easier, just so long as I'm the dictator."
—President-select George "Texascutioner" Bush Jr., 5-time-convicted felon and wartime draft deserter, convicted warcriminal, who was sued under RICO Act for perping organized crime and cop-killing terrorist massacres on September 11, 2001 filed by families of victims, CNN News, Aired December 18, 2000

"CONSPIRACY- A person who conspires to commit an offense under this section shall be subject to the same penalties (other than the penalty of death) as the penalties prescribed for the offense, the commission of which was the object of the conspiracy."
—Uniting and Strengthening America by Providing Appropriate Tools Required to Intercept and Obstruct Terrorism (U.S.A.P.A.T.R.I.O.T. ACT) Act of 2001, SEC. 802. DEFINITION OF DOMESTIC TERRORISM (H.R.3162)

"'Enterprise' means any individual, sole proprietorship, partnership, corporation, business trust, union chartered under the laws of this state, or other legal entity, or any unchartered union, association or group of individuals associated in fact although not a legal entity, and it includes illicit as well as licit enterprises, AND GOVERNMENTAL, as well as other, entities."
—Racketeer and Corrupt Organizations Act (RICO), TN CODE 39-12-203 (state RICO Act), at Findlaw.com and Lexis-Nexis, and US CODE TITLE 18, PART I, CHAPTER 96, Sec. 1961 (federal RICO Act)

"Operation NORTHWOODS may be the most corrupt plan ever created by the U.S. government. Operation Northwoods had called for nothing less than the launch of a secret campaign of terrorism within the United States in order to blame Castro and provoke a war with Cuba."
—James Bamford, author of Body of Secrets - History of the National Security Agency (published April 2001), quoted by David Ruppe, ABC News, "Friendly Fire - U.S. Military Drafted Plans to Terrorize U.S. Cities to Provoke War With Cuba," May 1, 2001

"In the early 1960s, America's top military leaders reportedly drafted plans to kill innocent people and commit acts of terrorism in U.S. cities to create public support for a war against Cuba. Code named Operation NORTHWOODS, the plans reportedly included the possible assassination of Cuban ÈmigrÈs, sinking boats of Cuban refugees on the high seas, hijacking planes, blowing up a U.S. ship, and even orchestrating violent terrorism in U.S. cities. The plans were developed as ways to trick the American public and the international community into supporting a war to oust Cuba's then new leader, communist Fidel Castro. The plans had the written approval of all of the Joint Chiefs of Staff and were presented to President Kennedy's defense secretary, Robert McNamara, in March 1962. But they apparently were rejected by the civilian leadership and have gone undisclosed for nearly 40 years. Ironically, the documents came to light, says Bamford, in part because of the 1992 Oliver Stone film JFK, which examined the possibility of a conspiracy behind the assassination of President Kennedy. As public interest in the assassination swelled after JFK's release, Congress passed a law designed to increase the public's access to government records related to the assassination. The author says a friend on the board tipped him off to the documents."
—David Ruppe, ABC News, "Friendly Fire - U.S. Military Drafted Plans to Terrorize U.S. Cities to Provoke War With Cuba," May 1, 2001

"On the morning of September 11th 2001, Mr. Fulton and his team at the CIA were running a pre-planned simulation to explore the emergency response issues that would be created if a plane were to strike a building."
National Law Enforcement and Security Institute, NLSI.NET, TheMemoryHole.org, "On 9/11, CIA Was Running Simulation of a Plane Crashing into a Building"

KNOXVILLE TENNESSEE 9-11-2003 - Arab rug weaver Randy Vaden arranges the covering at the base of his SEPTEMBER 11 MEMORIAL at REJENNINGS.COM. Vaden spent five months on the memorial that paid him $150,000. The piece includes 3,017 wind chimes (56 different tones = 5+6=11) to represent all who died Sept 11, including a police dog (alleged Arab hijackers' names are presumably missing since they are still alive). Their names have been laser-etched into the granite. Vaden hopes that this project will open doors for him to build others. "My goal is to have a memorial similar to this in the field in Pennsylvania," he said, where President Bush jr ordered the US Air Force to shoot down United Airlines Flight 93 (resulting in Pennsylvania governor Tom "Vietnam War Criminal" Ridge's hush-money promotion to Homeland Security director). "That would be the icing on the cake." The 6,000 pound (6,666?) black granite obilisk from India was dedicated at a ceremony Thursday at the City County building. The ceremony began at noon and included speeches from newly created "County Mayor" Mike Ragsdale and City Law Director Michael Kelly, who brought greetings on behalf of Skull and Boner Knoxville Mayor Victor "Victoria" Ashe (romantically linked to George Bush Jr - Trial lawyer Ashe's trial lawyers quashed this webmaster's subpoena in Knox County Circuit Court and turned down an invitation to deny his homosexual love affair). Photos and articles by Satanic human sacrifice Bohemian Grove and snuff kiddie porn (says GOP Senator John DeCamp) Scripps Howard COMCAST ATT Knoxville News Sentinel media cartel. Egyptian obilisks dedicated to Egyptian god Osiris represent Satan's penis, and black represents assassination and human sacrifice to the gods of evil. WBIR TV video stream. After two years and two wars costing taxpayers over $200-Billion, not one single person was arrested, prosecuted, convicted or fired for perpetrating the 9-11 massacre - all we got was these creepy dumbed-down memorials like NewYorkAcropolis.org. Knoxville's Museum of East Tennessee History is also site to the first and only exhibit for WTC 911 Demolition Debris operated by the Smithsonian Museum HQ from Washington DC

"KNOXVILLE, TENN - The ruins of the Oklahoma City federal building, ripped open by a bomb and left tottering precariously until the dead were removed, are etched in the American mind. When the signal finally came to destroy the remains of the building, a UTK alumnus' company did the job. Controlled Demolition Inc. collapsed the Murrah Building with less than 100 pounds of dynamite placed strategically at 200 points in the superstructure. The job was typical of the delicate, dangerous work Mark Loizeaux (Knoxville '71), his brother Doug, and their father, John D., do. The company is headquartered in Phoenix, Maryland. The federal building demolition was more dangerous than most of Controlled Demolition's jobs because the remains were so unstable. The company's workers partially rebuilt some areas of the building to help control the collapse. And unlike the April 19 bomb blast that shattered windows a mile away, the demolition operation barely vibrated nearby buildings. John D. founded CDI in the late 1940s. In 1960, at age 11, Mark began learning the business from his father and eight years later became the nation's youngest blaster. When John D. was injured in an accident, 18-year-old Mark interrupted his pursuit of an architecture degree at UTK and returned home to run the family business. After his father recovered, Mark re-enrolled, this time majoring in business. Soon after he graduated, he became president of CDI. Mark supervises the company's contracts, insurance, and engineering and takes charge of some field operations. His brother, Doug, is vice president responsible for field operations and personnel. He personally packed explosives in the Oklahoma City federal building. Stacey Loizeaux, Mark's daughter, is a licensed blaster and frequently a project manager. She was born in Knoxville while her dad attended UTK. CDI has brought down many well known structures including the Dunes Hotel in Las Vegas and the Andrew Jackson in Nashville. The Sheikh A. Akakl Center in Saudi Arabia, part of which collapsed during construction, was another of CDI's big blows. A company brochure says CDI brought down the remainder of the building without damaging facilities just two feet away on two sides."
—Bob Gilbert, University of Tennessee, Tennessee Alumnus magazine, "Good Out Of Evil - An alumna in Oklahoma City says the federal building bombing, though a heinous act, prompted an outpouring of caring," Fall 1995 (As seen regularly on the History Channel - Modern Marvels: Demolition hosted by Alice "Welcome to My Nightmare" Cooper)

"I remember getting a call from the, er, fire department commander, telling me that they were not sure they were gonna be able to contain the fire, and I said, 'We've had such terrible loss of life, maybe the smartest thing to do is pull it.' And they made that decision to pull and we watched the building collapse."
—Larry Silverstein, leasehold owner of WTC, who made a double-dip insurance claim for $7-Billion on a WTC that only cost $1-Billion to build, AND IN ADDITION TO the $7-Billion government contract to Knoxville's HQ for 20,000 tow-trucks and garbage trucks owned by Miller Industries / BFI and Controlled Demolitions Incorporated (CDI) to explode/demolish the entire WTC complex, Jeremy Baker, INFOWARS.COM Radio with Alex Jones, WBCR 1470AM Alcoa, TN, "PBS TV Documentary: Silverstein, FDNY Confess WTC 7 Razed with Controlled Demolitions on 9-11-2001," January 19, 2004

"The RICO (Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act) action lawsuit against President Bush and other high level members of his administration is based upon prior knowledge of 9/11; knowingly failing to act, prevent or warn of 9/11; and the ongoing obstruction of justice by covering up the truth of 9/11; all in violation of the laws of the United States."
—Philip Berg, attorney-at-law and former prosecutor in U.S. Attorney General's office, 911ForTheTruth.com, Geocities.com/ForTheTruth911, Press Release re Mariani v. Bush et al.


Criminal Investigation Caught on Videotape

Location: Sutherland Avenue Wrecker Service
(a/k/a Moon's Wrecker Service (not a registered corporation), a/k/a Moon's Used Parts (registered "Dismantler/Recycler" chop shop, not a registered corporation), "Moons" as in "Moonshine"?)
July 15, 2003 [provisional transcript]


John Lee: I'm here to pick up my Volvo.

Yvonne Mullins: Okay, on the Volvo, that will be $1,573.93.

JL: Excuse me?

YM: That's the bill, today, on the Volvo.

JL: Who's paying that?

YM: You are.

JL: Where's my contract with you, that I signed to agree to that?

YM: It was on private property, and it was towed away.

JL: And where's the name of the person who had it towed away?

YM: I don't know.

JL: You don't have a name of a person?

YM: [No]

JL: Give me the name of the person who towed away my car.

YM: [No]

JL: Are you're refusing to give me the name of the person who towed away my car?

YM: [Why would I give you that name?]

JL: That's a pretty dumb question, isn't it?

YM: [No reply]

JL: So you are refusing to tell me who towed the car?

YM: I've been through this game with you before [on the Honda Accord], I'm not going there again.

JL: You are refusing to let me have my car, with no contract?

YM: [No reply]

JL: Did Carmax tell you to tow it?

YM: Yes, they did.

JL: Then send the bill to them. If so, they have the contract with you, not me.

YM: [No reply]

JL: Carmax told me they did not have the car towed. They told me they did not have it towed. There is nobody in that dealership that said they had it towed.

YM: [They did.]

JL: So you towed this car without any authorization whatsoever, from anybody?

JL: But you are refusing to give that to me, which means there is nobody.

YM: [CARMAX called for a tow.]

JL: They are denying that, so it's your word against theirs. Are you trying to extort me into paying you a debt I do not owe?

YM: What I'm trying to do is… I don't have to answer any questions. I'm not going to…

JL: So you are telling me you burglerized my car, then you stole my car, and now you want me to enter into a contract with you, so you won't go to jail, is that correct?

YM: I'm not going to jail.

JL: There's a lot of people going to jail this time.

JL: I showed up here a few days ago to pick up my car, and nobody would even give me any paperwork. Where's the notice that you mailed to me saying that you towed my car?

YM: It's in that pack right there.

JL: May I see it?

YM: No.

JL: No? Because it doesn't exist, does it? You have never mailed me any notice that you have this car. Now what's wrong with my title? Why can I not get my title at the DMV? Why is that?

YM: [I don't know?]

JL: Why do they say that Sutherland Avenue has a lien on this car?

YM: Because that's where I sent the information, all the information I had on the car. We put a lien on it until you pay that bill.

JL: Well, who is the person who contacted the title clerk's office?

YM: I don't contact that title clerk. I do that straight through the State of Tennessee.

JL: And what address is that? Who did you speak with down there?

YM: I don't know. They send me the forms. I send them the forms.

JL: And may I see that form?

YM: No.

JL: You won't give me any paperwork for my car?

YM: No.

JL: How can you say that's an honest business move?

YM: [It's my money.]

JL: I looks like we're going to the grand jury. And citizen's arrest is coming up.

YM: If you are not going to pick up your car, then you need to go on out.

JL: So you have stolen my car?!

YM: You can talk to our lawyer. You can speak to our lawyer. I'm not going…

JL: Are you going to give us that name, or is that top-secret, too?

YM: I'll be glad to - Billy Stokes.

(YM handed JL a note naming "Billy Stokes" as accessory to SAWS felony car theft and fraud)

JL: So you are confessing that you stole my car? So you are refusing me all paperwork on my car?

(YM ran out of the room to the back of SAWS' building, presumably to avoid a citizen's arrest. Essentially the same crimes later occurred at the law office of Stokes & Rutherford, with Billy Stokes, and all other lawyers and agents, refusing to respond to repeated requests to negotiate the return of either one of two stolen vehicles (a "pattern of racketeering activity"), as is their right to remain silent from self-incrimination from criminal prosecution, under the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments to the US Constitution, and the Tennessee Constitution.)


Battle of the Letterheads

"Dear Mr. Lee: I am not under investigation for any criminal acts. I have never been investigated for laundering car titles. In fact, I can say without hesitation that I have never laundered a car title. Accordingly, the information on your website is not just deceptive and misleading, it is an outright lie. I will take whatever actions I must to protect my reputation. As a 'public figure', I know I have a higher burden. However, an outright lie is definitely a reckless disregard for the truth. If you leave the website up after this letter, then I will know that you likewise have a malicious intent. I don't have the time or inclination to pusue such matters. However, as indicated herein, I will not let someone call me a thief or a criminal without rebuttal. I urge you to take this into consideration."
—"Billy" J. Stokes, attorney-at-law, Stokes, Rutherford, Williams, Sharp and Davies, 920 Volunteer Landing Lane, Suite 100, Knoxville, Tennessee 37915, 865-544-3833. March 19, 2004

"A 'con man', a 'confidence man', is the best-dressed, the best-spoken. He has to be since his intention is to separate you from your money, from your freedom. This is his 'M.O.' - his modus operandi. Our representatives in Washington DC remind me of the best conmen. This is a lesson we all have to learn."
—Detective Frank Serpico, NYPD, ThePowerHour.com, GCN Radio Network, GCNlive.com, WBCR 1470AM (Alcoa, Tennessee), 2002

"To Billy Stokes; Thank you for your correspondence. I have been eagerly awaiting your reply. As a candidate for the Tennessee State legislature, I'm sure you take a keen interest an issue of importance to each and every one of your potential constituants, namely, car theft. It has been over six months since I personally walked into your office and requested to speak with you, or to speak with any other lawyer or paralegal in your office, regarding why your client attempted to steal the title to my vehicle (1984 Volvo, retail value of $3,500). Your assistant advised me that neither you nor your associates would speak with me, nor correspond with me regarding this crime. Your decision to waiver your right to explain to me the criminal and fraudulent acts of your client, Sutherland Avenue Wrecker Service ("SAWS"), was deemed ratification-by-default of your client's illegal acts, in your capacity as agent for your client (and thus aiding and abeting those crimes, which carries the same penalty under law as perpetration of those acts). Apparently, if it were not for the news reported on my website, you would never have consented to contact me. Since you and your associates represented SAWS in Federal Court as a defendant in my prior case, I presume that SAWS was truthful in identifying you as its agent in this new matter. SAWS, your client, and Tennessee Department of Safety are the entities accusing you (as SAWS' agent), of 'laundering motor vehicle titles'. Has your client been less than forthright with you regarding your contract for Power of Attorney-in-Fact? If you are denying the assertions, accusations, admissions, and confessions made by your client, immediately send me details from your files, and your written testimony (sworn under penalty of perjury), regarding details and copies of all work that you and your associates performed for your client, SAWS, including 'title work'. Please explain why you refused to advise your client to return my stolen vehicles, (nor to provide me any invoice for alleged contract invoice for nonconsentual 'services'), which are still in illegal possession of your client (a Class D felony)? To the best of my knowledge and belief, SAWS is currently named as a defendant in a class action filed by plaintiff City of Knoxville Municipal Corporation, in Knox County Chancery Court, as reported extensively in newspapers, in TN news, and by elected officials in Knoxville City Council, as broadcast on TV. SAWS was subsequently barred from future government contracts by that plaintiff. In 2003, while on public television broadcast, the former mayor of Knoxville, his law director, and city council described SAWS' fraudulent actions as potentially meeting the criminal definition of "pattern of racketeering activity". While on public television broadcast, the district attorney general requested that victims of these crimes file affidavits of probable cause for criminal complaint with the AG office, or with other law enforcement or judicial agencies. According to my present information and belief, the following news reported on my website is factually accurate. According to my present information and belief, the following news reported on my website is factually accurate. To rebut the accusations made by your client SAWS, please include a written response to me, from you personally, signed by you under penalty of perjury, regarding your information and belief on each of the following issues of fact, as named in the email to you from "Tyler Harber" (quoted or edited from published reports and open public records by Knoxville News-Sentinel, Knoxville Journal, WBIR, WATE, Knoxville City Council, Knoxville Wrecker Commission, Knoxville Police Department, Knoxville mayor Victor Ashe, Knoxville City Court Judge John Rossen, Knox County Sheriff Tim Hutchinson, Knox County District Attorney General 'Randy' Nichols, Knox County Circuit Court, Tennessee Department of Safety, Federal District Court Eastern District in Knoxville, and edited and reposted on my website. After my receipt of your sworn testimony, and copies of your client's files, I shall reappraise my information and belief regarding your involvement, or lack thereof, in the criminal activities of your client, SAWS. After you have complied with my request, I shall decide whether to edit my website regarding your alleged legal actions performed against me on behalf of your criminal client, SAWS (who has accused you of these crimes). Since I am not the district attorney general, I am not authorized the make promises of immunity from criminal prosecution, as condition for testifying as witness against your client SAWS and associates, nor may I offer immunity from civil prosecution by Tennessee Bar Association Corporation, Board of Professional Responsibility, Tennessee Supreme Court. You may, of course, sue me for libel, in which case you may waiver your Fifth Amendment right to silence from self-incrimination and testify regarding the truth of the included facts, under penalties of perjury and criminal contempt of court. I am also prepared to countersue for all compensatory and punitive damages, and legal expenses. My actual financial damages are very large at the present time, due to the continued illegal actions of your client, SAWS. Good luck with your political career. I look forward to your continued cooperation in this matter."
—John D. Lee II, Prosecutor/Victim/Witness/Plaintiff


Towcrime Lawyer Politician Censors Internet

"I checked to see that you took down the information on your website regarding me. You did not, and in fact, expanded upon the outright lies you have told about me. Accordingly, I reported the contents of your site to Geocities. I am glad they took it down. I will not tolerate your lying abut me. Please be advised that if this information comes back up on the internet or anywhere else, I will take appropriate legal actions against you."
—Billy J. Stokes, attorney at law, former head of Knox County Republican Party Corporation, Republican Corporation candidate for Tennessee state legislature in 2004, Stokes & Rutherford, "Letter to John Lee", April 28, 2004


TO: Yahoo Geocities Webhosting
FROM: John Lee, webmaster, Geocities.com/towcrime
RE: Rebuttal Notice of Censorship of Website as Punishment for Testifying to City Council

Today's Date: April 29, 2004

Thank you for your free webhosting service. As a disabled American with "Gulf War Syndrome", who is unemployed and fighting for 5 years to get paid disability insurance from our government, I certainly do appreciate your free service. Otherwise, I would be unable to afford webhosting, which I use to report news on legal matters from around the world, including reporting on local court cases.

My website includes a cache of news archives, similar to the cache of archives posted online by Google.com's search engine, which automatically makes backup copies of every website in the world. Websites are copyright free for non-profit educational purposes, under 17 US Code 107.

My website is used as a research tool for local newspaper and TV reporters, regarding the legal issues I posted on my website about towing and wrecker services, and their fraud of government contracts and their abuse of local citizens. As a result of my website (and your webhosting), nearly 100 news articles have been published in the local newspaper and broadcast on TV news (daily for the past two weeks), city council has been forced to hold public hearings and rewrite its ordinances, and lawsuits have been filed in local courts.

I got a letter today, dated 28 April 2004, from a "Billy" Stokes, a candidate for the Tennessee state legislature in 2004, bragging that he successfully convinced you to censor my website at Geocities.com/towcrime. "I am glad they took it down," he wrote.

This letter from "Billy" Stokes was written one day after I spoke publicly in Knoxville City Council in Tennessee, naming my website, and handed each member of City Council the full text of my speech, including the link to my website. My entire 10-minute speech to city council was broadcast live on local Community Access TV, as part of the city council meeting.

My public speech and written report to the mayor and city council made it a part of the public record. From a legal point of view, this makes my statements of fact immune from prosecution for allegations of libel or slander, under the First Amendment and 14th Amendment to the US Constitution, since it essential to our government for citizens (and elected representatives) to petition the government for redress of grievances, and to enact new legislation, and to enforce existing legislation. My statements are now an official part of the minutes and transcript of that government hearing.

"Billy" Stokes was also one of the trial lawyers defending a small corporation (a government contractor) that I was suing in federal court, in a class action for car theft of my vehicle, and theft of 1,000s of other vehicles. His client, a tow truck company, still has my vehicle, which I am currently prosecuting for the criminal felony of car theft. Stokes is named in public court records as the lawyer for that company, and his law firm appeared in court to argue that case and to write court pleadings. This is an open public record. My car, a Honda Accord, had a retail value of $5,500. It was legally parked on my own private property, and no parking ticket was sued against me. Both the government police and the towing company denied towing or possessing my car, so I reported it to police as "STOLEN". Two months later, "Billy" Stokes' client sent me a towing bill for $750. Like most people, I cannot afford to tolerate any thief stealing my car, nor can I afford to donate my car to any corporation. My website discussed this lawsuit, and quoted verbatum from that court record. It named "Billy" Stokes as the attorney of record for some of the defendants in that case. and his clients did not "win" that case, and it is still a matter for the civil and criminal courts to decide.

Then last year, "Billy" Stokes' client, the tow truck company, stole a second vehicle from me, a Volvo Turbo, with a retail value of $3,500. Again, his client initially denied that it towed or possessed my car. In fact, it never notified me that it towed my car. After an investigation, I located my stolen car, and was told by "Billy" Stokes' client that I owed them $1,500 for the tow, which they refused to provide me with any written bill nor invoice for that fraudulent debt. This is the legal definition of felony car theft. This car thief refused to return my car, and told me that if I didn't like that crime, I should speak with their lawyer, "Billy" Stokes.

When I went to talk with "Billy" Stokes, he refused to speak with me, and refused to allow any member of his law office to speak to me. He refused to provide me with a bill or invoice from his client, as proof of my alleged debt of $1,500.

"Billy" Stokes never contacted me for nine months, UNTIL I PUT HIS NAME ON MY WEBSITE AT GEOCITIES.COM. I did modify my webpage to quote his verbatum written threats and extortion, and I modified my editorial to reflect this slight change in facts and issues.

So you can say that your webhosting at least provoked a "response" from him, even if it is only theatening letters of criminal extortion to force me to censor my website, or risk him suing me in court. Frankly, I welcome him suing me in civil court, because then the court will force him to testify about the felonious crimes perpetrated by his clients at the towing company, and about his law firm's aiding and abetting felony car thefts and racketeering.

As a result of my federal class actions and Affidavits of Probable Cause for Criminal Complaints that I filed against "Billy" Stokes and his clients, the city government of Knoxville cancelled his client's government contracts, and banned them for five years from bidding on future contracts. The city government then sued "Billy" Stokes' clients in state court, in a class action for fraud. City council declared on TV that "Billy" Stokes' clients should be prosecuted under the RICO Act for racketeering and organzed crime. The District Attorney appeared on TV and recommended criminal prosecutions of "Billy" Stokes' towing clients. I wrote about this public record on my website at Geocities.com, simply to preserve the public record for other victims of the crimes perpetrated by "Billy" Stokes' clients in the towing and wrecker business.

"Billy" Stokes' towing client still refuses to return my two stolen cars, which is proof of a "pattern of racketeering activity" that is an "essential element" for criminal prosecution under the RICO Act.

I am not happy with this situation, and I have expended a very large amount of time investigating my lawsuits and criminal prosecutions, and these results have been used by my own lawyers in their arguments against "Billy" Stokes. My official allegations, filed with police and courts, are that "Billy" Stokes has exceeded his ethical limitations for representing his towing clients, and is now guilty of perping felonies of aiding and abetting the crimes of his clients. This makes my sworn allegations a part of the open public record. As of today, "Billy" Stokes has NEVER responded to rebut my allegations point-by-point, as required in any court of law. He has never even denied that he is still employed by his clients in the towing business.

As a result of "Billy" Stokes' threats against me and my family of lawyers may also be proof of the felony of "witness tampering", in addition to "extortion". As a "public person" running for elected office, he is fair game for news reporters. My allegations are based on my own sworn eyewitness testimony, as recorded on video and audio tape recordings I made at the scene of the crime at "Billy" Stokes' law office, where neither he nor his employees would consent to speak with me about his client stealing my second car and attempting the defraud me of my vehicle title (the State of Tennessee Dept. of Safety agreed with me and titled my vehicle in my name).

As a result of this declaration of facts, I request the Geocities.com repost my website at GEOCITIES.COM/TOWCRIME. I understand if Geocities.com does not want to pay a lawyer to defend itself from frivolous litigation from trial lawer "Billy" Stokes, just to protect a "free" website that produces no direct revenue. But it's the principle of uncensored Free Speech, that's important.

It's bad enough that my website was punished for testifying to city council and our billionaire mayor. But the only news reports published the next day, on April 28, 2004, was that the mayor wanted an immediate property tax increase for every resident of Knoxville. Fighting city hall is cheap, but not fighting city hall is very, very expensive.

Thank you,
John Lee

Encl: Transcript City Council Meeting


KNOXVILLE CITY COUNCIL
Public Forum

TRANSCRIPT
April 27, 2004

My name is John Lee. I live at 8604 Spangler Road, Knoxville. (It is in the county and subject to predatory annexation, without representation, and doubling of property tax without any improvement in services.)

I am here regarding felony crimes perpetrated by past and present government contractors for wrecker and towing services. Two of my vehicles were stolen by your towing contractors, who you recently fired and banned from future contracts. My website on this issue is GEOCITIES.COM/TOWCRIME. I thank you for cancelling those contracts.

At the end of my five minutes, I have a request to make. If I exceed my time limit, I request an extention of time to complete my statement. This information should be useful to city council regarding the pending Wrecker Ordinance.

As this council knows, I have sued this municipal corporation regarding felony car thefts perpetrated by its towing contractors and KPD. I am glad to see that the mayor and city council now agree 100% with my federal complaint, and quoted my legal research verbatum when the city sued its own contractors for fraud. City council described these felony crimes as Racketeering and Organized Crime for antitrust price-fixing. District Attorney General Randy Nichols recommended criminal arrests and indictments. I agree.

My first car was stolen by Sutherland Avenue Wrecker Service, with the help of KPD officer Ryan Flores and Sergeant Shawna Williams. It was lawfully parked on our business and residential property downtown. No parking ticket was issued. When I called both KPD and Sutherland, both denied towing my car. So I filed a stolen vehicle report with KPD. Six weeks later, I got a tow bill for over $700. When I inspected my car, the CD player was stolen out of it. According to KPD, the CD player was stolen by Sutherland, probably at its chop shop at Moon's Used Parts on Hall Road. KPD Internal Affairs confessed this was an "IMPROPER TOW". My car's retail value was $5,500, making this a Class D Felony of Theft under TCA 39-14-103. Sending that fraudulent bill through the mail is a federal felony of mail fraud under USCA 18-63-1341. My car is still in illegal possession of Sutherland Wrecker at Moon's Used Parts, where it has been stripped of parts. I am still the lawful title holder of that vehicle. The Defendants in the City's current class action refused to settle their debt to me, under the SETTLEMENT OFFER made my Michael McGovern to this city council, as published in the Knoxville News-Sentinel in 2003.

My second car was feloniously stolen by Sutherland Wrecker in May of 2003. It had a retail value of $3,500, making it a Class D Felony. It was lawfully parked at CARMAX car dealership within the Knoxville city limits. It was noncnonsentually towed without authorization from any person. Not from me, not from any police agency, and not from CARMAX. I was never notified by Sutherland that they towed my car. CARMAX was eventually able to find the location of the car. When I went to Sutherland, I was told the towing bill was over $1,500. Yvonne Mullins refused to give me any invoice or bill for that fraudulent debt. Sutherland also attempted to steal title to that vehicle through a fruadulent lien with the State of Tennessee. After I filed an Affidavit of Probable Cause for Criminal Complaint against Sutherland, that title is now in my name. That car is still in felonious possession of Sutherland Wrecker. The Defendants in the City's current class action refused to settle their debt to me, under the SETTLEMENT OFFER made my Michael McGovern to this city council, as published in the Knoxville News Sentinel last year.

City councilor Carlene Malone was quoted in Metro Pulse as saying, "ON CITY COUNCIL WITH MAYOR ASHE, I WAS IN THE PRESENCE OF EVIL." (endquote) Hopefully, evil has now left the building.

Malone's father was a homicide detective at New York Police Department. During City Council hearings into crimes perpetrated by towing contractors, she had two cars arsoned in Knoxville, allegedly by government contractors partnered with wrecker contractors. With her degree in psychology, I suspect Malone knows EVIL when she see's it.

My family's law firm of Lee, Lee & Lee filed two class actions against two towing contractors, Sutherland Avenue Wrecker Service and Cedar Bluff 24-Hour Towing. Coincidentally, my father J.D. Lee was mugged near his home in Holston Hills by a gang of four. They put two guns to his head and said, (quote) "WE ARE GOING TO BLOW YOUR BRAINS OUT UNLESS YOU DO WHAT WE TELL YOU." Coincidentally, two months later, he voluntarily dismissed both class actions. That case is "unsolved" by KPD.

This weekend, a current towing contractor for City of Knoxville told me that Ben McGovern, one of the owners of Cedar Bluff Towing, was mugged in his gas station and left for dead, along with his wife. It was suspected by employees of Sutherland Wrecker that Moon Mullins Sr hired the "mafia" enforcers for that murder contract. This gives new meaning to what WBIR TV calls "WRECKER WARS". Before anyone feels sorry for Ben McGovern, it is alleged that he attempted to murder his girlfriend by pushing her from his moving truck, and breaking her arms and legs.

Let us not forget Roy Lee Clark, the convicted cop-killing wrecker owner who stole cars from West Town Mall, then chopped them for parts. The Knoxville News Sentinel reported on its front page, that Knox County sheriff "Teflon Tim" Hutchison worked with Clark as lookout during these car thefts, which the sheriff admits. But I don't see how he was "undercover" while wearing his uniform and driving his patrol car? Knox County deputies alleged Clark was not the real shooter of the undercover state police officer. So a police Death Squad hung the real shooter by the neck and filled him with "lead poisoning". The coroner alleged this summary execution was a "suicide". It is alleged by police that Dr. Pedigo, the coroner, was shot by TBI for his link to this cop-killing.

This quote is currently broadcast on TV...

[END OF FIVE MINUTE TIME LIMIT - EXTENSION OF TIME GRANTED]

[WRITTEN REPORT ON THE RECORD -- "Hangin' Judge" Roy Bean of Texas made the folowing court order for a cattle russler and horse thief, that is the modern day version of car theft: (quote) "You have been tried by twelve good men and true, not of your peers but as high aboveyou as heaven is of hell, and they have said you are guilty. Time will pass and seasons will come and go. Spring with its wavin' green grass and heaps of sweet-smellin' flowers on every hill and in every dale. Then sultry Summer, with her shimmerin' heat-waves on the baked horizon. And Fall, with her yeller harvest moon and the hills growin' brown and golden under a sinkin' sun. And finally Winter, with its bitin', whinin' wind, and all the land will be mantled with snow. But you won't be here to see any of 'em; not by a damn sight, because it's the order of this court that you be took to the nearest tree and hanged by the neck til you're dead, dead, dead, you olive-colored son of a billy goat."]

[The U.S.A.P.A.T.R.I.O.T. Acts defined all felonies and misdemeanors as "Domestic Terrorism". 72nd OREGON LEGISLATIVE ASSEMBLY--2003 Regular Session, Senate Bill 742, amendment to Chapter 666, Oregon Laws 2001, Rense.com, "Oregon Bill Gives Protestors LIFE In Prison In Forest Work Camp - Reclassifies ALL Crimes as 'Terrorism'", including unauthorized use of a vehicle, unlawful entry into a motor vehicle, burglary, theft, robbery, forgery, bribery, and official misconduct. Under the pending "Homeland Security" 'Terrorist Penalties Enhancement Act' (HR 2934), the government will kill you by Death Penalty for the crime of "terrorism", including car theft.]

During our investigation into our towing class actions, we got statements from dozens of crime victims. One person found his car hijacked with 15 minutes left on the parking meter. The driver for Sutherland Wrecker falsely alleged there was a law requiring payment of a "SET DOWN FEE" before he could release the car. The owner of the car displayed a lawfully registered handgun to the tow trucker. The stolen car was then released without payment of any fee. The owner did not choose to make a CITIZEN'S ARREST under TCA 40-7-101. But he could have. That was on Main Street.

KPD alleges it is too busy writing 125,000 annual parking and traffic citations to make arrests of car thieves driving tow trucks. Knoxville City Court keeps a TOP SECRET docket of 75,000 annual parking citations and vehicle forfeitures for alleged parking tickets, as Court Clerk Michael Martin confessed when I subpoenaed him to testify in court. This is a criminal violation of the Tennessee Open Records Act and other statutes. This secrecy makes these towing crimes possible when it comes to stealing and laundering titles for stolen vehicles. Martin was fired one month later, for theft and extortion.

Entire neighborhoods in Knoxville are looted by fleets of tow trucks, who steal lawfully parked vehicles on the residents' own property. The vehicle owners are never given a court hearing, and never get their cars back.

Towing lawyer Michael McGovern admitted to city council last year that 40% of all vehicles towed are NEVER returned to the vehicle owners. Michael McGovern is son of Ben McGovern, one of the owners of Cedar Bluff Towing. Another partner of Cedar Bluff is Miller Industries and RoadOne, the $40-Billion cartel that includes BFI and Waste Management. They own 20,000 tow trucks and garbage trucks. They have a history of prosecution by the US Justice Department for billion-dollar antitrust violations for conspiring to fix prices on government garbage contracts. The chairman of those companies is William Miller, who lives just outside of Knoxville on Highway 11 in Loudon County. A&E TV Investigative Reports, titled "MODERN MOBS", reported that 25 of BFI's employees were convicted under the RICO Act for membership in the Gambino and Genovese Mafia families. This resulted in "the largest tax cut in New York City history" of $600-Million, to end the Mafia Tax on garbage collection.

[CUT FOR TIME LIMIT, INCLUDED IN WRITTEN REPORT -- Today, Knoxville taxpayers were billed for a $200,000 Egyptian memorial to the 3,000 people murdered on September 11, 2001, thanks to our former Skull & Bones mayor. BFI and Controlled Demolitions Incorporated were paid $7-Billion government contract to demolish and cart away the evidence at the World Trade Center. The owners of CDI are graduates of University of Tennessee in Knoxville, according to the UT website. The government owners and renters of the World Trade Center admitted on PBS TV, "America Rebuilds", that they bombed the 50-story-tall World Trade Center Building 7 with explosives and controlled demolitions on 9-11-2001, even though it was undamaged by any crash from an airliner nor by any falling debris. The president of the United States and his White House staff have been sued under the RICO Act for perpetrating the terrorist massacres on September 11, 2001, in the federal lawsuit MARIANI V. BUSH. Mrs. Mariani's husband's name is on the tombstone on Main Street in Knoxville. You can read about that civil prosecution at 911FORTHETRUTH.COM]

[This is where we are at with the felony towing crimes perpetrated in Knoxville today, which are literally tied to DOMESTIC TERRORISM in America. If government can't control your own gangsters, we citizens will be forced to do your job for you, as allowed under Tennessee and federal law.]

[I request that city council remove that $200,000 memorial to the terrorism and treason perpetrated by our government on 9-11, and their Mafia-owned garbage and towing contractors who profited from it.]

[I request that ungodly perverted idol be sold to pay for the cars stolen by Knoxville towing contractors.]

I request that City of Knoxville Corporation immediately pay me for my stolen car at retail value plus interest. In the alternative, I request to join your class action lawsuit against Sutherland Wrecker to seek payment for my stolen car.

[I request that KPD begin arresting employees of towing companies for car theft and fraud, and seizing their assets.]

I request that City Court produce an Open Public Record of its Top Secret court docket, as required by law, so that victims of towing crimes can find out who stole their vehicles.

(End of second time extension)

John Lee: "May I have another two minutes extension of time?"
Mayor Bill Haslam: "No."
John Lee: "So no one wants to hear what I have to say?"
Mayor Bill Haslam: "No."
John Lee: "Thank you for your time. Here is a copy of my report for each member of city council."

[A COPY OF THIS WRITTEN REPORT WAS PROVIDED TO EACH MEMBER OF CITY COUNCIL. TEXT INSIDE BRACKETS WAS INCLUDED IN THE WRITTEN REPORT.]

Coincidence?

"Flanked by his family and a phalanx of police officers, longtime Knoxville Police Chief Phil Keith said Monday he will retire, effective Aug. 31, ending his 16-year tenure as the city's top law enforcement officer. Keith, 54, has steered KPD since 1988, when former Mayor Victor Ashe picked him to leapfrog over Chief Robert Marshall to become police commissioner. Ashe named him chief after Marshall retired later that year. 'The thing I'm most proud of is I haven't lost a police officer on my watch,' [other than the police-approved cop-killing of KPD Officer Tony Williams] he told a crowd of city officials, police and other well-wishers at Safety City. Ashe, who has been confirmed as the next U.S. ambassador to Poland, credits Keith with modernizing the police department and cutting the crime rate in the city."
—Scott Barker, Knoxville News-Sentinel, "Top cop ready for change - Keith to retire from police department he transformed into modern operation," May 25, 2004

"Knoxville is looking for a new police chief for the first time in almost two decades after Phil Keith announced his retirement at a press conference on Monday. Two years ago, President Bush appointed him to the Senior Advisory Committee to the Department of Homeland Security. But he says his most proud accomplishment at chief is that no officer died in the line of duty on his watch [other than the police-approved cop-killing of KPD Officer Tony Williams]."
—Teresa Woodard, WBIR TV, "KNOXVILLE POLICE CHIEF TO RETIRE AT END OF SUMMER," 5/24/2004

See Also: Criminal conspiracy, fraud and racketeering in arrest and ticket quotas perped and confessed by KPD chief Phil Keith versus Fraternal Order of Police


Towtown Times

"The Knoxville City Council weighed in on the wrecker controversy Tuesday, voting to ask four tow truck operators to reimburse customers for any overcharges. The panel voted 7-0, with two abstentions, in a resolution demanding that Cedar Bluff 24-Hour Towing, Sutherland Avenue Wrecker Service, Fountain City Wrecker Service and Chestnut Street Garage pay back money, with interest, to people and insurance companies allegedly overcharged under terms of municipal contracts. 'They've made excuses for it, but the fact is, a contract is a contract,' Mayor Victor Ashe said. The resolution does not compel the companies to comply. 'They knew the rules, and I think they willingly overcharged citizens in this community,' Wrecker Commission Chairman Mark Williamson told council members. Williamson said two companies submitted altered invoices, while another apparently maintains two sets of books. 'Use any term you want,' Williamson said, 'but fraud is fraud.' Noting that records showed the four companies overcharged in every incident reviewed, Williamson said the firms 'engaged in collusion to set prices and overcharge citizens.' The companies plan to place an advertisement soon in the News Sentinel inviting people who think they've been overcharged to contact them for possible refunds. The towing companies have no objections to providing refunds in cases where it might be appropriate,' McGovern said. Ashe has ordered the Law Department to explore ways to file a class-action lawsuit to recover any overcharges and to compile evidence to turn over to prosecutors for a possible criminal investigation."
Knoxnews.com, Nov 26, 2003

"According to records released by the city, the wrecker services overcharged insurance companies on calls requested by police. City contracts give the companies monopolies on police-generated calls in various sectors of the city. In exchange for the monopolies, the companies signed contracts agreeing to charge lower rates. The regulated prices don't apply to privately arranged towing jobs [which are also fraud if a NONCON private tow is alleged to be a consentual contract with a vehicle owner, since the contract is ONLY owed by the person ordering the tow, and the tow company has committed felony car theft]. 'These overcharges hit innocent citizens, and to the degree that these charges are paid for by insurance companies, it may cause an increase in insurance premiums,' Ashe said. 'This documented overcharging is reprehensible and 'predatory' [as the Annexator calls the kettle black], so I am asking City Council to adopt this resolution that calls for immediate restitution of the charges.'"
Knoxnews.com, Nov 25, 2003

"The amounts some Knoxville towing companies charge could be criminal. The city's law department is now looking through towing records after the wrecker service commission says it found massive over billings by towing companies with city contracts. The Wrecker Service Commission says with four of five companies under city contract every single invoice audited had problems. The Wrecker Service Commission says Sutherland Avenue Wrecker service, Cedar Bluff towing, Chestnut Street garage, and Fountain City Wrecker service all overcharged people, and their insurance companies for towing. The commission believes that shows a pattern of intentional overcharging. Wrecker Service Commission's Mark Williamson said, 'They have turned in to the city documentation that was just simply false.'"
WBIR TV, 21 Nov 2003

"The Wrecker Commission leveled its charges after a spot check found the four companies supplied incorrect or incomplete billing information in 18 of 18 randomly selected incidents. Records show the companies submitted manifests to the city claiming to have charged the lower rates mandated by the contracts. But they submitted invoices to insurance companies for up to 16 times the amounts reported to the city. Records show Cedar Bluff 24-Hour Towing charged Progressive $95 for towing a 1991 Honda Accord on June 6 but submitted documents to the city indicating the charge was $39, the amount stipulated by the contract. Cedar Bluff also failed to report other charges that boosted the total bill sent to Progressive to $578.85. In another instance, records released by the city show Chestnut Street Garage charged State Farm Insurance Companies the proper amount - $75 - for towing a 1990 Ford Aerostar van on June 7. However, the bill sent to State Farm totaled $380.90, including costs not disclosed to city officials."
Knoxville News-Sentinel, 21 Nov 2003

"The records - including crash reports, invoices and manifests - outline a pattern of overcharging that city officials estimate has cost insurance companies thousands of dollars over the past year. 'There was a deliberate effort to deceive the city and the wrecker commission,' Chairman Mark Williamson said. Knoxville Law Director Michael Kelley said the report could become a basis for criminal charges. 'In three of the four cases, there is evidence of fraudulent billing,' Kelley said. 'We'll be looking at it to see if there's evidence sufficient to turn over to the attorney general for investigation.' Knox County District Attorney General Randy Nichols said he would launch a criminal probe if presented with evidence of a violation of state law. Melissa Peters, internal auditor to Knoxville City Council, conducted the review for the wrecker commission. She said the invoices indicate that Sutherland Avenue Wrecker Service keeps two sets of books and that Chestnut Street Garage and Cedar Bluff Wrecker Service altered their bills."
Knoxville News-Sentinel, 21 Nov 2003

"Additionally, the commission found inconsistent tax charges on impoundments, other charges added to the initial tows and, in the case of Sutherland Avenue Wrecker, separate manifests that indicated two sets of books."
Knoxville News-Sentinel, 20 Nov 2003

"Towing companies keep 40% of all cars towed in Knoxville and never return them to their owners."
—Michael McGovern, attorney-at-law and tow truck driver, editor of LegalEze at Tow Times magazine and "the world's best towing lawyer" who wrote the towing section of the FAAA Act for US Congress, son of Ben McGovern, co-owner of Cedar Bluff Towing with $40-Billion Mafia-convicted cartel Miller Industries and BFI, Knoxville City Council special session, 25 Nov 2003

"Yesterday I speculated about the timing of the City of Knoxville's investigation into its wrecker towing contracts. I wondered if outgoing term-limited Mayor Victor Ashe was tying up loose ends to polish his legacy. Today's headline story by ace reporter Scott Barker may answer the question: 'Wrecker fees rile mayor.' I think that's a great idea, "taking an active role to protect citizens against predatory practices". And nobody should complain that he's been at the helm for sixteen years, because better late than never and all that. I wonder if there will be a similar investigation into the downtown parking contracts which I hear so much griping about? All you folks in the know... dish! P.S. The News Sentinel also invites anyone who believes he or she has been overbilled in these instances to e-mail them at news@knews.com. Do you think they will hear from this guy?"
South Knox Bubba, 22 Nov 2003

"This is a message for Scott Barker (865-342-6309). Sutherland Avenue Wrecker committed felony car theft by stealing two cars from me. Sutherland's lawyer Billy Stokes at Stokes and Rutherford illegally and fraudulently tried to steal title to one of my vehicles and chopped the other vehicle at its chop shop at Moon's Used Parts at the home of Moon Mullins Sr on Hall Road. Billy Stokes heads Knox County Republican Party and is campaigning for state senate." Scott Barker and KnoxNews.com did not return the call. Knoxville News Sentinel was given $20-Million corporate welfare by Republican mayor Victor Ashe to abandon its toxic waste dump downtown and move into its free new HQ.
—Webmaster John Lee, 24 Nov 2003

KNOXVILLE NEWS-SENTINEL SURVEY RESULTS: Have you had your car towed and felt you were being overcharged by the wrecker service?
READER COMMENTS: "sutherland ave wrecker sux balls!" November 21, 2003, 4:17 AM


TOWTOWN WRECKER SERVICE - KNS 11/25/2003


Teflon Tim's Towcrimes

by John Lee

Knox County sheriff Tim Hutchison (a/k/a "Hutchinson") assisted in the Task Force raiding the house of the Loudon County prosecutor and his alleged cop-killing son, during the murder of a Loudon County sheriff's deputy at the prosecutor's house. Who is this unmasked man?

In March 2004, Knox County sheriff Tim Hutchison was named in banner headlines at Knoxville News-Sentinel as a business partner with tow-trucker Randy Hinton (paid $50,000/year with an invisible no-bid contract), owner of Chestnut Street Garage, Cedar Bluff 24-Hour Towing (CBT) and "Moneymakers" Towing in Loudon County ("Hutchison land deals raise conflict questions", March 7, 2004).

William Miller lives in Loudon County in "The House That Garbage Built", as local residents call it. Miller is chairman of Browning-Ferris Industries (BFI) and Miller Industries, among many others all over the world, with $40-Billion annual revenues. BFI was named by A&E TV's Investigative Reports - "Modern Mobs", as having 25 subcontractors convicted under RICO Act for membership in Gambino and Genovese Mafia families. BFI owns 10,000 garbage trucks. Miller Industries owns 10,000 tow trucks (possibly the owner of the company that towed the wing commander's car).

CBT was owned by Miller Industries in partnership with Ben McGovern (who allegedly tried to murder a girlfriend by pushing her out of his moving truck and breaking her limbs). McGovern's son Michael is the attorney representing all the government-employed tow-truckers in Knoxville sued in class action by Skull & Bones mayor Victor Ashe for fraud, extortion, theft and racketeering, including Chestnutt Street Garage and CBT (using a verbatum legal brief as writing by this webmaster when sueing the mayor, his police and his towing contractors).

Sheriff Hutchison was previously named on the front page of the Sentinel as confessing to stealing cars with a convicted cop-killing tow-trucker, Roy Lee Clark (according to his own chief of detectives, J.J. Jones), at West Town Mall (Mafia owned and operated as reported in cover story by Metro Pulse, who one week later coincidentally found one of its journalists floating face-down in the lake in dead of winter). According to a Knox County sheriff's deputy, Clark was not the "trigger man", so a state-police Death Squad held a necktie party for the real cop-killer, then filled him with "lead poisoning". This officially sanctioned assassination was declared a "suicide" by the convicted homosexual-rapist county coroner/police officer, Dr. Randall Pedigo, who was himself gunned down by TBI while resisting arrest. Pedigo was allegedly raided for adding the cop-killing gun to his personal collection of weapons seized from the disarmed public.

"In March 1990, the Knoxville Field Office began an undercover operation, utilizing an undercover police officer (MICHAEL LLOYD RECTOR), in the investigation of ROY LEE CLARK. CLARK was suspected of operating a major commercial auto theft business throughout the southeastern part of the United States. In April, 1990, Special Agents executed a search warrant on the business premises of ROY LEE CLARK. Special Agents assigned to the Knoxville Field Office were assisted by the TENNESSEE HIGHWAY PATROL, the KNOX COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE, the KNOXVILLE POLICE DEPARTMENT, and the NATIONAL AUTO THEFT BUREAU. The search resulted in the removal of stolen goods valued in excess of $700,000.00. On May 31, 1990, MICHAEL LLOYD RECTOR, the undercover police officer was murdered in the front yard of his residence by an assailant firing numerous rounds at close range with a .9 mm semi-automatic pistol. ROY LEE CLARK was indicted on October 23, 1991, for the murder of RECTOR and was later convicted of that crime."
—Federal Bureau of Investigation, Knoxville, Tennessee, "History of Knoxville Field Office"

Is sheriff Tim Hutchison, the confessed car-thief ("working 'undercover'" with a convicted cop-killer while wearing his police uniform and driving his patrol car), related to this convicted-killer car-thief named "Hutchison" living in Knoxville, Tennssee?

"Mr. Leonard Hutchison spent 14 years in prison for a crime he did not commit! Why? Because the police and District Attorney's used false evidence and perjured testimony, yes perjured testimony, to convict Mr. Hutchison. The first trial ended in a hung jury. But the second did not. He was convicted of second-degree attempted murder and spent every day after that trying to prove his innocence. The shooting occurred during an attempted auto theft. The investigators and police collected large amounts of physical evidence from the scene including, burglary tools, bloody clothing, and pictures of the parking lot. Mr. Hutchison, when arrested, also had tools collected from his home as 'evidence'. The tools were then sent to the FBI crime lab for analysis to see if they could have been used to inflict the damage that had been done to the vehicle, ie. the ignition removed and so on. The results of the lab reports clearly indicated that his tools COULD NOT have been used to do this damage. No question about it. At trial, the jury heard a different story. First, the prosecutor in question did not give the reports to the defense because he said they were inconclusive. Then, at trial the prosecutor, with the aide of the investigating officers, showed the jury how Mr. Hutchisons tools were used on the car, clearly putting him at the scene of the crime. As earlier established by the FBI, his tools could not have been the tools used. Finally, a detective in the case testified that the tools matched according to the lab report! Interestingly enough, this was the very detective that initiated and requested the tests to be done on Mr. Hutchison's tools. Next, the FBI had been involved in an independent investigation of auto theft rings in Knoxville, Tennessee at this time. During this investigation, they uncovered evidence that strongly suggested that another individual committed this crime. They reported this to the District Attorney's office after conclusion of the undercover investigation and the District Attorney's office initiated a TBI investigation regarding these discoveries. The TBI came up with the same conclusions. However, none of this information was given to the defense, nor Mr. Hutchison until he had spent several years in prison, although the TBI investigation was over well before the decision was rendered on his direct appeal. Finally, if this were not enough, the District Attorney's office had physical evidence in it's possession from the beginning that indicated that another individual had committed this crime. There was a blood soaked shirt that was collected from an individual that had threatened the victim just prior to the shooting. This shirt, as well as the one worn by the victim were sent to the lab to see if the blood matched. This was prior to the availability of DNA testing. Unknown to the defense, 2 blood group factors did match. When the technology of DNA testing became available years later,( and used in many states to free wrongly convicted individuals and make the truly guilty stand trial ) the shirts DISAPPEARED! This is not the first time that Tennessee Courts have allowed crucial evidence to disappear from records. Interestingly enough, it is the very evidence that would clear the accused as to guilt. Finally, if perjury, deliberate tampering with evidence, and nondisclosure of clearly exculpatory evidence is not enough, a juror has now stepped forward and said that he could not live with the idea of sending an innocent man to prison without saying something. He was speaking directly about the tools and how they were presented to the jury. It was all lies! Deliberate! One has to ask if they even cared that the real perpetrator has never paid for this crime. Mr. Hutchison won his case at the trial court level on the FBI findings in their separate investigation alone. BUT, the Tennessee Criminal Court of Appeals has overturned that decision and now, he could face more time in prison. Mr. Hutchison is well over 50 now and his wife, since his release has battled breast cancer, and thankfully, has appeared to have won that battle. But the system here in Tennessee does not seem to have relief for a man that no one really doubts is innocent of this crime. The Tennessee Criminal Court of Appeals notes that while this evidence is clearly exculpatory, the District Attorney's office cannot be expected to turn over evidence collected by a federal agency! The duty of the State in criminal cases is to seek justice. They are different that defense attorney's in that they represent the people and until the accused is convicted, must uphold certain constitutional rights of the accused. It is more than unethical to use perjured testimony and false evidence to convict an innocent man. Keep in mind that while deciding to prosecute this man using evidence that was clearly flawed, the investigation led the State down different paths which they intentionally ignored simply because it would hurt their case against Mr. Hutchison. This is not seeking justice. So now Mr. Hutchison must again attempt to seek justice in a system that clearly does not value actual innocence! If you would like confirmation of these events and details, simply contact the Knoxville News Sentinel in Knoxville, Tennessee. There are fairly current articles about Mr. Hutchison covered in this paper as well as the Knoxville Journal. Now, as you watch your evening news and they describe the evidence being presented against the accused, just remember, Mr. Hutchison's case was covered also. I sometimes wonder just how investigative, investigative journalists are. Do they really have scientific evidence that links the accused to this crime? Make no mistake, it's not a question of whether someone should pay for these crimes, let's just try to make it the right someone's! An innovative idea? Or is it that as long as someone pays who cares? I suppose the only way to see how much the public cares is to see how many voices respond. Mr. Hutchison and his family need your support, voice, and prayers. Without enough attention, the public will not hear his cries from the depths of the Tennessee Judicial system and he will again be lost! If you are interested in assisting Mr. Hutchison, contact Phil Hanby of the Knoxville Journal. Thank you for visiting and taking the time to read and respond."
—MediaFilter.org, "THE FBI SAY HE IS INNOCENT," February 10, 1998

Hutchison also confessed to renting an airport from a convicted-felon drug kingpin.

Hutchison also confessed to building hundreds of houses with his convicted-felon business partner (who lacked a license). The sheriff is currently named as building a house for his favorite towing contractor, Randy Hinton, owner of Chestnut Street Garage, Cedar Bluff 24-Hour Towing (CBT) and Moneymakers Towing.

Hutchison was also convicted of six counts of criminal contempt of court for perjury, but did not serve jail time in his own jail, since he was too "busy" running it.

Hutchison also led a police-military Martial Law Task Force to forcibly evacuate 30,000 residents after a US Army train "derailed" and "spilled sulfuric acid" (that appeared to be a Media-Military Mind-Kontrol wargame exercise using smoke-fire bombs, sold to the sheeple by giggling disnfo babes on TeeVee).

Tennessee leads the nation in number of sheriffs convicted of drug dealing. In fact, the previous sheriff of Knox County, Joe Jenkins, was convicted and sent to prison for million-dollar car theft to feed his cocaine hobby.

The Sheriff is reportdly the "most-powerful" employee of government in every county in the United States, due to "selective enforcement" of the power to arrest. The exception to this rule of law are counties that waiver their Constitutional rights, and vote to end all voting, by voting for a Communist "Metropolitan" form of appointed - rather than elected - government law enforcers.

sheriff. A county's chief peace officer, usu. elected, who in most jurisdictions acts as custodian of the county jail, executes civil and criminal process, and carries out judicial mandates in the county.

"Davidson County Sheriffs Department is NOT a law enforcement agency."
Davidson County Sheriff's Department, Nashville, Tennessee, Nashville-Sheriff.net - FAQ

Just like City of Knoxville Municipal Corporation's mayor appointed its own city court judge, that serves at the whim of the mayor and city council, in violation of the Tennessee Constitution and Code, due to violation of the Separation of Powers Doctrine between the executive and judicial branches, as required in all criminal prosecutions. This act forced the city court to forever waiver its power to prosecute criminal matters of any kind, and forced the closing of the KPD jail. But, of course, the gangster government of City of Knoxville Municipal Corporation fraudulently lies to all defendants in its city court, alleging it is prosecuting criminal matters, and illegally demanding defendants "plead guilty" or "innocent", using Criminal Rules of Procedure, when it knows that only CIVIL Rules of Procedure are allowed in its city court.

These are the same gangsters who love to condemnation land grabs (and steal motor vehicles) without payment, and tax-and-spend corporate welfare via unelected "predatory annexation" and doubled (voluntary) property taxes (i.e., "rent"), and raise rents in Knox County, who seek to overthrow the gangsters in Knox County government, to replace KC with "Metro" corporate "government".

feud. An inheritable estate in land conveyed from a feudal superior to a grantee or tenant, held on the condition of rendering service to a superior.
—Black's Law Dictionary, 7th Edition

rent. 1. Consideration paid, usu. periodically for the use and occupancy of property (esp. real property). 3. Civil law. A contract by which one party conveys to another party a tract of land or other immovable property, to be held by the other party as owner and in perpetuity, in exchange for payment of an annual sum of money.
—Black's Law Dictionary, 7th Edition

property tax. A tax levied on the owner of property (esp. real property), usu. based on the property's value.
—Black's Law Dictionary, 7th Edition

tax sale. A sale of property because of nonpayment of taxes.
—Black's Law Dictionary, 7th Edition

execution sale. A forced sale by a government official carrying out a writ of execution. Also termed forced sale, judgment sale, sheriff's sale. See EXECUTION.
—Black's Law Dictionary, 7th Edition

execution. 1. The act of carrying out or putting into effect (as a court order). 3. Judicial enforcement of a money judgment, usu. by seizing and selling the the judgment debtor's property. 4. A court order directing a sheriff or other officer to nforce a judgment, usu. by seizing and selling the judgment debtor's property (the court issued the execution authorizing seizure of the car).
—Black's Law Dictionary, 7th Edition

improper feud. A nonmilitary feud; a feud that is base or servile in nature. Feuds came to be bought and sold, and deviations were made from the old fundamental rules of tenure and succession, which were held no longer sacred., when the feuds themselves no longer continued to be military.
—Black's Law Dictionary, 7th Edition

proper feud. A feud based on military service.
—Black's Law Dictionary, 7th Edition

draft. 1. An unconditional written order signed by one person (the drawer) directing another person (the drawee or payer) to pay a certain sum of money on demand or at a definite time to a third person (the payee) or to bearer. 2. The compulsory enlistment of persons into military service.
—Black's Law Dictionary, 7th Edition

deserter. A soldier who unilaterally leaves national military service with the intention of reneging on military obligations either permanently or for the duration of a military operation.
—Black's Law Dictionary, 7th Edition

Desertion. (c) Any person found guilty of desertion or attempt to desert shall be punished, if the offense is committed in time of war, by death or such other punishment as a court-martial may direct, but if the desertion or attempt to desert occurs at any other time, by such punishment, other than death, as a court-martial may direct.
Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ), §885.85

servitude. The three types of servitude are easements, licenses, and profits. See EASEMENT; LICENSE; PROFIT.
—Black's Law Dictionary, 7th Edition

license. 1. A revokable permission to commit some act that would otherwise be unlawful.
—Black's Law Dictionary, 7th Edition

involuntary servitude. The condition of one forced to labor -- for pay or not -- for another by coercion or imprisonment.
—Black's Law Dictionary, 7th Edition

slavery. 1. A situation in which one person has absolute power over the life, fortune, and liberty of another. 2. The practice of keeping individuals in sucha state of bondage or servitude. Slavery was outlawed by the 13th Amendment to the US Consitution.
—Black's Law Dictionary, 7th Edition

"No amendment shall be made to the Constitution which will authorize or give to Congress the power to abolish or interfere, within any State, with the domestic institutions thereof, including that of persons held to labor or service by the laws of said State."
CONSTITUTION OF THE UNITED STATES, Article Thirteen. [Proposed 1861; Endorsed by Lincoln while president-elect; Unratified]

"Neither slavery nor involuntary servitude, except as a punishment for crime whereof the party shall have been duly convicted, shall exist within the United States, or any place subject to their jurisdiction."
CONSTITUTION OF THE UNITED STATES, Article. XIII., Section. 1. [Proposed 1865; Ratified 1865]

Contract Clause. No State shall enter into any Treaty, Alliance, or Confederation; grant Letters of Marque and Reprisal; coin Money; emit Bills of Credit; make any Thing but gold and silver Coin a Tender in Payment of Debts; pass any Bill of Attainder, ex post facto Law, or Law impairing the Obligation of Contracts, or grant any Title of Nobility.
CONSTITUTION OF THE UNITED STATES, Section. 10.

feudalism. A landholding system, particularly applying to medievil Europe, in which all are bound by their status in the heirarchy of reciprocal obligations and defense. The lord was obligated to give the vassel some land, protection nd justice. The lord guaranteed the quiet occupation of the land by the vassel and guaranteed to do right if the vassel becaome involved in a dispute. In return, the vassel owed the lord some kind of service, called "tenure". Also term feudal system.
—Black's Law Dictionary, 7th Edition

Is that why KC is allowed to employ crooked sheriffs, to make a joke out of county government, so the apathetic voters will lay down and waiver their elected form of government? Do KC deputies care about losing their jobs? Do they care that they currently have to pay their paychecks to their superiors to get promoted, just like city court clerks did in Knoxville city court, until this webmaster subpoenaed the court clerk and forced him to testify against himself and the court?

"Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives in General Assembly convened: This act shall take effect from its passage, except that (1) sections 1 to 7, inclusive, 10 to 123, inclusive, 125 to 138, inclusive, 147, 148 and 150 to 153, inclusive, shall take effect December 1, 2000, (2) if the Secretary of the State certifies that the constitutional amendment eliminating county sheriffs was not approved by the voters, sections 8, 9, 139 to 146, inclusive, and 149 shall cease to be effective on the date of said certification, and sections 1 to 7, inclusive, 10 to 123, inclusive, 125 to 138, inclusive, 147, 148 and 150 to 153, inclusive, shall not take effect on December 1, 2000, and (3) section 124 shall take effect on the date when both of the following events have occurred: (A) The Secretary of the State has certified the vote approving the constitutional amendment eliminating county sheriffs, and (B) the Commissioner of Children and Families has filed with the Governor and General Assembly written certification that the new Connecticut Juvenile Training Center is operational. Approved April 27, 2000."
—Connecticut Public Act No. 00-99 Sec. 154., "An Act Reforming The Sheriff System" (Georges' Bush home state)

A county sheriff is the highest-ranking cop in that county, who trumps both state "corporately chartered" police and all federal police, including FBI, "Homeland Security", DEA/CIA, IRS, BATF, Pentagon, US Congress, US president, etc. The power of the elected sheriff is all that blocks the path of organized crime from a tyrannical police state. Or, a crooked sheriff can facilitate the destruction of America for his masters in the New World Order.

"Bighorn County Sheriff Dave Mattis spoke at a press conference following the recent U.S. District Court decision (Case No. 2:96-cv-099-J) and announced that all federal officials are forbidden to enter his county without his prior approval. 'If a sheriff doesn't want the Feds in his county he has the constitutional power and right to keep them out or ask them to leave or retain them in custody.' The court decision was the result of a suit against both the BATF and the IRS by Mattis and other members of the Wyoming Sheriffs' Association. Since the judge states the sheriff 'has law enforcement powers EXCEEDING that of any other state OR federal official,' the Wyoming sheriffs are flexing their muscles. They are demanding access to all BATF files. Why? So as to verify the agency is not violating provisions of Wyoming law that prohibits the registration of firearms or the keeping of a registry of firearm owners. The sheriffs are also demanding that federal agencies immediately cease the seizure of private property and the impoundment of private bank accounts without regard to due process in state courts."
—Geoff Metcalf, RestoringAmerica.org, "Wyoming Sheriff Analysis"

Maybe city and county government employees are tired of their pension funds getting looted every year as confessed offically in city, county and state Consolidated Annual Financial Reports (CAFR)? It's not like we can count of Social Security "Trust Fund Insurance", which is officially $71-Trillion overdrawn, which is $250,000 debt to repay by every man, woman and baby in Amerika today. Governments that withdrew from Social Security withholding contracts now have $50,000 per retiree to show for it, rather than negative dollars for governments withholding for SS, according to US Congress. Perhaps it's time for Knox County to salvage itself by electing a REAL honest-to-God sheriff. Perhaps it's time to elect John D. Lee II for Top Cop in Knox County, Tennessee, USA.... Heck, I'm already doing most of the sheriff's work, anyway. And maybe then arrest warrants will finally burn Teflon Tim.

"The people never give up their liberties but under some delusion. The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing."
—Edmund Burke


Legislative Update for Sheriffs

County Technical Advisory Service

Public Chapter 868 (Senate Bill 1683 House Bill 1876) Expands definition of unclaimed or abandoned vehicles to include immobile and unattended motor vehicles. Provides that an immobile or unattended vehicle may not be towed until 12 hours have elapsed from the time it was first observed, unless it creates a hazard, blocks access to public or private property, or is parked illegally. Expands the garagekeeper's lien to include towing firms as well. Provides that there is no right to a lien on a vehicle that has been towed illegally or without authorization. Requires the authorization from a law enforcement agency to be written and to include the officer's name, the year, make, model, and color of the vehicle, the license plate number, and the vehicle ID number. A copy of this authorization must remain with the vehicle. Effective July 1, 1996.

Copyright © 2003 The University of Tennessee, CTAS * Nashville, Tennessee 37219 - 1804 * Telephone 615-532-3555


Prosecuting Towcrimes

KNOX COUNTY LOCAL RULES OF COURT - RULE 20 - JUDICIAL COMMISSIONERS
     Judicial Commissioners may sign warrants for prosecutions initiated by private citizens, but only if a police report has been filed. A copy of the police report must be presented to the Judicial Commissioner on duty by the complaining individual before the warrant is signed. Bad check prosecutions may be initiated through the District Attorney General's Office. Judicial Commissioners will not sign search warrants until the warrants have been reviewed and approved by the District Attorney General's Office. Judicial Commissioners will conduct prisoner initial appearances, Monday through Friday, using the interactive close-circuit television link to the jail and the detention facility. [Amended 1998.]

Tennessee Code 40-6-205. Issuance of warrant
     [Amendment effective January 1, 2004. See the Compiler's Notes].
     If the magistrate is satisfied from the written examination that there is probable cause to believe the offense complained of has been committed and that there is probable cause to believe the defendant has committed it, then the magistrate shall issue a warrant of arrest. The finding of probable cause shall be based on evidence, which may be hearsay in whole or in part; provided, that there is a substantial basis for believing the source of the hearsay to be credible and for believing that there is a factual basis for the information furnished. If the affiant is not a law enforcement officer, as defined by § 39-11-106(21), or if none of the affiants in the case of multiple-affiants is a law enforcement officer, as defined by § 39-11-106(21), then a criminal summons as provided in § 40-6-215 shall issue instead of a warrant of arrest; provided, however, that in the case of multiple-affiants, if one or more of the affiants is a law enforcement officer as defined by § 39-11-106(21), then the magistrate may issue a warrant of arrest; provided, further, that if, after examination of the affiant and the affidavit of complaint, the magistrate has probable cause to believe that the issuance of a warrant of arrest rather than a criminal summons is necessary to prevent an immediate threat of imminent harm to a victim as defined in § 36-3-601(8), and makes a written finding of fact that an arrest warrant rather than a criminal summons is necessary, the magistrate may issue a warrant of arrest notwithstanding the fact that the affiant is not a law enforcement officer, or, in the case of multiple-affiants, that none of the affiants is a law enforcement officer.
     [Code 1858, § 5022; Shan., § 6981; Code 1932, § 11520; T.C.A. (orig. ed.), § 40-704; Acts 2003, ch. 366, § 3.]

"Knox County General Sessions Court judges are up in arms over a new law that requires some alleged criminals to be summoned to court in lieu of an arrest. The law in question makes it mandatory for judicial commissioners to issue summonses, instead of arrest warrants in cases in which a citizen is seeking to have someone charged with a crime. Although the law change was intended to stop so-called retaliation warrants - in which two people in a dispute seek to have the other arrested - the judges contend it is endangering the public. 'We have cases in Knox County involving pistol whipping, stabbing and kidnapping in which victims have been unable to get arrest warrants because they are not police officers in spite of the fact that the defendants have extensive criminal records,' the judges wrote. Under the old law, any citizen in Tennessee was allowed to obtain an arrest warrant if a judicial commissioner was convinced there was enough probable cause to believe a crime had been committed and the person being accused had committed it. But a law passed last year only allowed the issuance of arrest warrants when the complaining person was a law enforcement officer. Shoplifters not caught in the act by police cannot, under the new law, be arrested. A man who threatens his neighbor with a gun or attacks another person cannot be arrested unless an officer either witnessed the incident or was willing to choose sides in the case. Instead, a summons would be issued, informing the accused criminal to show up at a local jail within 10 days to be fingerprinted, booked and given a court date. State Sen. Jim Bryson, R-Franklin, and State Rep. Glen Casada, R-Franklin, are sponsoring two bills to change the law. One bill would allow warrants to be issued against shoplifters and bad check writers, a move that would satisfy complaining merchants. The second bill would essentially scrap the law change, allowing judicial commissioners to decide whether to issue a warrant or summons. 'We've got to readdress it,' Casada said. 'Criminals are smart. They know the law. If they see they aren't going to be arrested, they'll flee.' Bryson said judges and law enforcement officers 'all over the state are upset about it.'"
—JAMIE SATTERFIELD, Knoxville News-Sentinel, "Judges issue opinion: Change law," January 31, 2004

"Assistant D.A. John Gill said, 'If the officer, even if he wasn't there, if they've gotten the information that establishes probable cause, they can sign it, and then therefore a warrant can be issued.' But the judge says officers could open themselves up to liability issues if they swear to facts they didn't see. There are already some proposed bills to change the new law. The original intention of the law was to protect people falsely accused of a crime from having to automatically go to jail."
—Jim Ragonese, WBIR TV, "SOME LAW ENFORCEMENT OFFICIALS OPPOSE NEW LAW," 2/3/2004

affidavit of criminal complaint Federal criminal prosecution must begin with the affidavit of criminal complaint required by the Fourth Amendment and Rule 3 of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure. Without the affidavit of complaint, courts of the United States do not have subject matter jurisdiction, so whatever ensuing verdict, judgment and/or sentence there might be is a nullity, it is void and should be vacated.
—LawResearch-Registry.org, "Proper Federal Indictment Procedure"

prosecutor 1. A legal officer who represents the government in criminal proceedings. See DISTRICT ATTORNEY; UNITED STATES ATTORNEY; ATTORNEY GENERAL.
     special prosecutor A lawyer appointed to investigate, and, if justified, seek indictments in a particular case
2. a private person who institutes and carries on a legal action, esp. a criminal action. Also termed private prosecutor.
—Black's Law Dictionary, 7th Edition

Tennessee Code 40-38-111. Notifying victim of rights - Definitions.
     (a) Victims, under the provisions of the Tennessee Constitution, article I, § 35, have the right to be informed of proceedings and the right to be informed of each of the rights conferred upon such victims.
     (b) When a victim appears before a judicial commissioner, magistrate or general sessions court clerk or one of such clerk's duly sworn deputies to obtain an arrest warrant, such commissioner, magistrate, general sessions court clerk or such clerk's duly sworn deputy shall notify the victim of such victim's rights under the Tennessee Constitution, article I, § 35. The Tennessee victims coalition will provide, upon request, sufficient copies of the form or brochure to be used to provide notice to victims under this subsection (b).
     (c) If a law enforcement officer obtains an arrest warrant on behalf of a victim, the agency employing such officer shall notify the victim of such victim's rights under the Tennessee Constitution, article I, § 35, and of the first court date at which the defendant will be required to appear. The Tennessee victims coalition will provide, upon request, sufficient copies of the form or brochure to be used to provide notice to victims under this subsection.

Tennessee Code 40-7-101. Persons by whom arrests made.
     An arrest may be made either by:
     (1) An officer under a warrant;
     (2) An officer without a warrant; or
     (3) A private person.

Tennessee Code 40-7-109. Arrest by private person - Grounds.
     (a) A private person may arrest another:
     (1) For a public offense committed in the arresting person's presence;
     (2) When the person arrested has committed a felony, although not in the arresting person's presence; or
     (3) When a felony has been committed, and the arresting person has reasonable cause to believe that the person arrested committed it.
     (b) A private person who makes an arrest of another pursuant to the provisions of §§ 40-7-109 - 40-7-115 shall receive no arrest fee or compensation for such arrest.

Tennessee Code 40-7-110. Arrest by private person - Time.
     A private person may make an arrest for felony at any time.

Tennessee Code 40-7-111. Arrest by private person - Notice of grounds.
     A private person making an arrest shall, at the time of the arrest, inform the person arrested of the cause thereof, except when the person is in the actual commission of the offense, or when arrested on pursuit.

Tennessee Code 40-7-112. Arrest by private person - Notice of grounds.
     If the person to be arrested has committed a felony, and a private person, after notice of such person's intention to make the arrest, is refused admittance, the arresting person may break open an outer or inner door or window of a dwelling house to make the arrest.

Tennessee Code 40-7-113. Disposition of person arrested by private person.
     (a) A private person who has arrested another for a public offense shall, without unnecessary delay, take the arrested person before a magistrate or deliver the arrested person to an officer.
     (b) An officer may take before a magistrate, without a warrant, any person who, being engaged in the commission of a public offense, is arrested by a bystander and delivered to the officer, and anyone arrested by a private person as provided in §§ 40-7-109 - 40-7-112, and delivered to the officer.

Tennessee Code 39-14-105. Grading of theft.
     Theft of property or services is:

  1. A Class A misdemeanor if the value of the property or services obtained is five hundred dollars ($500) or less;
  2. A Class E felony if the value of the property or services obtained is more than five hundred dollars ($500) but less than one thousand dollars ($1,000);
  3. A Class D felony if the value of the property or services obtained is one thousand dollars ($1,000) or more but less than ten thousand dollars ($10,000);
  4. A Class C felony if the value of the property or services obtained is ten thousand dollars ($10,000) or more but less than sixty thousand dollars ($60,000); and
  5. A Class B felony if the value of the property or services obtained is sixty thousand dollars ($60,000) or more.
    [Acts 1989, ch. 591, § 1.]

Tennessee Department of Safety - Title and Registration FAQ
QUESTION: How do I request a printout, current record or complete history of my motor vehicle record by mail or in person?
ANSWER: Complete Form SF-1081 and send required fees for the information you are requesting. Send the form and a check or money order to the Title and Registration Division, 44 Vantage Way, Suite 160, Nashville, TN 37243-8050. You can obtain a form at the Title and Registration Division in Nashville or by sending a written request to Title and Registration at the above address.When filing in person, you must present a copy of your driver license or photo identification. All photocopies of motor vehicle records are certified by this Division.
QUESTION: How may I obtain a corrected Certificate of Title?
ANSWER: If after receiving a Tennessee Certificate of Title, the owner or lienholder discovers an error on the title, circle the incorrect information in red and write the correct information in red near the incorrect information. If the error was ours, we will issue a new corrected title at no charge. To verify our records, contact our Division at (615) 741-3101.

"'Enterprise' means any individual, sole proprietorship, partnership, corporation, business trust, union chartered under the laws of this state, or other legal entity, or any unchartered union, association or group of individuals associated in fact although not a legal entity, and it includes illicit as well as licit enterprises, AND GOVERNMENTAL, as well as other, entities."
—Racketeer and Corrupt Organizations Act (RICO), TN CODE 39-12-203 (state RICO Act) and US CODE TITLE 18, PART I, CHAPTER 96, Sec. 1961 (federal RICO Act)

See Also:

Tennessee Code - Towcrimes:

  • 39-12-101. Criminal attempt.
  • 39-12-102. Solicitation - Defenses disallowed.
  • 39-12-103. Criminal conspiracy.
  • 39-12-104. Renunciation defense.
  • 39-12-105. Incapacity, irresponsibility or immunity of party to attempt, solicitation or conspiracy - Defenses.
  • 39-12-106. Multiple convictions.
  • 39-12-107. Grading attempt, solicitation and conspiracy.
  • 39-12-201. Organized Crime. Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organization Act of 1989.
  • 39-12-202. Legislative intent.
  • 39-12-203. Definitions.
  • 39-12-204. Unlawful activities.
  • 39-12-205. Penalties.
  • 39-12-206. Civil proceedings - Injunctions - Forfeiture of property - Future criminal actions - Statute of limitations.
  • 39-12-207. RICO lien notice - Liens - Title or interest holders - Unauthorized conveyances.
  • 39-12-208. RICO lien notice - Term - Renewal - Release - Termination.
  • 39-12-209. Investigative agencies - Oaths - Subpoenas - Evidence.
  • 39-12-210. Remedies of creditors and innocent persons.
  • 39-14-103. Theft of property.
  • 39-14-112. Extortion.
  • 39-14-127. Deceptive business practices.
  • 39-14-401. Definitions for burglary and related offenses.
  • 39-14-402. Burglary.
  • 39-14-403. Aggravated burglary.
  • 39-14-404. Especially aggravated burglary.
  • 39-14-407. Trespass by motor vehicle.
  • 39-14-408. Vandalism.
  • 39-14-701. Possession of burglary tools.
  • 55-5-101. Stolen and recovered motor vehicles - Duties of law enforcement officers - Responsibilities attaching to wrecker, salvage and garage businesses - Penalties.
  • 55-5-102. Theft or embezzlement and recovery of registered vehicle - Notice required - Penalty.
  • 55-5-108. Records to be kept - Inspections - Contraband - Seizure of stolen property - Reclamation - Forfeiture.
  • 55-5-109. Penalties for sale or possession for sale of nonnumbered passenger cars or components.
  • 55-5-113. Fraudulent statements in application - Penalty.
  • 55-5-115. Misuse of evidences of registration a misdemeanor - Penalties.
  • 55-5-116. Altering, falsifying or forging evidences of title, assignments or plates a felony.
  • 55-5-117. Suspension or revocation of registrations, certificates of title, and nonresident permits - Causes.
  • 55-5-118. Suspending or revoking certificates or special plates of manufacturers, transporters or dealers, also temporary tags or permits.
  • 55-5-119. Evidences of registration to be returned by owner upon cancellation, suspension or revocation.
  • 55-5-120. Penalty for violations.
  • 55-5-121. Violation - Class E felony.
  • 55-5-122. Moving any motor vehicle located on private property unlawful - Exceptions.
  • 55-5-123. Penalties for violations.
  • 55-5-124. Treble damages.
  • 55-5-125. Abandoned and junked vehicle laws unaffected.
  • 55-5-126. Use of stolen plates - Penalty.
  • 55-5-127. Junked or salvaged motor vehicles - Sale or transfer of certificates of title, identification plates or license plates - Penalties.
  • 55-5-128. Seized or repossessed motor vehicles - Notice to sheriff.
  • 55-5-129. Impounded vehicles - Entry onto private property.
  • 55-5-130. Reporting theft of motor vehicle from bailee.
  • 55-5-201. Short title. Chop Shops - Sale of Vehicle Parts.
  • 55-5-202. Definitions.
  • 55-5-203. Violations and penalties.
  • 55-5-204. Seizure of property.
  • 55-5-205. Forfeiture of property.
  • 55-5-206. Civil liability, relief available, triple damages.
  • 55-16-101. Report of unclaimed vehicles - Unclaimed vehicles on residential property.
  • 55-16-102. Penalty for failure to report.
  • 55-16-103. Definitions.
  • 55-16-104. Authority to take possession of abandoned motor vehicles.
  • 55-16-105. Notification of owners and lienholders.
  • 55-16-106. Auction of abandoned, immobile or unattended motor vehicles.
  • 55-16-107. Garagekeepers and towing firms authorized to enforce lien.
  • 55-16-108. Disposal to demolishers.
  • 55-16-109. Duties of demolishers.
  • 55-16-110. [Repealed.]
  • 55-16-111. Restrictions on towing of vehicles.
  • 55-16-112. Written authorization required for towing or storage of motor vehicle.
  • 66-19-101. Lien for repairs to conveyances generally.
  • 66-19-102. Duration of lien.
  • 66-19-103. Garagekeeper's or towing firm's lien.
  • 66-19-104. Duty to inform consumer of rights.
  • 66-19-103. Garagekeeper's or towing firm's lien.
  • 55-23-101. Short title. Motor Vehicle Storage Act of 1980.
  • 55-23-102. Definitions.
  • 55-23-103. Fee for storage beyond 60 days - Consent or notice required.
  • 55-23-104. Notice of intent to charge fee beyond 60 days.


Knoxville Tennessee
Available in corrupt cities everywhere!

extreme      journalism

The news that's NOT fit to print is what makes the newspapers.
—Democratic mayor Will Rogers, America's favorite cowboy journalist


NEW MAYOR
NEEDED FOR MAJOR EAST TENNESSEE CITY

Respectful and responsive to voters. Call KNOX RECALL at 573-0339.

knoxville tennessee

     More Knoxville voters signed petition than voted for mayor. 100,000 Knox County land owners fighting annexation and doubled taxes can get their friends in City to vote. Mayor's chief at KPD seeks to warm mayor's bench in next selection. 25,000 Knox County votes got trashed in 2000—triple check registration and precinct. Or get US magistrate and US marshall to shut down polls. TN law says your vote counts no matter what precinct.

     Maybe then Knoxville's downtown drag and former Red Light District—Gay Street—will finally get a new name like Summit Hill did (aka Asylum Ave). Unless, of course, Ashe created and controlled his own Recall.

"The right to vote at any election. . . is denied. . . except for participation in rebellion, or other crime. . . REBELLION. Rebellion signifies the forcible opposition and resistance to the laws and process lawfully issued. If the rebellion amounts to treason, it is punished by the laws of the United States with death. If it be a mere resistance of process, it is generally punished by fine and imprisonment. INSURRECTION. A rebellion of citizens or subjects of a country against its government."
Articles 2 and 3, United States Consitution

TN AG re KnoxRecall
TN AG re Recall Elections
TN AG re Infamous Crimes
TN AG re Ousters

FOX NEWS on Eminent Domain Fraud

Secret Budget Surplus in CAFR

Valentine radio in Nashville on bogus income/sales tax increase in Tennessee

Great Smokey Mountains & 73 Million Acres Given to United Nations

"Smart Growth" is NO GROWTH and a BAN on ownership of real estate - Community Character Act — US Senate Bill 975 - US House Bill 1433 - Check BILL STATUS with THOMAS

Congress Decrees Building Codes & Land-Use Enforcement Nightmare

Nightmare Charter of United Nations Inc

Nightmare Martial Law US & TN Emergency Murder Power Act - FEMA & TEMA

The Dark Side

Ashe and Bush homosex photos?

Ashe and Bush Boners

Now we are stuck with billionaire oil baron Mayor Billy the Kid Haslam who ordered a property tax increase in 2004 when the average income dropped $15,000/year


NOx County & ORNL
DAILY SMOG FORCAST

     "Kicking Ashe"
—Demolican Randy Tyree's unofficial campaign slogan



PRINT YOUR OWN POSTER TO ADVERTISE THIS WEBSITE

     Politicians [are] a set of men who have interests aside from the interests of the people, and who, to say the most of them, are, taken as a mass, at least one long step removed from honest men.
President Abraham Lincoln (nightclubs owner, pot farmer and the 1st murdered Republican)


     William Miller, owner of Miller Industries, the world's largest towing manufacturer, and owner of RoadOne, the world's largest towing company, lives in Metro Knoxville area, 1 mile west of Farragut on US Highway 11. Miller also owns Browning Ferris Industries (BFI) and its so-called "competitor" Waste Management (WM) (together named Allied Waste) and scrapyard corporations with railroad access and international seaports across the USA as part of $15-Billion garbage corporation. Miller's partner, Ben McGovern and Cedar Bluff 24-Hour Towing, faced a class action lawsuit for illegal towing in Knoxville. Previous complaints against CBT with City Council and Wrecker Services Commission included overcharging and kidnapping. MODERN MOBS detailed BFI's "cooperation" with New York City prosecutors in the 1997 convictions of 25 BFI "subcontractors" as members of the Gambino and Genovese Mafias.

Judge William Miller died of Heart Attack on 4/12/76 at his desk when reviewing James Earl Ray's appeal for a New Trial in assassination of Dr Martin Luther King Jr in Memphis TN. Ray ought to have gotten an automatic new trial but the Courts refused. Miller was the second judge to die while reviewing Ray's appeal. Ray died in 1998 without ever getting a jury trial, but did win a Mock Trial with his lawyer, presidential candidate Mark Lane.

Judge William Miller, Campton, KY

MEDIA AWARENESS PROJECT - "Criminal courts in Brooklyn, New York City handled 5,694 misdemeanor cases in April 1999. But this April, just three months after the anti-narcotics plan, known as Operation Condor, went into effect, the number of misdemeanor cases had jumped to 10,470, officials said, an increase of almost 84percent. 'Everybody is weary,' said Judge William Miller, who oversees the criminal courts in Brooklyn. Operation Condor, which began on Jan. 17, was conceived as an effort to flush the narcotics trade from drug-ridden neighborhoods by flooding the streets with undercover officers. The program, which had resulted in 38,968 arrests through yesterday, was recently broadened to include a crackdown on quality-of-life offenses. The effect of Operation Condor on the Brooklyn criminal courts was first reported on Monday in The New York Law Journal. Susan Hendricks, deputy chief of the criminal division for Legal Aid Society, 'With Condor the police got millions of dollars for overtime and now they're asking for more. We didn't get a single extra penny.'"

Georges Bush are the Narcotics Warlords in the United States. Dozens of their White House staff were convicted for lying to Congress and the Federal Courts about their terrorist acts and narcotics trafficking and importation into USA during IRAN-CONTRA prosecutions. The ambassador to Costa Rica, Lewis Tambs, was expelled for using that embassy to import narcotics into USA and his deposition was taken by a Knoxville lawyer. 35 volumes of Congressional Hearings on Iran-Contra are available in the basement of public library of UT College of Law, more than the Warren Commission and Whitewater investigations combined. The Bush family is now worth over ONE TRILLION DOLLARS and is closely related to the British Royal family that ran the OPIUM TRADE WARS against China during the 1800s.


     Tow Times magazine helps 10,000 tow truck drivers learn the ropes on breaking into vehicles, how to get away with illegal towing (wink wink, nudge nudge) and how to steal their customers titles and vehicles. Knoxville tow truck driver/owner, Michael McGovern, promoted to national towing lawyer and DC lobbyist for deregulation, Tow Times director and editor of LegalEze. McGovern defended towing thieves in the Knoxville area caught by citizens' arrest red-handed by CITIZEN ARREST while stripping 7 stolen cars and selling large amounts of moonshine. Convicted felons, including scrapyard owner Joe Miller, sentenced zero jail time and still tow cars in Knoxville. Miller has same last name as William Miller, Knoxville based CEO of BFI, Waste Management, Miller Industries and RoadOne cartel with 20,000 garbage and towing trucks.

     http://www.towing.com/ and TOWING.NET help "tow truck drivers" learn tips on breaking into vehicles, sell "lockout tools" for breaking and entering vehicles, allow anyone to network with anyone interested in such matters.

GROOVY TOW SCAM STEALS THEIR OWN CUSTOMERS CARS ON NORTHSHORE DRIVE - Webmaster forced to cut lock off gate to remove car as 3 cops drove by without stopping, removed his car, then padlocked the gate with a new lock so car thieves could not enter their shady business the next day - Both businesses owned by the same person, Groovy Garden and Chop Shop Quonset Hut - Located 1 block from notorious JIM'S TOWING

      Man loses car, home, job over secret towing. Cedar Bluff Towing cartel has a frozen heart.

     Why place the city in another lawsuit wherre the outcome is fully against us? our plate is full as it is..we do not seek out more lawsuits.
—Mayor Victor Ashe, Yahoo Egroups K2K


DRIVER INTELLIGENCE

AMERICAN AUTOBAHN

The Book, The Dream, The Reality. As seen on the History Channel at a LEGAL 212MPH on a public highway. The most complete news archives and links for drivers. The life you save may be your own. Portal Page provides news and 200 PAGES OF FREE LEGAL TIPS for drivers. Webmastered by John Lee.


"TCA §55-8-115 - Upon all roadways any vehicle proceeding at leass than the normal speed of traffic at the time and place and under the conditions then existing shall be driven in the right-hand lane then available for traffic... except when overtaking and passing another vehicle proceeding in the same direction. TCA §55-8-103 - It is a class C misdemeanor for any person to do any act forbidden or fail to do any act required in this chapter."


      Internet site not flattering to local officials. Webmaster's car towed, stolen and destroyed by mayor's police 6 hours after Knoxville Journal phoned to ask permission to run webmaster's dangerous article about mayor's and police chief's approval of murder of a KPD police officer.

     John Lee...your tirade against the mayor seems interesting but i would remind you that the voters on 4 separate occasions have seen fit to elect Victor Ashe as Mayor...
"Victor Ashe", Yahoo K2K Egroups


     So what if 4% of Knoxvillians allegedly pick the mayor (not counting 100,000 "annexed" voters not allowed to vote, or 25,000 Knox County voters whose votes are rountinely trashed). Since last November, we all know the election "results" bear little or no resemblance to reality. Elections are easily bought in this part of the world, as Mae Owenby found out after declared the winner against a fatal-hit-and-run convict, senator Koella. So who are you, really? I find it difficult to believe the same individual I've watched in council meetings would bother speaking with anyone on the public side of the fence.
—John Lee, to "Victor Ashe", Yahoo K2K Egroups (Mayor Ashe refused Lee's request for a hearing with the Top Secret Wrecker Service Commission)


     Motorist Bill of Rights is the most-censored document in Knoxville and on University of Tennessee campus.

     Maximum prices for towing contracts with Municipal Corporation of Knoxville and University of Tennessee Knoxville Municipal Corporation.

     City of Knoxville charges $375 per day plus 30 days in prison for parking citations--in your own driveway! Alleged Building Codes violations used by bureauRats as excuse to illegally seize vehicles. No court hearing allowed, since no parking citation is issued. Cars never returned and resold without public auction. Same laws regarding "abandoned or inoperable" vehicles "allow" vehicles reported as stolen to be recovered by police and illegally "given" to towing companies without the owners' knowledge or compensation, who retitle them for free.

     East TN American Automobile Association asks for wrecker commission--claims tow truckers violate rules.

     Federal class action lawsuit in 2000-- John Lee et al vs City of Knoxville, Mayor Victor Ashe, Knoxville Police Department, Chief Phil Keith, Officer Ryan Flores and Sutherland Avenue Wrecker Service, et al. KPD and SAWS denied towing the car for 6 weeks, SAWS extorted a $700 tow bill in excess of its $15 contract price, KPD did not issue a parking ticket (which illegally denies a public hearing), KPD admitted on 911 audio tape that the car was legally parked, SAWS stole the CD player according to KPD Impoundment Report, car is totaled after sitting illegally in SAWS chop shop for over 1 year.

     State class action lawsuit in 2001-- Fagan et al vs Cedar Bluff 24-Hour Towing, et al. CBT is owned by the world's largest towing company, Miller Industries, with nearly 10,000 tow trucks. CBT contracted with Knoxville Municipal Corporation and University of Tennessee Knoxville Municipal Corporation, and overcharged its nonconsentual customers in excess of the contract price, often refusing to admit towings to customers and failing to account for cash income for tax records.

     RICO Towing Class Action settled in 2001-- Ralph Nader's and ATLA's Trial Lawyers for Public Justice kick butt in Virginia. Used car dealer, repo wreckers and Bog(us) finance company give up $17-Million, including $2.5-Million in plaintiff's attorneys fees. 3,000 dissatisfied customers average $1,500 cash judgment per person.

     The Court concludes that the Ordinance is unconstitutional insofar as it does not provide for a hearing by a neutral official before payment of towing and storage fees, and insofar as it provides for summary seizure of abandoned vehicles which are not blocking traffic. For the foregoing reasons, the defendants must be enjoined from further enforcement of the Ordinance.
HALE v. TYREE, US District Court, Knoxville, TN, 1979

     Dumb ass parking lot owner and tow trucker cause mass riots and class action in Texas.

      $100,000 judgment in St Louis class action towing case.

     Towing law leaves county flat--County Clerk's registry left high and dry by wreckers' auto auctions. Auto owners may be losing thousands of dollars as a result of a widely overlooked state law. Florida Statute 713.78 allows wrecker services to publicly auction unclaimed vehicles in order to recoup towing and storage fees.
Orlando Business Journal

     State governments pay car thieves up to $2,000 for every allegedly "abandoned or inoperable" car they steal (Vermont HB 377). How many other states do the same? In Tennessee, any vehicle can be alleged "abandoned or inoperable" so long as it is over 4 years old, regardless of operating condition or appearance (since THP never inspects the cars nor test drive them), and retitled for FREE. Stolen vehicles that are brand new can also be retitled sight-unseen as allegedly "totaled" via a crash. Specialty Equipment Market Association tries to water down forfeiture laws. Instead, these laws must all be scrapped. Free SEMA newsletter re legislative updates.

     Washington DC Municipal Corporation and its towing contractors illegally stole 12,000 "abandoned or inoperable" vehicles every year. This includes cars stolen out of people's own driveways. Class action lawsuit repaid thousands of crime victims of professional car thieves contracted to the DC government.

     City of Los Angeles and LAPD guilty in $200-Million RICO class action-- Municipal corporation learns what happens when its private SWATS run amuk. Lawsuit includes illegal towing and forfeitures by police. First police department successfully sued under RICO. Chief Darrel Gates paid himself $125,000 per year retirement as reward for convicted cops beating Rodney Glenn King, $1-Billion riots and 55 homicides after the world's most infamous traffic stop.

     New York City profits $356-million from parking citations annually, not counting tens of thousands of vehicle forfeitures. Mayor Rudolf Guilliani struts around his office declaring himself president, running for US Senate and having adulterous affairs with wives not his own, as well as ordering his cops to crack down on jaywalkers and sparking international terrorist reprisals. Meanwhile, the Mafia controls the docks, construction, clothing, trash, towing and Wall Street. NYPD cops shoot innocent people 50 times when they open their doors at home and arrested thousands who protested, including a former mayor. NYPD also let rapists videotape themselves for hours in Central Park, resulting in a $1-billion class action in June 2001.

     TV news crew goes undercover catching tow truckers paying kickbacks to parking lot security managers in California.

     At $13,000 per parking space, the cost of the recently completed Locust Street Garage, $80 million will build more than 6,000 spaces. Each parking space provided by public dollars in the Public Building Authority proposal will cost an estimated $47,645 because the proposed parking garages are both garages and free foundations for privately developed buildings. Maybe we could get more bang for our buck if we use the public dollars to build three times as many free parking spaces nearby instead of building the foundation for the office tower. That new free parking resource would also dramatically change the revitalization potential for many surrounding blocks of downtown Knoxville. Let's become Knoxville, the downtown that free parking built.
—Jim Giffen, Esq., Knoxville News Sentinel, "The answer to revitalizing downtown: free parking," 04/06/01


     Denver's parking management director, worked on the side in sales for a California company that manufactures parking payment machines. The company, VenTek International, is now bidding for a potential $3.5 million contract that Oglesby wants for 600 new "pay stations," high-tech boxes that meter up to 10 vehicles per station and accept credit cards. Oglesby, 42, was hired by Denver in June 2000 and makes $94,650 a year. The Canadian company he has done outside work for is Imperial Parking, which managed parking for the opening of Pacific Bell Park, where the San Francisco Giants play, said Dennis Royer, deputy manager of Denver's Public Works Department. Ogelsby investigated on claims he had at least five of his own parking tickets fixed The solar-powered, multi-space boxes would replace about one-fourth of the approximately 5,000 parking meters now in downtown. The boxes meter up to 10 vehicles per pay station. The current digital meters were installed over the past three years -- the last few "gray-headed" mechanical ones being pulled just this month -- at a cost of $2 million. Some of the old meters were in place for more than 20 years.

      The Safety Forum promotes motor vehicle product liability law and class actions to save millions of American lives. Get the real facts about the 1-percent of 1-percenters ers who win punitive damages.

      Should personal injury awards be taxed reducing winning victims' judgment to a mere 15%?

      Ralph Nader's censored Knoxville lecture on product liability law, deadly medical malpractice, deadly vehicle design and deadly corporate killers. Hear what the Knoxville News-Sentinel and Metro Pulse don't want YOU to think.

      Webmaster's interview with Ralph Nader as he hikes the Appalachian Trail to promote America's first museum on the law--not counting TN's Skopes Monkey Museum in downtown Dayton, the butt of moron jokes around the Western World since the last century.

      Dragons slain by law--New York Times quotes webmaster's interview with trail-walker Ralph Nader.

      Exploding the Pinto and Mustang Madness--Lee Iacocca makes one dollar for your life.

      GM Cost Benifit Analysis made GM rich off thousands of Crispy Critters until Billion dollar jury verdict against Ken Starr in 2000.

TRUE CRIMES
ON TORT DEFORM

Why we should save your life before it's too late.
1 I 2 I 3 I 4 I 5

     Q: How do I file a formal complaint against local police and the university re intentional unreporting of crimes?
     A: A complaint under the Clery Act (34 CFR Part 668) can not properly be filed against a local police department only an institution of higher education. A complaint against the University of Tennessee would need to be filed with the Atlanta regional office of the U.S. Department of Education at the address below. Complainants are not entitled to any portion of a Clery Act fine ($20,000 per incident of censorship).
—S. Daniel Carter, Vice President, Security On Campus, Inc.
Mr. Steve Shauer, Chief, Institutional Participation and Oversight, U.S. Dept. of Education Region IV, Sam Nunn Atlanta Federal Center, 61 Forsyth Street SW, Suite 19T40, Atlanta, GA 30303


     Mafia chauffeur: "They're behind us now, they figure you running some big, big enterprises right now. That's what it is. You know, with the garbage, and with an... and with incinerators now, and ah... with all that shit. Incineration is a big thing with us, the thing of the future. They figure that you got it, that you control it." Anthony Corallo replies: "They're right, you know." (boss of the Luchese crime family)
—bugged limosine, from report ORGANIZED CRIME IN THE WASTE HAULING INDUSTRY, by NY state Assemblyman Maurice Hinchey


     Market fundamentalists say the solution to half-baked deregulation is full deregulation, with no rules at all. That's frightening. "These theorists are like medieval bloodletters. If a dose of their free-market medicine doesn't cure the patient, they call for applying more leeches."
—Joe Stiglitz,former World Bank economist


     The United States is not nearly so concerned that its acts be kept secret from its intended victims as it is that the American people not know of them.
—U.S. Attorney General Ramsey Clark


     "The flag of the United States shall be thirteen horizontal stripes, alternate red and white; and the union of the flag shall be forty-eight stars, white in a blue field." ("Notes" add stars for Alaska and Hawaii)
4 US Code §4 (So why do all flags in court rooms have a gold fringe is used in military courts?)


ILLEGAL TOW CRIMES
HOW TO PROSECUTE

     Remember all those TV shows you watched about cops, detectives, lawyers and courts? With all that legal training, this will be a piece of cake!

PRINT CHECKLIST

PRINT ACLU CARD
MOTORIST BILL OF RIGHTS

CITIZENS ARREST INFO at AMERICAN AUTOBAHN Portal Page



     The power to punish for contempt conferred by this section may NOT be used to punish persons who fail to appear for traffic violations or parking violations.
TN CODE 29-9-108


     "Enterprise" means any individual, sole proprietorship, partnership, corporation, business trust, union chartered under the laws of this state, or other legal entity, or any unchartered union, association or group of individuals associated in fact although not a legal entity, and it includes illicit as well as licit enterprises, AND GOVERNMENTAL, as well as other, entities.
TN CODE 39-12-203 (RICO Act)


MOBBED UP MAYOR DALEY OF CHICAGO STEALS MILLIONS OF CARS

WARNING - THERE IS NO GOVERNMENT IN USA ONLY CORPORATIONS - CONSTITUTIONS NO LONGER EXISTS - LAWYERS MUST USE CONTRACT LAW INSTEAD - CLASS ACTIONS REQUIRE DOZENS OF WITNESSES AND PLAINTIFFS TO TESTIFY - BRITISH MARTIAL LAW EXISTS - USA IS DEFEATED AND FORECLOSED BY CITY OF LONDON INC - ALL COURTS ADMIRALTY COURTS UNDER FRCP - NOT ONLY WAS NO JURY ALLOWED BUT NO TRIAL WAS ALLOWED

     The district court granted summary judgment in favor of the City, and we affirm. The City of Chicago Municipal Code (the "Code") authorizes the City to tow and impound motor vehicles in various enumerated circumstances. Lot 6—the only impoundment lot about which the plaintiffs complain—is one of the City-owned impoundment lots. Between 1995 and 1999, a total of 181,911 vehicles were impounded at Lot 6, which covers five square blocks and has only one entrance. Otherwise, the lot is relatively inaccessible due to high chain-link fences and railroad track berms that surround its borders. The City of Chicago Municipal Code (the "Code") authorizes the City to tow and impound motor vehicles in various enumerated circumstances. Lot 6—the only impoundment lot about which the plaintiffs complain—is one of the City-owned impoundment lots. Between 1995 and 1999, a total of 181,911 vehicles were impounded at Lot 6, which covers five square blocks and has only one entrance. Otherwise, the lot is relatively inaccessible due to high chain-link fences and railroad track berms that surround its borders. The City disposes of unclaimed vehicles by compacting them and selling them for scrap, by selling the vehicles at an auction, or by retaining the vehicles for City use. Plaintiffs alleged that the City denied to ve-hicle owners that their vehicles were present at Lot 6 even though it knew or should have known that the vehicles were in fact present there. Gable or her boyfriend called Lot 6 every day for seven days inquiring about whether her vehicle was being impounded there. Pound personnel repeatedly told her that her vehicle was not there. Two weeks after Gable's vehicle was towed, a friend of Gable's who worked in another impoundment lot called Lot 6, and pound personnel told Gable's friend that Gable's vehicle was in fact located at Lot 6 and had been since the day it was towed. When Floriani arrived at Lot 6, he discovered that it had been damaged to such an extent that he decided to leave it there. When Moore's vehicle was towed from a friend's driveway, the person towing it told the friend that it was being towed to Lot 6. Thus, five days later, Moore went to a Chicago Police Department precinct, and a police officer entered Moore's license plate and VIN numbers into the Hot Desk System, but the system incorrectly indicated that Moore's vehicle had not been towed. For the next several weeks, Moore made inquiries to pound personnel about the where-abouts of his vehicle, and the personnel repeatedly told him that it was not located at Lot 6. a pound employee told Moore that it had been present there but had been disposed of a few days earlier. plaintiffs alleged that the City, through its agents, systematically broke into and entered vehicles towed to Lot 6, and stole property from these vehicles. During the class period, there were approximately 1,400 damage and theft claims filed with respect to vehicles towed to Lot 6. It is well settled that the City cannot be liable for the above actions through a theory of respondeat superior.
—U S Court of Appeals, 7 Circuit, No. 01-1941, GABLE v. CITY OF CHICAGO, a municipal corporation, CLASS ACTION (DECIDED JULY 8, 2002)


FEDERAL RESERVE BANK ROBBER BARONS

Wall Street Journal, Feb. 8, 1993, stated, "The current Fed structure is difficult to justify in a democracy. It's an oddly undemocratic institution."

CATO Institute, April 15, 1982: "It is the institution of the Federal Reserve System that is responsible for our monetary disorder."

Almost all U.S currency is "Federal Reserve Notes" of debt (falsely called "dollars"), owed to the Federal Reserve, and is borrowed into existence (except for Liberty Dollars). How can you pay the debt when you have to "borrow" the currency to pay the debt, FROM THE GUYS YOU ALREADY OWE? It is like paying off your VISA card using borrowed money... the interest just keeps growing, and no principal is ever paid!

It is a ponzi scheme that costs USA $1-Billion every day just in interest. It is not meant to be repaid. It is meant to bring Americans to ruin without bloodshed. This debt is owed by a "corporation" named "UNITED STATES INC", formed to do what the U.S. Constitution said the Federal Government could NOT do. Fed "creates" $1,000 worth of "debt certificates" with no assets behind the creation, just the "OK" of Congress, and distributes it to banks. The bank "Holds" the 10% reserve as operating capital ($100) and loans the rest out at 10% interest. The bank pockets $90 in interest, and accepts the $900 back as a deposit. The bank retains 10% of the $900 deposit as a reserve, and loans out the $810 at 10% interest. The process is repeated over and over, with "hard" assets pledged as collateral for these "loans". Thus, it starts with "no money" and ends up with houses, cars, land, silver, gold... real assets... and all it took was some ink, some paper, and abdication by Congress.

The Federal Reserve System was conceived in 1910 by a group of notorious robber barons at a then-secret meeting at J. P. Morgan's estate on Jekyl Island, Georgia. After three years of political machinations, Congress passed the Federal Reserve Act in 1913. Soon after its formation, the management of the Fed created the conditions that led to the depression of the 1930s. It has presided over the loss of the gold backing of our money, and the consequent loss of about 90% of the value of the dollar. The government had no debt when the Federal Reserve Act was passed in 1913.

Who owns the stock of the Federal Reserve Banks? The dynastic families of the ruling World Order, internationalists who are loyal to no race, religion, or nation. They are families such as the Rothschilds, the Warburgs, the Schiffs, the Rockefellers, the Harrimans, the Morgans and other elites.

Can I buy this stock? No. The Federal Reserve Act stipulates that the stock of the Federal Reserve Banks cannot be bought or sold on any stock exchange. It is passed on by inheritance as the fortune of the "big rich". Almost half of the owners of Federal Reserve Bank stock are not Americans.

Is the Internal Revenue Service a governmental agency? No. Although listed as part of the Treasury Department, the IRS is actually a private collection agency for the Federal Reserve System. It originated as the Black Hand in mediaeval Italy, collectors of debt by force and extortion for the ruling Italian mob families. All personal income taxes collected by the IRS are required by law to be deposited in the nearest Federal Reserve Bank.

William J. Benson, criminal investigator for the Illinois Department of Revenue: "There is not one state -- not one -- that has ratified the 16th Amendment to the United States Constitution. In order for the federal government to collect anything from you, they must have a law. The 16th Amendment is what they collect the tax on. And I have proven beyond a doubt with 17,000 certified, notarized documents that not one state out of the 48 has ratified the law. They have all rejected it. People are scared to take deductions because of their fear. We've got a scared society. Now we need to go to the next step. We need full-blown congressional hearings."

Joseph R. (Joe) Banister, a former IRS Criminal Investigation Division Special Agent: "I'm beginning to understand that the only reason people go to jail is fear, intimidation, and ignorance of the law. They use raw emotion -- rather than finding out whether the laws are truly mandatory. The prosecution isn't about to offer to the jury that one of the reasons a defendant didn't file his tax form is because he (the defendant) has researched it and found out it isn't required. The cases can be read in any law library, they haven't been overruled. I had taken this job thinking I'd be wearing the white hat, and I slowly found out I was not wearing the white hat. My gosh, what am I part of? I'm just trying to tell people the truth. People get mad if their auto mechanic overcharges them by 50 bucks. If they find out the whole darn income tax system is a big fraud, I'm hoping they'll get mad enough to do something about it."

Can Congress abolish the Federal Reserve System? Yes. The last provision of the Federal Reserve Act of 1913, Sec. 30, states, "The right to amend, alter or repeal this Act is expressly reserved." This language means that Congress can at any time move to abolish the Federal Reserve System, or buy back the stock and make it part of the Treasury Department.

On May 23, 1933, Congressman Louis T. McFadden, Chairman of the Banking and Currency Committee, brought formal charges against the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve Bank system, The Comptroller of the Currency and the Secretary of United States Treasury for numerous criminal acts, including but not limited to, CONSPIRACY, FRAUD, UNLAWFUL CONVERSION, AND TREASON.

Congressman McFadden: "Mr. Chairman, we have in this Country one of the most corrupt institutions the world has ever known. I refer to the Federal Reserve Board and the Federal Reserve Banks, hereinafter called the Fed. The Fed has cheated the Government of these United States and the people of the United States out of enough money to pay the Nation's debt. The depredations and iniquities of the Fed has cost enough money to pay the National debt several times over. This evil institution has impoverished and ruined the people of these United States, has bankrupted itself, and has practically bankrupted our Government. Some people who think that the Federal Reserve Banks United States Government institutions. They are private monopolies which prey upon the people of these United States for the benefit of themselves and their foreign customers; foreign and domestic speculators and swindlers; and rich and predatory money lender. In that dark crew of financial pirates there are those who would cut a man's throat to get a dollar out of his pocket; there are those who send money into states to buy votes to control our legislatures; there are those who maintain International propaganda for the purpose of deceiving us into granting of new concessions which will permit them to cover up their past misdeeds and set again in motion their gigantic train of crime."

Mr. TRAFICANT, US Congress, March 27, 2001: "Mr. Speaker, in 1998, Congress reformed the IRS and included two of my provisions. The first transferred the burden of proof from the taxpayer to the IRS; the second required judicial consent before the IRS could seize our property, and the results are now staggering. Property seizures dropped from 10,037 to 161 in the entire country. The IRS had a license to steal, and they were stealing 10,000 properties a year. And if that is not enough to tax our gallbladders, the IRS is now complaining the new law is too tough. Beam me up here. It is time to tell these crybaby IRS thieves that we are going to pass a 15 percent flat sales tax and abolish them altogether. I yield back what should be the next endangered species in the United States of America: The Internal Rectal Service."

Mr. TRAFICANT, US Congress, July 18, 2001: "The IRS said last year's 81 percent error rate dropped to only 73 percent this past year. Unbelievable. The Internal Rectal Service screws up 73 percent of the time and then brags about it. If that is not enough to cause your 1040 to crepitate, IRS agents gave the wrong advice to taxpayers only 50 percent of the time last year, according to an investigation. Beam me up. The IRS does not need more workers; the IRS does not need more money. These stumbling, fumbling, bumbling mistake-prone nincompoops have got to go. I yield back the need to pass the Tauzin-Traficant 15 percent flat retail sales tax, abolish the income tax, and abolish these nincompoops at the IRS."

H. J. RES. 66, US Congress, October 3, 2001: JOINT RESOLUTION Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States to abolish the Federal income tax. Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled (two-thirds of each House concurring therein), That the following article is proposed as an amendment to the Constitution of the United States, which shall be valid to all intents and purposes as part of the Constitution when ratified by the legislatures of three-fourths of the several States within seven years after the date of its submission for ratification: `Three years after the ratification of this article of amendment, the sixteenth article of amendment to the Constitution of the United States is repealed, and the Congress shall have no power to lay and collect taxes on incomes, except in time of war declared by the Congress.'.

H. J. RES. 45, US Congress, April 25, 2001: "Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States relative to abolishing personal income, estate, and gift taxes and prohibiting the United States Government from engaging in business in competition with its citizens."


knoxville tennessee
LAST DRIVE IN

Tennessee Victim/Witness Handbook

Arrest Warrants

Most criminal cases begin when one person signs an arrest warrant against another person accusing that person of a crime. An Arrest Warrant is a document which formally charges a person with having committed a crime. Persons charged with crimes are referred to as defendants. A warrant also authorizes law enforcement officers to arrest the person against whom it is issued. In Tennessee, arrest warrants are usually obtained by going to the appropriate court clerk's office and requesting that a warrant be issued.

Before a warrant may be issued, Tennessee law requires that the clerk or deputy clerk take an affidavit (a sworn statement of facts) from the person requesting that the warrant be issued. This means that the person requesting the warrant will be asked to relate the facts of the crime to the clerk and then will be required to swear or affirm that those facts are true.

Please understand that the clerk is required by law to obtain this information before issuing the warrant and that when the clerk asks you additional questions he or she is not being nosy but is simply trying to make certain your warrant is done correctly. Some districts require that a case be investigated by some law enforcement agency prior to a warrant being issued.

Misdemeanors & Felonies

Crimes in Tennessee are divided into two categories. You will hear crimes referred to as either misdemeanors or felonies. A MISDEMEANOR is a crime punishable by a fine or confinement in the county jail for eleven months and twenty-nine days or less. A FELONY is a crime punishable by imprisonment for a period of one year or more in a state penitentiary. Felonies are considered more serious than misdemeanors, and as you read through this web site you will notice that the procedures for dealing with the two are sometimes different.

General Sessions Court

When a person is charged with a misdemeanor, the general sessions court judge has authority to conduct a trial to determine the guilt or innocence of the defendant. Before conducting such a trial, however, the general sessions judge must obtain permission from both the defendant and the district attorney. This is because both the defendant and the State of Tennessee have a right to a trial by jury. Remember there are no juries in general sessions court. Usually, in misdemeanor cases, the defendant chooses to be tried by the judge alone, and the State agrees to allow this. If the defendant is found guilty, he has a right to appeal the judge's decision to the circuit court and have an entirely new trial before a jury there. When this happens, witnesses may have to repeat their testimony in the jury trial.

If the general sessions judge finds the defendant not guilty, the trial is over and the defendant cannot be tried again for that offense. This would be double jeopardy. The state does not have the right to appeal a judge's decision that a defendant is not guilty.

Arraignment at General Sessions Court

The general sessions judge does not have the jurisdiction to determine guilt or innocence in felony cases. Felony cases must be heard in the circuit court. Felony cases do begin in general sessions court, however, with a procedure called arraignment and something called a preliminary hearing.

The ARRAIGNMENT is the process by which the defendant is advised by the judge of the charge(s) against him/her and of his/her right to be represented by an attorney. If the Defendant is indigent, the court will appoint an attorney (usually the public defender) to represent him/her. Also at the general sessions arraignment, which usually is the defendant's first court appearance, the judge will determine whether and under what conditions the defendant will be released until his trial. This usually results in the general sessions judge setting bail for the defendant. In Tennessee the law provides that the only legal purpose of bail is to insure that the defendant will appear in court on the scheduled date. BECAUSE OF THIS RESTRICTION, THE AMOUNT OF BAIL SET DOES NOT NECESSARILY REFLECT THE SERIOUSNESS OF THE OFFENSE CHARGED AGAINST THE DEFENDANT OR THE DEFENDANT'S DANGEROUSNESS TO SOCIETY. Only the legislature can correct this situation. The judge is required by law, however, to set bail in most cases.

Preliminary Hearing

For serious crimes, known as felonies, cases must be scheduled for what is known as a preliminary hearing in the general sessions court. At the PRELIMINARY HEARING the judge will listen to testimony from witnesses to determine whether the evidence presented is sufficient to transfer the case to the circuit court for a trial. This transferring is called "binding the case over." Defendants are also entitled to preliminary hearings in misdemeanor cases if they demand them, but usually a defendant charged with a misdemeanor will "waive" or give up his/her right to a preliminary hearing and allow the general sessions judge to try him/her without a jury. The State must present enough proof at a preliminary hearing to show that there is "probable cause" to believe the defendant committed the crime with which he or she is charged. PROBABLE CAUSE is a legal term for the amount of proof which must be presented at a preliminary hearing. Generally speaking, probable cause is shown when the proof shows that the defendant "probably' committed the crime with which he/she is charged. It is usually necessary for all witnesses to appear at the preliminary hearing.

Grand Jury

A case transferred to circuit court by "binding over" must then be presented to the GRAND JURY, a group of thirteen citizens chosen from the jury panel. One of these thirteen is the fore person and will preside over the grand jury. The grand jury hears testimony from witnesses in a private session. Neither the defendant nor his lawyer will be present at the grand jury hearing. A representative of the district attorney general's office may be present when witnesses present their testimony, but the grand jury's voting must be done in secret. If twelve of the thirteen grand jurors believe a crime was committed by the defendant, they will charge or " indict" the defendant for that crime. The formal charge by the grand jury is called an INDICTMENT. Sometimes this charge is also referred to as a "true bill". When the grand jury refuses to indict someone, its action is sometimes referred to as a "no true bill." When the Grand Jury returns a "no true bill' against a defendant, then that person cannot be brought to trial.

Arraignment at Circuit Court

Following indictment by the grand jury, a defendant is formally notified of the grand jury's action at a circuit court arraignment. You may recall that the defendant has already been arraigned once in the general sessions court. Nevertheless, Tennessee law requires that this process be repeated in the circuit court, this time by the circuit court judge. The judge will advise the defendant as to the charges brought against him by the grand jury and will also review or set bail as appropriate. The defendant will then be ordered to reappear on a later date known as appearance day. If the Defendant is indigent, the court will appoint an attorney (usually the public defender) to represent him/her.

Appearance Day at Circuit Court

Prior to each term of court, the circuit judge will review every pending criminal court case to determine which cases will be heard that term. Defendants and their lawyers are required to be present on this day, but victims and witnesses are not required to be present. On appearance day, the judge will set cases for trial unless the defendants involved plead guilty. As mentioned before, victims and witnesses are not required to attend this proceeding but are welcome to do so if they wish.

The Jury Trial In Circuit Court

If a defendant does not plead guilty on appearance, day his/her case will be set for trial. Most trials in the circuit court are heard before a jury of twelve men and women, although occasionally, cases are heard by a judge sitting alone without a jury. The decision as to whether a case will be heard by a jury or a judge sitting alone will be made by the defendant and the lawyers trying the case.

If there is a jury trial the district attorney or an assistant district attorney will present evidence to the jury by questioning witnesses, and if appropriate, by presenting physical objects, photographs and written documents. The defense attorney will also have the right to question or "cross-examine" those witnesses and may also present evidence and witnesses of his/ her own, although he/she has no obligation to do so. The defendant may take the stand and testify if he/she chooses to do so. He/she is not legally required to do so, however, because the State cannot force a defendant to testify.

In order for a defendant to be found guilty, every single one of the twelve jurors must decide that the defendant is guilty beyond a reasonable doubt of the crime charged. This is more than the probable cause requirement at the preliminary hearing.

What Happens After The Trial

If the defendant is found not guilty, the case is over, and the defendant is free to go as he/she wishes. The state has no right to appeal a not guilty verdict and is constitutionally prohibited from trying a defendant again for the same offense. This would be what is sometimes referred to as double jeopardy.

If the defendant is found guilty, the judge will schedule a sentencing hearing and will also order the Department of Corrections to conduct a pre-sentence investigation to help the judge determine what sentence is appropriate. As part of this investigation, a probation officer may contact victims ask questions about the case and its impact on their lives. He/she will be especially interested in the physical or emotional harm a victim may have suffered as a result of the defendants actions. Please provide as much information to the probation officer as you can.

The Sentencing Process

At the sentencing hearing the judge must sentence the defendant within a very limited and specific framework set out by the state legislature. Possible punishments vary from one offense to another and cannot be changed except by legislative action. Someone from the District Attorneys office will advise you of the punishment ranges of the case in which you are involved. Possible sentences might include imprisonment, confinement in the county jail, community service, probation, fines and restitution.

What Punishment Will The Defendant Receive

One of the first questions most victims ask concerning their cases usually concerns the amount and kind of punishment the defendant can be expected to receive in court. Unfortunately, that question is a complex one and is contingent upon many factors. You must understand that IN ORDER TO SEND A CRIMINAL TO PRISON IN TENNESSEE, THE PROSECUTOR'S OFFICE MUST PROVE MORE THAN JUST THAT THE DEFENDANT COMMITTED THE CRIME CHARGED AGAINST HIM. Our appellate courts have ruled that the District Attorney must also prove that a given defendant does not deserve probation or some other less severe punishment than confinement. As strange as it may seem, that is the state of the law under which we live. Because of this, many factors will influence the actual type of punishment an offender receives. These factors include, but are not limited to, a defendant's prior criminal history, his/her work record, his/her family situation, whether or not restitution has been or can be made, and finally, the conditions under which the crime was committed.

Complicating the picture even further is the EXTREMELY OVERCROWDED CONDITION OF OUR CORRECTION SYSTEM. Our prisons and jails in Tennessee are literally overflowing. Federal Court orders have placed a ceiling, or cap, on the number of prisoners we can confine at any given time. Because the State often exceeds that cap, the Department of Corrections many times releases a prisoner in order to make room for a new defendant. Since approximately seventy percent of the people in prison today are violent criminals, this means the likelihood of a violent person being released each time we send a defendant to prison is extremely high.

Because of this, prosecutors try to dispose of the cases in there district in a way which preserves our correctional resources as best they can be preserved while still protecting our counties from dangerous people.

Please understand that prosecutors will do everything that they legally can do to see that persons who commit crimes in Tennessee are punished appropriately and that their punishments reflect the seriousness of the crimes committed. In doing that, however, they must abide by the laws of Tennessee. They must also take into account the fact that our penitentiary system is overflowing. Whatever they decide in that regard, you can be assured they will make every effort to inform you well in advance of any actions they plan to take. Even though you don't have the final say, you can also be assured that they welcome your comments and suggestions as to what you personally think would be an appropriate disposition of your case.

Length Of Prison Terms In Tennessee

It would be less than honest if it was not pointed out that criminals sentenced to prison terms in Tennessee serve substantially less than is generally believed. In the usual case a defendant will be released after serving less than thirty percent of the stated sentence imposed against him/her. The reason for this is that due to the overcrowded condition of the Tennessee prison system, a defendant is eligible for release after he has served a small percentage of his sentence. The decision as to when to release a given defendant is made at the location of the defendant's confinement by the Tennessee Board of Paroles.

PLEASE UNDERSTAND THAT NEITHER THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY'S OFFICE NOR THE JUDGE HAS ANYTHING WHATSOEVER TO DO WITH THE EARLY RELEASE OF PRISONERS.

Parole Eligibility

All prisoners, including those sentenced to life sentences, are eligible to be released on parole at some time. The District Attorney's office will make every effort to honestly and accurately advise you as to when any given defendant will become eligible for parole. Should the Tennessee Board of Probation and Paroles grant a defendant's release, the defendant will be assigned a parole officer who will monitor his/her actions and maintain certain imposed rules until the expiration of the defendant's original sentence. Should the defendant defy the conditions of parole, the balance of his sentence may be reinstated, and he may be returned to prison. This decision is made by the Board of Probation and Paroles.

Alternative Sentencing Possibilities

Occasionally a defendant will be sentenced by the judge to what is known as a community corrections or alternative sentencing program. Such programs are very closely monitored by probation officers, and persons serving such sentences are required to meet very stringent requirements as to employment and activity. Generally only non-violent offenders are placed in this type of program. Should the judge sentence the defendant in your case to any sort of alternative sentencing program someone from my office will explain to you the requirements the defendant must meet.

Negotiated Pleas; Will My Case Be Plea-Bargained

The district attorney and the defendant, through his defense attorney, will frequently reach an agreement prior to trial as to the term of sentence a defendant will receive if he pleads guilty. This agreement will then be presented to the judge, usually on appearance day. There are a number of reasons why this practice is sometimes necessary. If you are concerned about your case being "plea bargained away, please contact the District Attorney's office personally.

Return Of Your Property

Sometimes it is necessary for law enforcement agencies to hold personal property as evidence until trial, but this is seldom necessary. SHOULD YOUR PROPERTY BE IN THE CUSTODY OF LAW ENFORCEMENT OFFICERS AND YOU ARE IN NEED OF ITS RETURN PRIOR TO TRIAL, PLEASE CALL THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY'S OFFICE FOR ASSISTANCE.

Restitution - Reimbursement For Your Losses

As a victim of a crime, any information regarding your injuries or out-of-pocket losses resulting from the crime should be brought to the attention of the victim witness coordinator in the District Attorney's office. This information will be made known to the judge at the time of sentencing. In appropriate cases the judge may order the defendant to reimburse you for your financial loss as a part of the sentence imposed. This restitution will then be collected and monitored by the circuit court clerk and the defendant's probation officer. This way you will not have to have any personal contact with the defendant.

Contact With The Defense Attorney

The attorney for the defendant may contact you to discuss your testimony. He or she has a right to do so. There is no reason not to discuss the case with the defense attorney, but you have the right to do so on your own terms. If you desire, someone from the District Attorney's office will arrange to be present during such a conversation. IF THE DEFENDANT CONTACTS YOU, PLEASE LET THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY'S OFFICE KNOW IMMEDIATELY. This is highly irregular and you are under no obligation to speak to him/her.

Victim Impact Statement

In felony cases a victim is entitled to be present at the sentencing hearing and may make a statement to the court, orally or in writing, as to the impact of the crime on his or her life. Some people feel comfortable doing this; others do not. Whether or not you make such a statement is entirely up to you. the District Attorney's office would be glad to discuss this with you personally, if you wish.

Witness Fees

All subpoenaed witnesses who appear in court are entitled to a small witness fee, whether or not they actually testify. This fee is for travel expenses; it is not reimbursement for lost wages. After you have testified, the victim-witness coordinator or the circuit court clerk's office will assist you in obtaining this fee.

Handbook courtesy of Clayburn Peeples, District Attorney General, Twenty-Eighth Judicial District of Tennessee. Copyright 1996 - 1997, District Attorney General, Twenty-Eighth Judicial District of Tennessee. Updated 06-01-97.


Criminal Resource Manual

US Attorneys Manual
Department of Justice
October 1997

652 Statute of Limitations for Conspiracy

Conspiracy is a continuing offense. For statutes such as 18 U.S.C. § 371, which require an overt act in furtherance of the conspiracy, the statute of limitations begins to run on the date of the last overt act. See Fiswick v. United States, 329 U.S. 211 (1946); United States v. Butler, 792 F.2d 1528 (11th Cir. 1986). For conspiracy statutes which do not require proof of an overt act, such as RICO (18 U.S.C. § 1961) or 21 U.S.C. § 846, the government must allege and prove that the conspiracy continued into the limitations period. The crucial question in this regard is the scope of the conspiratorial agreement, and the conspiracy is deemed to continue until its purpose has been achieved or abandoned. See United States v. Northern Imp. Co., 814 F.2d 540 (8th Cir. 1987); United States v. Coia, 719 F.2d 1120 (11th Cir. 1983), cert. denied, 466 U.S. 973 (1984).

An individual's "withdrawal" from a conspiracy starts the statute of limitations running as to that individual. "Withdrawal" from a conspiracy for this purpose means that the conspirator must take affirmative action by making a clean breast to the authorities or communicating his or her disassociation to the other conspirators. See United States v. Gonzalez, 797 F.2d 915 (10th Cir. 1986).

654 Statute of Limitations and RICO

The Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations ("RICO") statute, 18 U.S.C. § 1961 et seq., requires that state crimes used as predicate offenses be "chargeable under state law." The federal courts have uniformly held that regardless of the running of the state statute of limitations, a defendant is still "chargeable" with the state offense within the meaning of 18 U.S.C. § 1961(1)(A). See cases cited in United States v. Licavoli, 725 F.2d 1040, 1046-47 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 467 U.S. 1252 (1984). The reference to state law in the statute is simply to define the conduct, and is not meant to incorporate state procedural law.

956 RICO Prosecutions -- 18 U.S.C. §§ 1961-68

"Although it took some time before federal prosecutors began to use RICO expansively, it is now widely used against many types of crime, including white collar crime." O. Obermaier and R. Morvillo, White Collar Crime: Business and Regulatory Offenses, § 11.03, at 11-6 (Rel. 2, 1991). RICO's prohibited activities are provided at 18 U.S.C. § 1962. Violations of either Section 1341 or 1343 or both may be used by prosecutors as the predicate acts necessary to establish a RICO violation. See 18 U.S.C. § 1961(1)(B) ("racketeering activity" defined to include "any act which is indictable under . . . . section 1341 (relating to mail fraud), section 1343 (relating to wire fraud) . . . .").

If the other requisite elements of a RICO violation can be established, a defendant who has committed the predicate acts of mail or wire fraud may be subjected to more severe sanctions than those imposed for a mail or wire fraud conviction. For example, the United States Sentencing Guidelines provide that the minimum base offense level for unlawful conduct relating to a RICO conviction is 19. U.S.S.G. § 2E1.1. In addition, the government may seek civil (18 U.S.C. § 1964) or criminal (18 U.S.C. § 1963(a)(1)-(3)) forfeiture of assets. "Courts have generally held that RICO criminal forfeiture is mandatory upon the defendant's conviction." O. Obermaier and R. Morvillo, § 11.05, at 11-22 (citing cases from the Third, Fourth, Fifth, Ninth, and Eleventh Circuits). The property subject to forfeiture includes "real property" and "tangible and intangible personal property." See § 1963(b).

For Department policy relating to RICO prosecutions see USAM 9-110.000, et seq.

"'Enterprise' means any individual, sole proprietorship, partnership, corporation, business trust, union chartered under the laws of this state, or other legal entity, or any unchartered union, association or group of individuals associated in fact although not a legal entity, and it includes illicit as well as licit enterprises, AND GOVERNMENTAL, as well as other, entities."
—Racketeer and Corrupt Organizations Act (RICO), TN CODE 39-12-203 (state RICO Act) and US CODE TITLE 18, PART I, CHAPTER 96, Sec. 1961 (federal RICO Act)

1302 Motor Vehicle and Aircraft Theft -- Definition of "Stolen"

The term "stolen" should not be construed in the technical sense of common law larceny. Stolen covers all theft offenses regardless of whether such was in the nature of larceny, embezzlement, or false pretenses. See United States v. Turley, 352 U.S. 407 (1957). See also Bell v. United States, 462 U.S. 356 (1983). What is required is a felonious taking or conversion of another's property right in the vehicle regardless of how the perpetrator may originally have come into possession of the vehicle. Although property interests obviously include the concepts of "title" and "possession," a financial company's "secured interest" in the vehicle has been deemed a sufficient property interest in the vehicle when the owner disposed of the vehicle contrary to the loan agreement. See United States v. Bunch, 399 F. Supp. 1156 (D.Md.), aff'd, 542 F.2d 629 (4th Cir. 1976). However, the statute does not cover situations where a person, engaging in a fraud upon the insurance company in concert with the vehicle's owner, disposes of a vehicle and the owner reports the vehicle as stolen since the insurance company had no property interest in the vehicle at the time of its disposal. See United States v. Bennett, 665 F.2d 16 (2d Cir. 1981). Moreover, the vehicle must retain its stolen character during the transportation under 18 U.S.C. § 2312 or the receipt, possession, concealment, storing, bartering, selling or disposal under 18 U.S.C. § 2313. It has been held that total recovery by law enforcement or the owner's agent, in contrast with merely being placed under observation by law enforcement, will terminate the stolen character. See United States v. Muzii, 676 F.2d 919 (2d Cir. 1982); United States v. Dove, 629 F.2d 325 (4th Cir. 1980). However, in the Violent Crime and Law Enforcement Act of 1994, Pub. Law 103-322, Congress enacted a provision, now codified at 18 U.S.C § 21, which provides that for purposes of title 18, whenever it is an element of an offense that property was stolen and defendant knew of its stolen character, such element can be established as a result of an "official representation" of its stolen character.

1367 Motor Vehicle Titles as "Securities"

The definition of the term "securities" in 18 U.S.C. § 2311 specifically includes a "valid or blank motor vehicle title." Consequently, a RICO prosecution under 18 U.S.C. § 1961 et seq., can be predicated on the interstate transportation of a blank counterfeited motor vehicle title as well as on the interstate transportation of a completed counterfeit motor vehicle title.

The precise meaning of "valid" is not clear. Regardless of the meaning of "valid," the definition of security in 18 U.S.C. § 2311, however, is rendered basically insignificant by 18 U.S.C. § 513 which makes the counterfeiting or forging of state securities (including their blank forms) a federal crime. Since the definition of "security" in § 513 includes a certificate of interest in tangible property or a blank form thereof, it is now a federal offense to counterfeit or forge a motor vehicle title or a blank form thereof. No interstate transportation of the counterfeit or forged motor vehicle title is required.

It should be noted, however, that 18 U.S.C. § 513 is not a predicate offense for a RICO prosecution, while violations of 18 U.S.C. §§ 2314 and 2315 do qualify as predicate offenses.

1369 Chop Shops

Title 18 U.S.C. § 2322 makes it an offense to knowingly own, operate, maintain, or control a chop shop. The term "chop shop" is defined as any building, lot, facility, or other structure or premise where one or more persons engage in receiving, concealing, destroying, disassembling, dismantling, reassembling, or storing any passenger motor vehicle part which has been unlawfully obtained in order to alter, counterfeit, deface, destroy, disguise, falsify, forge, obliterate, or remove the identity, including the vehicle identification number or derivative thereof, of such vehicle or vehicle part and to distribute, sell, or dispose of such vehicle or vehicle part in interstate or foreign commerce.

Because motor vehicle parts tend to lose their identity as stolen property after being severed from the vehicle, and because chop shop operators often dispose of stolen parts locally, rather than in interstate commerce, evidence of interstate distribution of stolen parts is difficult to obtain. Consequently, 18 U.S.C. § 2322 has been rarely used. Chop shop operators may be prosecutable under 18 U.S.C. §§ 511, 2313, and 2321.

2403 Hobbs Act -- Extortion By Force, Violence, or Fear

In order to prove a violation of Hobbs Act extortion by the wrongful use of actual or threatened force, violence, or fear, the following questions must be answered affirmatively:

  1. Did the defendant induce or attempt to induce the victim to give up property or property rights?

    "Property" has been held to be "any valuable right considered as a source of wealth." United States v. Tropiano, 418 F.2d 1069, 1075 (2d Cir. 1969) (the right to solicit garbage collection customers). "Property" includes the right of commercial victims to conduct their businesses. See United States v. Zemek, 634 F.3d 1159, 1174 (9th Cir. 1980) (the right to make business decisions and to solicit business free from wrongful coercion) and cited cases). It also includes the statutory right of union members to democratically participate in union affairs. See United States v. Debs, 949 F.2d 199, 201 (6th Cir. 1991) (the right to support candidates for union office); United States v. Teamsters Local 560, 550 F. Supp. 511, 513-14 (D.N.J. 1982), aff'd, 780 F.2d 267 (3rd Cir. 1985) (rights guaranteed union members by the Labor-Management Reporting and Disclosure Act, 29 U.S.C. § 411).

  2. Did the defendant use or attempt to use the victim's reasonable fear of physical injury or economic harm in order to induce the victim's consent to give up property?

    A defendant need not create the fear of injury or harm which he exploits to induce the victim to give up property. See United States v. Duhon, 565 F.2d 345, 349 and 351 (5th Cir. 1978) (offer by employer to pay union official for labor peace held to be "simply planning for inevitable demand for money" by the union official under the circumstances); United States v. Gigante, 39 F.3d 42, 49 (2d Cir. 1994), vacated on other grounds and superseded in part on denial of reh'g, 94 F.3d 53 (2d Cir. 1996) (causing some businesses to refuse operations with the victim sufficiently induced the victim's consent to give up property, consisting of a right to contract freely with other businesses, as long as there were other businesses beyond defendants' control with whom the victim could do business).

    Moreover, attempted extortion may include an attempt to instill fear in a federal agent conducting a covert investigation or a defendant "made of unusually stern stuff." See United States v. Gambino, 566 F.2d 414, 419 (2d Cir. 1977) (argument that FBI agent pretending to be extortion victim could not be placed in fear is not a defense to attempted extortion of the agent); see also United States v. Ward, 914 F.2d 1340, 1347 (9th Cir. 1990) (an attempt to instill fear included a demand for money from a victim who knew that the defendant was only pretending to be a federal undercover agent when he threatened the victim with prosecution unless money was paid).

    However, the payment of money in response to a commercial bribe solicitation, that is, under circumstances where the defendant does not threaten the victim with economic harm, but only offers economic assistance in return for payment to which the defendant is not entitled, is not sufficient to prove extortion by fear of economic loss. United States v. Capo, 817 F.2d 947, 951-52 (2d Cir. 1987) (solicitation of money from job applicants by persons having no decisionmaking authority in return for favorable influence with employment counselors was insufficient evidence of inducement by fear); but see United States v. Blanton, 793 F.2d 1553, 1558 (11th Cir. 1986) (inducement by fear was proven by the defendant's solicitation of a labor consulting contract, to help employer stop outside union organizing, when the solicitation was accompanied by defendant's threat to form another union and begin organizing employees if the consulting contract was not accepted).

  3. Did the defendant's conduct actually or potentially obstruct, delay, or affect interstate or foreign commerce in any (realistic) way or degree?

    The Hobbs Act regulates extortion and robbery, which Congress has determined have a substantial effect on interstate and foreign commerce by reason of their repetition and aggregate effect on the economy. Therefore, the proscribed offenses fall within the category of crimes based on the Commerce Clause whose "de minimis character of individual instances arising under [the] statute is of no consequence." United States v. Bolton, 68 F.3d 396, 399 (10th Cir. 1995) (upholding Hobbs Act convictions for robberies whose proceeds the defendant would have used to purchase products in interstate commerce), quoting, United States v. Lopez, --- U.S. ---, 115 S.Ct. 1624, 1630 (1995); material in brackets added; see also United States v. Atcheson, 94 F.3d 1237, 1243 (9th Cir. 1996) (robbery of out-of-state credit and ATM cards); United States v. Farmer, 73 F.3d 836, 843 (8th Cir. 1996) (robbery of commercial business); United States v. Stillo, 57 F.3d 553, 558 n.2 (7th Cir. 1995).

    Hobbs Act violations may be supported by proof of a direct effect on the channels or instrumentalities of interstate or foreign commerce, as for example, where the threatened conduct would result in the interruption of the interstate movement of goods or labor. See United States v. Taylor, 92 F.3d 1313, 1333 (2d Cir. 1996) (extortion of money, unwanted labor, and subcontracts on construction projects by threatened shutdowns and labor unrest); United States v. Hanigan, 681 F.2d 1127, 1130-31 (9th Cir. 1982) (robbery of three undocumented alien farm workers while they were traveling from Mexico to the United States in search of work); United States v. Capo, 791 F.2d 1054, 1067-68 (2d Cir. 1986), vacated on other grounds, 817 F.2d 947 (2d Cir. 1987) (scheme to extort local job applicants had a potential effect on interstate applicants who might otherwise be hired).

    Indirect effects on such commerce are also sufficient, as for example, where the obtaining of property and resulting depletion of the victim's assets decreases the victim's ability to make future expenditures for items in interstate commerce.

    Taylor, supra (depletion of contractors' assets). However, the Seventh Circuit has distinguished Hobbs Act cases involving depletion of a business' assets from those involving the depletion of an individual employee's assets which, the court has ruled, are not as likely to satisfy the jurisdictional requirement of the Hobbs Act. United States v. Mattson, 671 F.2d 1020 (7th Cir. 1982); United States v. Boulahanis, 677 F.2d 586, 590 (7th Cir. 1982). Other circuits have agreed where the extortion or robbery of an individual has only an "attenuated" or "speculative" effect on some entity or group of individuals engaged in interstate commerce thereby diminishing the "realistic probability" that such commerce will be affected. See United States v. Collins, 40 F.3d 95, 100 (5th Cir. 1994) (conviction for robbery of a computer company employee reversed on grounds that theft of victim's automobile with cellular phone had an insufficient effect on his employer's business); United States v. Quigley, 53 F.3d 909 (8th Cir. 1995) (upholding the acquittal, following guilty verdict, of defendants who beat and robbed two individuals in route to buy beer at a liquor store).

  4. Was the defendant's actual or threatened use of force, violence or fear wrongful?

    Generally, the extortionate obtaining of property by the wrongful use of actual or threatened force or violence in a commercial dispute requires proof of a defendant's intent to induce the victim to give up property. No additional proof is required that the defendant was not entitled to such property or that he knew he had no claim to the property which he sought to obtain. See United States v. Agnes, 581 F.Supp. 462 (E.D. Pa. 1984), aff'd, 753 F.2d 293, 297-300 (3d Cir. 1985) (rejecting claim of right defense to defendant's use of violence to withdraw property from a business partnership).

    However, the Supreme Court has recognized a claim-of-right defense to Hobbs Act extortion in labor-management disputes.

    In a 1973 decision, the Court reversed the conviction of union-member defendants who had used violence against an employer's property, during an otherwise legitimate economic labor strike, in order "to achieve legitimate union objectives, such as higher wages in return for genuine services which the employer seeks." United States v. Enmons, 410 U.S. 396, 400 (1973). The Court reasoned that the legislative history of the Hobbs Act disclosed that Congress had been concerned with attempts by union officials to extort wages for unwanted and fictitious labor, to which employees were not entitled, as contrasted with the policing of legitimate labor strikes in general. Therefore, the Court concluded that the union members' use of violence during the strike was not "wrongful" for purposes of Hobbs Act extortion. The Supreme Court also made a broadly worded statement that

    "wrongful" has meaning in the Act only if it limits the statute's coverage to those instances where the obtaining of the property would itself be "wrongful" because the alleged extortionist has no lawful claim to that property.

Id.

In its labor-management context, the claim-of-right defense is not applicable where defendants do not have legitimate labor objectives. The labor claim-of-right defense has been held not to excuse the following kinds of coercive demands:

  • payoffs to union officials and employee representatives in violation of the federal labor laws (29 U.S.C. § 186); United States v. Quinn, 514 F.2d 1250, 1259 (5th Cir. 1975) (solicitation of church donation in return for removal of labor pickets); United States v. Gibson, 726 F.2d 869 (1st Cir. 1984) (request for payoff to remove pickets);
  • sham fees which labor unions are not entitled to collect under the labor laws; United States v. Wilford, 710 F.2d 439, 444 (8th Cir. 1983) (economic coercion of dues and initiation fees from truck drivers who were self-employed or who were told they would receive no member benefits);
  • employee payments which violate existing labor contracts; United States v. Russo, 708 F.2d 209, 215 (6th Cir. 1983) (under threat of job loss, employees' payment of health and pension contributions which labor contract required employer to pay);
  • employer payments to labor unions which are not included in existing labor contracts; United States v. Traitz, 871 F.2d 368, 381-82 (3d Cir. 1989) (violence used to collect fines on employers for non-compliance with union rules which were not made part of the labor contract);
  • demands that a non-union employer cease business operations during a sham union organizing campaign; United States v. Edgar Jones, 766 F.2d 994, 1002-03 (6th Cir. 1985) (violent campaign by union officials and union-represented competitor to drive the non-union employer out of business under the pretext of persuading employees to join the union and enforce area wage standards);
  • employer payments for labor consulting to establish a bogus "sweetheart union" and thereby discourage legitimate organizing by other unions; United States v. Blanton, 793 F.2d 1553 (11th Cir. 1986).
  • construction contractors' payments of money, wages for unwanted and superfluous employees, and subcontracts with employee representatives which were unrelated to the hiring of employees. United States v. Taylor, 92 F.3d 1313, 1319 and 1333 (2d Cir. 1996) (extortion of contractors by leaders of minority labor coalitions).

Several courts of appeals have limited the claim-of-right defense to the context of labor-management disputes by refusing to extend the defense to extortionate violence and economic fear in commercial disputes and public corruption cases. United States v. Debs, 949 F.2d 199, 201 (6th Cir. 1991) (violence against union members in retaliation for support of opposition candidate for union office); United States v. Castor, 937 F.2d 293, 299 (7th Cir. 1991) (violent threats to obtain consent to enter into business arrangement); United States v. Zappola, 677 F.2d 264, 269 (2d Cir. 1982) (beating of debtor to coerce repayment of purported debt); United States v. Porcaro, 648 F.2d 753, 760 (1st Cir. 1981) (franchisor's violence to compel franchisee to vacate premises); United States v. French, 628 F.2d 1069, 1075 (8th Cir.1980) (public official's kickbacks on bail bond settlements); United States v. Cerilli, 603 F.2d 415, 419 (3d Cir. 1979) (solicitation of political contributions); United States v. Warledo, 557 F.2d 721, 729-730 (10th Cir. 1977) (violence by Native Americans to compel railroad to pay reparations for tribal lands).

However, other courts have held that the extortionate use of fear of economic harm in commercial disputes is subject to a claim-of-right defense on the grounds that, unlike violence, the use of economic fear is not inherently "wrongful." See United States v. Kattar, 840 F.2d 118, 123-24 (1st Cir. 1988) (threat to expose church to litigation unless purported "award" for information was paid to defendant was not a legitimate use of economic fear where the information was false and defamatory); United States v. Clemente, 640 F.2d 1069, 1077-78 (2d Cir. 1981) (extortion of bogus consulting payments from subcontractor coerced by the threat of labor unrest against the subcontractor's principal).

Where the claim-of-right defense applies, courts have generally held that the Government must prove that the defendant knew that he was not entitled to receive the property which he sought to obtain. United States v. Arambasich, 597 F.2d 609, 611 (7th Cir. 1979) (demand by labor union official on employer that the official and others be hired for no-show employment using threat of labor unrest); United States v. Sturm, 870 F.2d 769, 774 (1st Cir. 1989) (in prosecution involving debtor's withholding of property from a creditor-bank, "the term 'wrongful' requires the government to prove, in cases involving extortion based on economic fear, that the defendant knew that he was not legally entitled to the property that he received."); United States v. Dischner, 974 F.2d 1502, 1515 (9th Cir. 1992) (failure to instruct that defendant must know he had no entitlement to property he sought by use of economic fear did not rise to the level of plain error; but "knowledge of the extortion encompasses knowledge of the lack of lawful claim to the property.").

2404 Hobbs Act -- Under Color of Official Right

In addition to the "wrongful use of actual or threatened force, violence, or fear," the Hobbs Act (18 U.S.C. § 1951) defines extortion in terms of "the obtaining of property from another, with his consent . . . under color of official right." In fact, the under color of official right aspect of the Hobbs Act derives from the common law meaning of extortion. As the Supreme Court explained in a recent opinion regarding the Hobbs Act,

"[a]t common law, extortion was an offense committed by a public official who took 'by color of his office' money that was not due to him for the performance of his official duties. . . . Extortion by the public official was the rough equivalent of what we would now describe as 'taking a bribe.'" Evans v. United States, 504 U.S. 255 (1992).

In order to show a violation of the Hobbs Act under this provision, the Supreme Court recently held that "the Government need only show that a public official has obtained a payment to which he was not entitled, knowing that the payment was made in return for official acts." While the definition of extortion under the Hobbs Act with regard to force, violence or fear requires the obtaining of property from another with his consent induced by these means, the under color of official right provision does not require that the public official take steps to induce the extortionate payment: It can be said that "the coercive element is provided by the public office itself." Evans v. United States, 504 U.S. 255 (1992); see United States v. Margiotta, 688 F.2d 108, 130 (2d Cir. 1982), cert. denied, 461 U.S. 913 (1983) ("[t]he public officer's misuse of his office supplies the necessary element of coercion . . . .").

This theory of extortion under color of official right has resulted in the successful prosecution of a wide range of officials, including those serving on the federal, state and local levels. For example: United States v. O'Connor, 910 F.2d 1266 (7th Cir. 1990), cert. denied, 111 S. Ct. 953 (1991) (police officer accepts payments from FBI agents posing as crooked auto parts dealers); United States v. Stephenson, 895 F.2d 867 (2d Cir. 1990) (international trade official in Department of Commerce accepts payments to influence ruling); United States v. Spitler, 800 F.2d 1267 (4th Cir. 1986) (state highway administrator accepts money from road building contractor); United States v. Wright, 797 F.2d 245 (5th Cir. 1986), cert. denied, 481 U.S. 1013 (1987) (city prosecutors accept money for not prosecuting drunk drivers); United States v. Greenough, 782 F.2d 1556 (11th Cir. 1986) (city commissioner accepts money for awarding city concession); United States v. Murphy, 768 F.2d 1518 (7th Cir. 1985), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1012 (1986) (judges accept payments to fix cases); United States v. Mazzei, 521 F.2d 639 (3d Cir.) (en banc), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 1014 (1975) (state senator accepts money from landlord seeking government office lease). In United States v. Stephenson, 895 F.2d at 871-73, the defendant, who was a federal official, unsuccessfully contended that the Hobbs Act only applied to state and local officials and that prosecution of federal official for extortion would have to be exclusively brought under 18 U.S.C. ��: extortion by officers and employees of the United States. The court found that the government could seek a charge under whichever of these two overlapping statutes it thought appropriate. Moreover, "it is not a defense to a charge of extortion under color of official right that the defendant could also have been convicted of bribery." Evans v. United States, 504 U.S. 255 (1992).

GENERAL RULE: The usual fact situation for a Hobbs Act charge under color of official right is a public official trading his/her official actions in a area in which he/she has actual authority in exchange for the payment of money.

Some cases under certain fact situations, however, have extended the statute further. For example:

  • Some courts have held that a Hobbs Act violation does not require that the public official have de jure power to perform any official act paid for as long as it was reasonable to believe that he/she had the de facto power to perform the requested act. See United States v. Nedza, 880 F.2d 896, 902 (7th Cir. 1989) (victim reasonably believed state senator had the ability to impact a local business); United States v. Bibby, 752 F.2d 1116, 1127-28 (6th Cir. 1985); United States v. Sorrow, 732 F.2d 176, 180 (11th Cir. 1984); United States v. Rindone, 631 F.2d 491, 495 (7th Cir. 1980) (public official can extort money for permit beyond control of his office, so long as victim has a reasonable belief that he could affect issuance); United States v. Rabbitt, 583 F.2d 1014 (8th Cir. 1978), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 1116 (1979); United States v. Harding, 563 F.2d 299 (6th Cir. 1977), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 1062 (1978); United States v. Brown, 540 F.2d 364 (8th Cir. 1976); United States v. Hall, 536 F.2d 313 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 919 (1976); United States v. Hathaway, 534 F.2d 386 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 819 (1976); United States v. Mazzei, 521 F.2d 639, 643 (3rd Cir.) (en banc), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 1014 (1975); United States v. Price, 507 F.2d 1349 (4th Cir. 1974).
  • Most courts have held that a Hobbs Act violation does not require that the public official be the recipient of the benefit of the extortion, and that a Hobbs Act case exists where the corpus of the corrupt payment went to a third party. However, consistent with the federal offenses of bribery and gratuities under 18 U.S.C. § 201 (see 9 U.S.A.M. §§ 85.101 through 85.105), where the corpus of the corrupt payment inures to the benefit of a person or entity other than the public official most courts have also required proof of a quid pro quo understanding between the private corrupter and the public official. See United States v. Haimowitz, 725 F.2d 1561, 1577 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 1072 (1984) ("a Hobbs Act prosecution is not defeated simply because the extorter transmitted the extorted money to a third party."); United States v. Margiotta, 688 F.2d 108 (2d Cir. 1982), cert. denied, 461 U.S. 913 (1983) (insurance agency made kickbacks to brokers selected by political leader of town); United States v. Scacchetti, 668 F.2d 643 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 457 U.S. 1132 (1982); United States v. Forszt, 655 F.2d 101 (7th Cir. 1981); United States v. Cerilli, 603 F.2d 415 (3rd Cir. 1979), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 1043 (1980); United States v. Trotta, 525 F.2d 1096 (2d Cir. 1975), cert. denied, 425 U.S. 971 (1976); United States v. Brennan, 629 F.Supp. 283 (E.D.N.Y.), aff'd, 798 F.2d 581 (2d Cir. 1986). But see McCormick v. United States, 500 U.S. 257 (1991)(allegedly corrupt payment made in the form of a campaign contribution to a third party campaign organization was insufficient to support a Hobbs Act conviction absent evidence of a quid pro quo).
  • Some courts have held that the Hobbs Act can be applied to past or future public officials, as well as to ones who presently occupy a public office at the time the corrupt payment occurs. See United States v. Meyers, 529 F.2d 1033, 1035-38 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 894 (1976) (court answered affirmatively the question "whether, within the meaning of the Hobbs Act, it is a crime for candidates for political office to conspire to affect commerce by extortion induced under color of official right during a time frame beginning before the election but not ending until after the candidates have obtained public office."); United States v. Lena, 497 F.Supp. 1352, 1359 (W.D. Pa. 1980), aff'd mem., 649 F.2d 861 (3rd Cir. (1981); United States v. Barna, 442 F.Supp. 1232, 1235 (M.D.Pa. 1978), aff'd mem., 578 F.2d 1376 (3rd Cir.), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 862 (1978).
  • Some courts have held that private persons who are not themselves public officials can be convicted under this provision if they caused public officials to perform official acts in return for payments to the non-public official. United States v. Margiotta, 688 F.2d 108 (2d Cir. 1982), cert. denied, 461 U.S. 913 (1983) (court upheld conviction of head of local Republican Party under color of official right where defendant could be said to have caused, under 18 U.S.C. ڈ(b), public officials to induce a third party to pay out money); see United States v. Haimowitz, 725 F.2d 1561, 1572-73 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 1072 (1984) (private attorney's conviction of Hobbs Act violation upheld due to complicity with state senator); United States v. Marcy, 777 F.Supp. 1398, 1399-400 (N.D.Ill. 1991); United States v. Barna, 442 F.Supp. 1232 (M.D. Pa.), aff'd mem., 578 F.2d 1376 (3rd Cir.), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 862 (1978). But see United States v. McClain, 934 F.2d 822, 829-32 (7th Cir. 1991) ("we believe that, as a general matter and with caveats as suggested here, proceeding against private citizens on an 'official rights' theory is inappropriate under the literal and historical meanings of the Hobbs Act, irrespective of the actual 'control' that citizen purports to maintain over governmental activity.").
  • Some courts have also held that private individuals who make payments to a public official can be charged under the Hobbs Act, either as an aider and abettor or co-conspirator, if he or she is truly the instigator of the transaction. See United States v. Torcasio, 959 F.2d 503, 505-06 (4th Cir. 1992); United States v. Spitler, 800 F.2d 1267, 1276-79 (4th Cir. 1986) (conviction affirmed for aiding and abetting extortion under color of official right even though defendant, who paid kickbacks from corporate coffers, was an officer of the victim corporation); United States v. Wright, 797 F.2d 245 (5th Cir. 1986). But see United States v. Tillem, 906 F.2d 814, 823-24 (2d Cir 1990) (consultant employed to help restaurants obtain approvals from corrupt health inspectors had no stake in the conspiracy and was not promoting the outcome).
  • Finally, in a federal prosecution of a state legislator, there is no legislative privilege barring the introduction at trial of evidence of the defendant's legislative acts. The Supreme Court has held that in such a prosecution a speech or debate type privilege for state legislators cannot be made applicable through Fed.R.Evid. 501. The Court said such privilege is not required by separation of powers considerations or by principles of comity, the two rationales underlying the Speech or Debate Clause of the U.S. Constitution, art. I, ڌ, cl. 1. United States v. Gillock, 445 U.S. 360, 368-74 (1980).

CAVEAT: The Hobbs Act and Campaign Contributions. The Supreme Court has held that, when an allegedly corrupt payment masquerades as a campaign contribution, and when there is no evidence that the corpus of the "contribution" inured to the personal benefit of the public officer in question or was a product of force or duress, the Hobbs Act requires proof of a quid pro quo agreement between the contributor and the public officer. McCormick v. United States, 500 U.S. 257 (1991). However, the Court has also held that proof that a quid pro quo agreement existed in a corruption case brought under the Hobbs Act may be proven circumstantially. Evans v. United States, 504 U.S. 255 (1992). This interpretation of the dimensions of the hobbs Act in corruption scenarios is consistent with the parameters of the facts needed to prove the federal crimes of bribery and gratuities under 18 U.S.C. § 201. See United States v. Brewster, 50-6 F.2d 62 (D.C. Cir. 1972), 9 U.S.A.M. §§ 85.101 through 85.105, supra.

CAVEAT: The Hobbs Act and evidence of a quid pro quo. When the Hobbs Act is applied to public corruption scenarios that lack evidence of actual "extortionate" duress, some courts have interpreted the Hobbs Act very strictly to require proof of a quid pro quo relationship between the private and the public parties to the transaction, even where the corpus of the payment inured to the personal benefit of the public official. See United States v. Martinez, 14 F.3d. 543 (11th Cir. 1994)(Hobbs Act did not apply to pattern of in-kind payments given personally to Florida mayor in the absence of evidence of a quid pro quo relationship between the mayor and alleged private corrupter); United States v. Taylor, 993 F.2d 382 (4th Cir. 1993)(same); United States v. Montoya, 945 F.2d 1086 (9th Cir. 1991)(same); contra United States v. Brandford, 33 F.3d 685 (6th Cir. 1994)(Hobbs Act does not require proof of quid pro quo where corpus of corrupt payment inured to the personal benefit of public officer). In addition, some courts require that corruption cases brought under the "color of official right" clause of the Hobbs Act be accompanied by proof that the public official induced the payment. See Montoya, supra.

At the very least, the courts will probably not extend the "color of official right" clause of the Hobbs Act beyond the parameters of crimes of bribery and gratuities in relation to federal officials that are described in 18 U.S.C. § 201. See United States v. Brewster, 506 F.2d 62 (D.C. Cir. 1974), 9 U.S.A.M. §§ 85.101 through 85.105, supra. This means that where the corpus of the alleged corrupt payment passed to someone or something other than the public official personally (including those where it passed to a political committee), the Hobbs Act probably does not apply unless there is also evidence of a quid pro quo. And even then, some Circuits, such as the Ninth, require additional proof that the payment was induced by the public official.

PRACTICE TIP: The Public Integrity Section possesses considerable expertise in using the Hobbs Act to prosecute public corruption. While not required, AUSAs are strongly urged to consult with the Public Integrity Section in the investigation and prosecution of corruption cases under this statutory theory. Public Integrity can be reached at 202-514-1412, or by fax at 202-514-3003.


FAAA Act Permits State Law to Regulate NonCon Towing Prices

Findlaw.com

U.S. Code as of: 01/02/01

Section 14501. Federal authority over intrastate transportation

(a) Motor Carriers of Passengers. -

(1) Limitation on state law. - No State or political subdivision thereof and no interstate agency or other political agency of 2 or more States shall enact or enforce any law, rule, regulation, standard, or other provision having the force and effect of law relating to -

(A) scheduling of interstate or intrastate transportation (including discontinuance or reduction in the level of service) provided by a motor carrier of passengers subject to jurisdiction under subchapter I of chapter 135 of this title on an interstate route;

(B) the implementation of any change in the rates for such transportation or for any charter transportation except to the extent that notice, not in excess of 30 days, of changes in schedules may be required; or

(C) the authority to provide intrastate or interstate charter bus transportation.

This paragraph shall not apply to intrastate commuter bus operations, or to intrastate bus transportation of any nature in the State of Hawaii.

(2) Matters not covered. - Paragraph (1) shall not restrict the safety regulatory authority of a State with respect to motor vehicles, the authority of a State to impose highway route controls or limitations based on the size or weight of the motor vehicle, or the authority of a State to regulate carriers with regard to minimum amounts of financial responsibility relating to insurance requirements and self-insurance authorization.

(b) Freight Forwarders and Brokers. -

(1) General rule. - Subject to paragraph (2) of this subsection, no State or political subdivision thereof and no intrastate agency or other political agency of 2 or more States shall enact or enforce any law, rule, regulation, standard, or other provision having the force and effect of law relating to intrastate rates, intrastate routes, or intrastate services of any freight forwarder or broker.

(2) Continuation of hawaii's authority. - Nothing in this subsection and the amendments made by the Surface Freight Forwarder Deregulation Act of 1986 shall be construed to affect the authority of the State of Hawaii to continue to regulate a motor carrier operating within the State of Hawaii.

(c) Motor Carriers of Property. -

(1) General rule. - Except as provided in paragraphs (2) and (3), a State, political subdivision of a State, or political authority of 2 or more States may not enact or enforce a law, regulation, or other provision having the force and effect of law related to a price, route, or service of any motor carrier (other than a carrier affiliated with a direct air carrier covered by section 41713(b)(4)) or any motor private carrier, broker, or freight forwarder with respect to the transportation of property.

(2) Matters not covered. - Paragraph (1) -

(A) shall not restrict the safety regulatory authority of a State with respect to motor vehicles, the authority of a State to impose highway route controls or limitations based on the size or weight of the motor vehicle or the hazardous nature of the cargo, or the authority of a State to regulate motor carriers with regard to minimum amounts of financial responsibility relating to insurance requirements and self-insurance authorization;

(B) does not apply to the transportation of household goods; and

(C) does not apply to the authority of a State or a political subdivision of a State to enact or enforce a law, regulation, or other provision relating to the price of for-hire motor vehicle transportation by a tow truck, if such transportation is performed without the prior consent or authorization of the owner or operator of the motor vehicle.

(3) State standard transportation practices. -

(A) Continuation. - Paragraph (1) shall not affect any authority of a State, political subdivision of a State, or political authority of 2 or more States to enact or enforce a law, regulation, or other provision, with respect to the intrastate transportation of property by motor carriers, related to -

(i) uniform cargo liability rules,

(ii) uniform bills of lading or receipts for property being transported,

(iii) uniform cargo credit rules,

(iv) antitrust immunity for joint line rates or routes, classifications, mileage guides, and pooling, or

(v) antitrust immunity for agent-van line operations (as set forth in section 13907), if such law, regulation, or provision meets the requirements of subparagraph (B).

(B) Requirements. - A law, regulation, or provision of a State, political subdivision, or political authority meets the requirements of this subparagraph if -

(i) the law, regulation, or provision covers the same subject matter as, and compliance with such law, regulation, or provision is no more burdensome than compliance with, a provision of this part or a regulation issued by the Secretary or the Board under this part; and

(ii) the law, regulation, or provision only applies to a carrier upon request of such carrier.

(C) Election. - Notwithstanding any other provision of law, a carrier affiliated with a direct air carrier through common controlling ownership may elect to be subject to a law, regulation, or provision of a State, political subdivision, or political authority under this paragraph.

(4) Nonapplicability to hawaii. - This subsection shall not apply with respect to the State of Hawaii.

News cache copyright free for nonprofit investigative use per 17 USC §107.


Info: Towing complaints

April 19, 2004

Who: City Wrecker Services Commission

What: Public hearings for citizens to voice complaints and safety concerns against local towing companies

When: 5:30 p.m. Tuesday [before weekly City Council meeting at 7pm]

Where: City County Building downtown, Small Assembly Room

The Soviet:
A Diverse Group Dialoging to Consensus
Over a Social Issue In a Facilitated Meeting
To a Predetermined Outcome

—Phillip Worts, Detective, San Diego Police Department, "How Communist Strategies Are Used To Control Americans - Communist Oriented Policing", Rense.com, 2-7-3

Republicrats and Demopublicans be damned to Skull & Bones HELL! They and the Libertarian Party love NAFTA, WTO and 50-million drug-running criminal alien invaders. Vote for the Constitution Party, before it's too late! Why do the Russian Khazar "Jews" (Bush, Kerry, ADL.ORG) hate the Constitution and eat off Hitler's silverware under a NAZI Swatika at Yale with Victor Ashe, and libel members of the Constitution Party as "Domestic Terrorists", when Khazar "Jews" founded Communism, and Jewish historians on C-SPAN and History Channel identify Adolf "Hitler" Shicklegruber as a Jew?


The dangers of Communist Oriented Policing (COPS)

Phillip Worts, Detective
San Diego Police Department

Dialectical Materialism - A philosophy founded by Karl Marx? which forms the basis of Communist doctrine: it combines the materialistic idea of matter over mind with the Hegelian dialectic in which opposing forces are constantly being reunited at a higher level."
—Lexicon Webster Dictionary

But that definition might beg the question, "What is the Hegelian dialectic?" For modern man, the answer to that question is epic. The Hegelian dialectic has profoundly impacted the world in which you live. Georg W.F. Hegel, the nineteenth century German philosopher, turned that concept upside down by equalizing Thesis and Antithesis. All things are now relative. There is no such thing as absolute truth to be found anywhere. Instead, "truth" is found in Synthesis, a compromise of Thesis and Antithesis. This is the heart and soul of the consensus process. At about the same time that Hegel was passing from the scene, Karl Marx caught the revolutionary fever. He drew heavily from Hegel (the dialectic) and Feuerbach (materialism). Around the turn of the century there was a growing trend within this movement that a better way to change the world is not abruptly and violently at the point of a bayonet, (traditional Marxist revolution), but rather it should be done slowly and incrementally by transforming individuals and their cultural institutions. Then you can control a country as effectively as if you conquered it militarily. In fact, this method is preferred because one does not have to rebuild bombed out cities and dig all those mass graves! The home for this new wave of dialectical Marxist thinking became the emerging "science" of socio-psychology. Meanwhile, in Germany, a group of some 21 Marxist socio-psychologists gathered in Frankfurt and formed the Institute of Marxist Research. Perhaps that was a little too obvious for their opponents and they renamed it the Institute for Social Research. When Hitler rose to power, most of these men fled to America and continued their work here. At the risk of oversimplifying how the process of group dynamics works, it could be summarized as a method of belief and behavior modification, using dialectic-reasoning skills (remember, all truth is relative), in a group setting. It utilizes the inherent fear an individual person has of being alienated from the group. By use of a change agent, or "facilitator", individuals are herded toward "consensus" by compromising their position for the sake of "social harmony." This is precisely the technique with which the communists brainwashed American POWs, the only difference being they could accelerate the "unfreezing" phase with physical torture. In group dynamics the pain is not physical, it's emotional. Do not underestimate the force of emotional pain. POWs frequently described their long periods in isolation as worse than some of the most brutal physical torture. Isolation from the group is a powerful behavior modification weapon. Transformational Marxists such as Kurt Lewin refined their weapon for the new battlefield: Using group dynamics to invade the culture to affect the paradigm shift. The weapon looks like this:

  • A Diverse Group ("Diversity" needed for conflict [drivers vs. cops])
  • Dialoging to Consensus (Dialectic process [Disinfo Babes and Talking Heads])
  • Over a Social Issue (Problem/Crisis/Issues [Driving/Travel = Crime])
  • In a Facilitated Meeting (Controlled environment using facilitator/change agent [Poly Ticks and Traffic Court = predecided outcome])
  • To a Predetermined Outcome (Paradigm shift ["Voluntary" Contracts = Tax Revenue])

With this background we arrive at our current application of the dialectic in our nation. I would like to now focus on the role that your local law enforcement agency has in the "re-culturing of America." Your local beat cop has a special part to play, and he doesn't even realize it. Not only has Total Quality Management (TQM) change agents restructured many of the police departments in America, they are now in a position to turn the police themselves into the facilitators of the community through a program called COPs, or Community Oriented Policing. COPs is a federally funded program administered through the U.S. Department of Justice. What is COPs? The most succinct definition I found was in a DJ brochure:

COMMUNITY POLICING WHAT IS IT? Shift in philosophy about police duties vs. community responsibilities to a team concept of TOTAL QUALITY MANAGEMENT of the community. Reidentifying the police role as a FACILITATOR in the community." (Emphasis mine).

Translation: Transformation from a constitutionally empowered local police force performing their duty to keep the peace to that of a change agent working within the community to affect a Marxist paradigm shift. Formerly, the police administrators were accountable to the elected officials who were accountable to the voters (representative democracy). This new paradigm that Trojanowicz describes is exactly what Marxist George Lukacs termed "participatory democracy" and is nothing more than the Soviet style council. The United States Constitution was the law of the land (absolute authority) restraining government intrusion into the rights of the individual. The framers designed it to insulate the private realm (the individual) from the public realm (government). Allow me to repeat Lukacs:

"The institutions in socialist society which act as the facilitators between the public and private realms are the Soviets."

By practicing the dialectic, we are removing the only barrier between a tyrannical government and the private citizen. Your neighborhood cop is now that facilitator, the Soviet. Why a police officer?

In the role of the community ombudsman/liaison (i.e. facilitator), the community policing officer also acts as the community's link to other public agencies. The police are the only governmental agency open 24 hours a day, which makes them the ideal public agent to begin regenerating community spirit." (Trojanowicz, The meaning of "Community" in Community Policing, p4)

When Lenin was consolidating the Bolshevik revolution, he wrote how he would implement the communist bureaucracy without hardcore Marxist believers. While the elite rulers of his inner circle understood the structure he was building, Lenin said he would exploit the natural vanity and ambition of people to forward his agenda without them knowing what they were really doing. Eager to gain his favor and to enhance their political careers, they would fall all over themselves trying to promote his agenda. He called these types of people "Useful Idiots." Before you brand every police officer you see as an undercover Marxist, understand that most of them comprehend little of what they are participating in. In reality, most officers intuitively know that something is wrong in their organization, but they play the game rather than risk damaging their career. Sadly, they constitute a vast army of "useful idiots." The terms "communism", "socialism", "Marxism", "New World Order" etc., may be worn out and abandoned. The names change, because deception is one of the rules of the game. Many erroneously believe that the cold war is over and that we actually won. But the revolution is still very much alive and America is losing. The culture war is raging in our schools, our workplaces, our media and our churches. Antonio Gramsci would be very pleased if he could see just how effective his strategy has been.

"Confiscation of property of all emigrants and rebels."
Communist Manifesto, 4th Plank

"Government control of Communications and Transportation."
Communist Manifesto, 6th Plank

"Mr. Dodd, we operate here at the Ford Foundation under directives which emanate from the White House?We operate and control our grant-making policies?as follows: We shall use our grant-making power so as to alter life in the United States that it can be comfortably merged with the Soviet Union."
—Rowan Gaither, president of the Ford Foundation, reported by Professor Texe Marrs, PhD, USAF (retired), "AmeriRus", Power of Prophesy Radio News

"Hitler, Stalin, Mao: Mass murderers agree - gun control works!"
—T-Shirt, Infowars.com, WBCR 1470AM Alcoa, TN

"Violence does not and cannot exist by itself; it is invariably intertwined with the lie."
—Alexander Solzhenitsyn, acceptance speech for Nobel Prize

"You will be happy to learn that the former head of the KGB (the secret police of the former Soviet Union), General Yevgeni Primakov, has been hired as a consultant by the US Department of Homeland Security. Then there's General Karpov, former KGB station chief of their Washington station at their embassy and the first director of the Russian Federal Security Service. You could call this the 'Sovietization of America.' He cant get over how many ex-KGB generals and colonels still want to come over to the United States and become consultants to get on the pay corps. And Primakov is waiting for the USSA, The United Soviet States of America. It'll probably make him feel right at home."
—Al Martin, AlMartinRaw.com, Behind the Scenes in the Beltway, "Get Ready for the USSA (The United Soviet States of America)," March 17, 2003


Neoconned

Congressman Ron Paul, MD (R-TX), former Libertarian Party presidential candidate (1988)
Speech in the US House of Representatives
July 10, 2003

It's important that those of us who love liberty, and resent big-brother government, to identify the philosophic supporters who have the most to say about the direction our country is going. This depends on whether the American people desire to live in a free society and reject the dangerous notion that we need a strong central government to take care of us from the cradle to the grave. Those who scheme are proud of the achievements in usurping control over foreign policy. These are the 'Neoconservatives' of recent fame ["New Conservatives"]. But can freedom and the republic survive this takeover? Here is a brief summary of the general understanding of what Neocons believe:

  • They agree with Trotsky on permanent revolution, violent as well as intellectual.
  • They accept the notion that the ends justify the means?that hardball politics is a moral necessity.
  • They believe lying is necessary for the state to survive.
  • They believe a powerful federal government is a benefit.
  • They believe pertinent facts about how a society should be run should be held by the elite and withheld from those who do not have the courage to deal with it.
  • Force should not be limited to the defense of our country.

Not only did Leo Strauss write favorably of Machiavelli, Michael Ledeen, a current leader of the neoconservative movement, did the same in 1999 in his book with the title, Machiavelli on Modern Leadership, and subtitled: Why Machiavelli's iron rules are as timely and important today as five centuries ago. Ledeen specifically praises: 'Creative destruction? both within our own society and abroad.' If those words don't scare you, nothing will."

"The people resemble a wild beast, which, naturally fierce and accustomed to live in the woods, has been brought up, as it were, in a prison and in servitude, and having by accident got its liberty, not being accustomed to search for its food, and not knowing where to conceal itself, easily becomes the prey of the first who seeks to incarcerate it again."
—Niccolo Machiavelli (Secretary of War for City-state of Florence, Italy, and tortured in his own city as a POW), from The Prince

"And how we burned in the camps later, thinking: What would things have been like if every Security operative, when he went out at night to make an arrest, had been uncertain whether he would return alive and had to say good-bye to his family? Or if, during periods of mass arrests, as for example in Leningrad, when they arrested a quarter of the entire city, people had not simply sat there in their lairs, paling in terror at every bang of the downstairs door and at every step on the staircase, but had understood they had nothing left to lose and had boldly set up in the downstairs hall an ambush of half a dozen people with axes, hammers, pokers, or whatever else was at hand? The Organs would very quickly have suffered a shortage of officers and transport and, notwithstanding all of Stalin's thirst, the cursed machine would have ground to a halt!"
—Alexandr Solzhenitsyn, from The Gulag Archipelago, reposted: "Slaves in Their Own Fucking Country", Jerry Stratton, San Diego, California, June 22, 1997


Tow company lawyer helps make case for enforcing laws

Commissioners told many proposed suggestions already on state books

By HAYES HICKMAN, hickman@knews.com
Knoxville News-Sentinel
April 27, 2004

The city's Wrecker Services Commission members received arguably the best advice from the unlikeliest of sources as they met Monday to discuss potential new ordinances to cure many of the reported problems among local towing companies.

The board had several issues on the table as members debriefed from last week's public hearings, where citizens voiced complaints of suspicious practices and possibly illegal tows by some Knoxville wrecker companies.

Commission Chairman Mark Williamson proposed a slew of new regulations Monday aimed at industry oversight, including business licensing and equipment inspections.

"Part of it is our ability to offer a license to operate a tow truck and our ability to license individual drivers," Williamson explained.

That's when Michael McGovern, the attorney who has battled with the commission on behalf of several towing firms, reminded the members that such laws already exist at the state level.

"Why create another law that you're not going to enforce," McGovern asked.

And according to Williamson, if that's the case, then the existing laws may be the key to solving many of the industry's problems.

"If the laws are already on the books then great," he said. "But we still need to find the tools to enforce them."

For example, Assistant City Law Director Alyson Eberting said that state law requires tow truck operators to receive written authorization from property owners before a vehicle can be removed from a private lot.

But the law is rarely enforced, she said. Instead, wrecker companies often operate under written or verbal agreements with apartment complexes and private businesses, giving them "carte blanche" authority to patrol parking lots and tow any unauthorized vehicles, Eberting said.

The issue reminded commission members of allegations made during the recent public hearing from the mother of a University of Tennessee student. Carolyn Cole claimed drivers from Cedar Bluff 24-Hour Towing and Chestnut Street Garage confronted her daughter at a Fort Sanders apartment complex.

The drivers threatened to tow the student's vehicle unless she paid $95, Cole contended, and only later did she learn that the apartment management already had barred the two companies from the property.

More students, and members of the public at-large, should be made aware of their rights in such situations, Williamson said. And more effort should be made to ensure that tow truck drivers have the proper documentation, he added.

McGovern argued that the Fort Sanders incident was actually an authorized tow, and that the state law requiring authorization was unconstitutional anyway.

Williamson said: "Maybe we need to look into that more, and realize that this commission has subpoena power (to review documents and records.) Maybe we can have our own little test case."

The chairman also encouraged citizens to report any possible illegal tows to the Knoxville Police Department's Inspections Unit at 865-215-7217.

The wrecker commission is scheduled to meet again at 5 p.m., Tuesday, May 11.

Hayes Hickman may be reached at 865-342-6323.


Citizens tell wrecker panel about lies, intimidation

Pleas heard for stronger ordinances to control some

By HAYES HICKMAN, hickman@knews.com
Knoxville News-Sentinel
April 21, 2004

City Wrecker Services Commission members heard repeated claims Tuesday night of intimidation, lies and highway robbery by local towing companies when they opened the floor to citizens' complaints at a public hearing.

And regardless of the speaker, citizens, police officers and wrecker service owners alike ended their stories with pleas for stronger city ordinances to counter what they view as often-unethical business practices by some in the industry.

"I hope someone here will take notice today that Chestnut Street Garage and Cedar Bluff Towing lurk in the dark and prey on people," said Carolyn Cole, after relating an alleged incident involving her daughter and two tow truck drivers last month in a dark parking lot near the University of Tennessee campus. "I hope your decision will be to hold these people accountable."

Cole contended the drivers blocked her daughter's vehicle, and threatened to tow the college student's car from her own apartment complex unless she paid $95 on sight. Only later did she learn that the apartment owners already had barred the companies from the property after several similar complaints.

"They jeopardized her safety, held her hostage and robbed her," Cole said.

Officer Phil Major, with the Knoxville Police Department's Inspections Unit, said investigators are looking into "numerous complaints" of illegal towing from the same complex.

Randy Hinton, owner of Cedar Bluff 24-Hour Towing and Chestnut Street Garage, sat near the back of the room listening, but he did not speak to the commission.

Hinton's firms are two of the four companies that were barred last year from holding city contracts to answer police requests for service at accident scenes after allegations of overcharging.

Owners of some of the companies that now hold city contracts complained Tuesday that many of the blacklisted firms still arrive at wreck scenes to swipe business away.

Clark Purcell, owner of Clark's Towing, said he often responds to police requests under his city contract, only to arrive and find that another wrecker has beat him to the scene.

"If you've got other wreckers showing up at the scene, you're taking bread off our table," Purcell said, adding that he doesn't have the time or manpower to "go out and guard what I should be getting anyway."

"Make an ordinance and start hitting them in the pocketbook make it hurt."

John Carnes, with Clinton Highway Wrecker Service, holds a city contract covering the Fountain City area. He said the requests are often cancelled while his drivers are en route because of the solicitations.

"If it's within a five-mile radius of Fountain City Towing, I can bet we'll get cancelled," Carnes claimed.

Fountain City Wrecker Service owner Joel Smith, whose company was also barred from the city contracts, attended but did not address the commission.

Billy Mullins, owner of Sutherland Avenue Wrecker Service, the fourth firm barred by the city, also attended Tuesday's hearing but did not speak.

Ending the two-hour meeting, Commission Chairman Mark Williamson said the board would "move quickly" to propose new city ordinances, including possible fines and suspensions to address the problems.

"We need to not only be responsive to the issues we have now," he said. "We need to anticipate problems we could have in the future."

Hayes Hickman may be reached at 865-342-6323.


Wronged by wreckers? Bring beefs to meeting

Towing procedures may need legislative changes

By HAYES HICKMAN, hickman@knews.com
Knoxville News-Sentinel
April 19, 2004

If you've ever had a bad run-in with a local towing company, now's your chance to complain.

The city Wrecker Services Commission is inviting an airing of comments at a public hearing Tuesday evening in hopes of identifying any problems connected to Knoxville's wrecker service industry that might warrant legislative reforms.

Whether it's college students with complaints about possible price gouging after having their vehicles towed from a parking lot in Fort Sanders or accident victims who were solicited by competing tow truck drivers before police could arrive at the scene of a wreck, Commission Chairman Mark Williamson says he wants to hear "from anybody who feels like they've been wronged."

"There are a wide variety of issues that need to be looked at," he said. "It may be time to sit down and look at (drafting) a new towing ordinance."

While the commission is willing to hear all comers, Williamson added that the commission is primarily interested in problems that apply to safety concerns.

"Paramount to the whole thing is the issue of safety," he explained. "Police officers get killed every day at accident scenes. Tow truck drivers get killed every day at accident scenes. Pedestrians get killed everyday. Accident scenes are hectic as it is.

"When you have two or three tow trucks show up at a scene before the police get there that's a fatality waiting to happen."

At their March meeting, commission members heard similar allegations of at-the-scene solicitations from several tow truck operators who are contracted with the city to respond to accidents at police officers' request.

The contracted firms complained of interference from the same companies that lost their city contracts last year for alleged overcharging.

Any new legislation wouldn't be the first time the city of Knoxville has attempted to control the business practices of such companies. Attorneys for several local towing firms successfully defeated a city ordinance enacted in the 1990s to set price limits.

Since then, several court cases throughout the country have upheld state and local ordinances regarding solicitation, as well as those that banned the use of police radio scanners for safety reasons.

Williamson considers the trend to be a good indicator that the city may have the legal footing to go beyond its current regulations.

"As far as somebody who leaves their car in an impound lot and doesn't go to pick it up for a month who gets clocked with $700 . There's not a whole lot I can do there," he said. "But part of our job is to hear the concerns of the community and see if we can't respond legislatively."

Hayes Hickman may be reached at 865-342-6323.


Panel's report [allegedly] clears sheriff

No conflict of interest [allegedly] exists with wrecker operator, probe [allegedly] finds

By SCOTT BARKER AND LAURA AYO
barkers@knews.com ayol@knews.com
Knoxville News-Sentinel
April 10, 2004

Knox County Sheriff Tim Hutchison's relationship with a wrecker service operator doesn't violate conflict of interest laws, but ethics rules should be strengthened and expanded to cover all county officials, a panel concluded Friday.

The three-person panel noted an "obvious personal friendship and current association" between Hutchison and Randy Hinton, president of Chestnut Street Garage and Cedar Bluff Towing.

However, the panel said the sheriff would have to make money directly from his office's dealings with the companies for a conflict of interest to exist.

Chestnut Street Garage runs the Sheriff's Office seized-vehicle lot. Both of Hinton's companies also tow county-owned vehicles under a contract and private vehicles at the request of deputies.

Neither Hinton nor Sheriff's Office representatives returned phone messages Friday, but a posting on the Sheriff's Office Web site said Hutchison was pleased with the report.

"This states exactly what I have been saying all along - there is no conflict of interest and no business arrangement with Hinton," Hutchison wrote. "No other elected official in the state of Tennessee has had to divulge such personal affairs in a public document as I have had to do."

The panel's 20-page report is based on interviews with 14 people, including the sheriff and Hinton, as well as a review of publicly available documents. The report included copies of those documents as exhibits.

The panel did not obtain any other documentation supporting statements made by the people interviewed.

The panel recommended requiring more detailed conflict of interest disclosures from county officials and people seeking county business. Those disclosures would go beyond current practices by forcing officials and vendors to divulge relationships that could affect their business judgments, including associates, friends and relatives.

The county should adopt uniform conflict of interest policies that would apply to elected officials and employees, with enforceable penalties for violations, the report states.

"We recommend you have one across-the-board conflict of interest policy that everybody from this point on must abide by," said Knox County Purchasing Director Hugh Holt. "It's not a policy without teeth."

The panel also recommended implementation of an independent contractor conflict of interest policy and compliance statement, which would require county vendors to answer detailed questions about any possible conflicts.

"It's going to make them say, 'No, I don't have a relationship with the sheriff,' " Holt said. "There's going to be no doubt - if they say, 'No,' they've lied to us."

Knox County Mayor Mike Ragsdale, who appointed the panel last month after the News Sentinel published a story about Hutchison and Hinton's involvement in a Sevier County real estate development, will review the proposals with the intent to present them to the Knox County Commission for approval, spokesman Mike Cohen said.

"It is our intention to pursue the recommendations," Cohen said.

The panel consisted of Holt, County Commission internal auditor Richard Walls and private attorney David Eldridge.

"We all worked hard in an effort to be fair and thorough in our examination of the questions we were asked to consider," Eldridge said.

Ragsdale asked the panel to examine the agreement between the Sheriff's Office and Chestnut Street Garage, possible business relationships between the sheriff and Hinton, whether Sheriff's Office employees improperly worked outside their public duties and the use of the City County Building's address for private business purposes.

"I believe we achieved that goal," Eldridge said. "With regard to any further questions as to the details of how our panel did its job, I would respectfully refer your readers to the report."

The findings were based on state law and the Knox County Charter, which prohibit officials from making money on public contracts for which they're responsible. The panel did not consider whether the relationship violated the Knox County Procurement Manual, which has a broader definition of conflict of interest.

The procurement manual states that a conflict of interest exists when an employee has a "relationship with an outsider that is inherently unethical or that might be implied or construed to be or make possible personal gain because of the employee's partiality toward the outsider for personal reasons or otherwise inhibit the impartiality of the employee's business judgment."

Holt said the panel relied on state and county law because members questioned whether the procurement manual's provisions could be enforced on an independent, elected official like the sheriff.

Chestnut Street Garage has operated a vehicle seizure lot for the Sheriff's Office for $2,000 a month under an unwritten agreement since 1998, records show.

The sheriff told the panel former Finance Director Kathy Hamilton approved a lease in the mid-1990s to store seized vehicles at Chestnut Street Garage, but Hamilton told them she never reviewed or approved such an agreement. Neither the Sheriff's Office nor Chestnut Street Garage produced a written contract or other documentation of the sheriff's assertion.

The panel concluded the friendship between Hutchison and Hinton developed after the agreement was negotiated. They based that finding on statements from Hutchison and Hinton indicating their friendship began two to three years ago.

Records show Hutchison paid Hinton for political advertising in 1994, and Hinton contributed money to the sheriff's subsequent re-election bids.

The panel's investigation centered on Hutchison and Hinton's real estate investments in Sevier County beginning in 2001, when the sheriff bought a lot in a subdivision between Wears Valley and Pigeon Forge.

The probe did not reveal that Hutchison and Hinton ever had a common ownership interest in any business or real estate.

In 2002, Hutchison used a company called RMCH Developers LLC to buy 48 acres of adjacent land. Hutchison told the panel that RMCH Developers consisted of him and Johnnie Conner, a Karns businesswoman, though he produced no supporting documentation. The panel did not interview Conner.

RMCH Developers bought the land from Nickey Maxey, another associate of the sheriff who receives business from the Sheriff's Office, for $1.32 million, nearly five times the going rate for Wears Valley on a per acre basis. There is no trust deed on file in Sevier County indicating how the purchase was financed.

In February, the company deeded the land to Conner for an undisclosed amount.

Deeds show Hutchison, Hinton, Conner and Maxey now own separate parcels in the roughly 65 acres of land. They are the only property holders behind the gates of the secluded development.

Four houses have been built on the land. Since Sevier County doesn't issue building permits, the panel reviewed septic-tank permits in an attempt to determine who built the houses.

Despite acknowledging unanswered questions about the building activity in the development, the panel concluded the septic-tank permits didn't establish that Hutchison and Hinton owned property together.

The panel also determined that Sheriff's Office employees performed services concerning the personal business of the sheriff and Hinton.

In-house legal adviser Carleton Bryant, executive secretary Marianne Thompson and administrative secretary Mitzi Evans notarized deeds and other documents. The report indicates the sheriff paid them, often in cash, for the work.

"The panel acknowledges the practice of using a notary at a place of business, for personal reasons, is a common occurrence," the report states.

Bryant and another legal adviser, Mike Ruble, provided legal assistance. Both lawyers told the panel they did the work on their own time in a location away from the Sheriff's Office and Hutchison said he compensated them.

Neither the sheriff nor the employees provided the panel with billing or payment documentation.

The panel did not address the sheriff's role in building Hinton's South Knox County residence. Hutchison, a licensed general contractor, has said he helped build the house free of charge.

The report does indicate that one Sheriff's Office employee, Deputy Les Mullins, did some construction work at Hinton's lakeside home. Mullins told the panel he did the work on his own time and was compensated by Hinton.

The sheriff told the panel his use of the City County Building address on his private business documents was "inadvertent."

Knox County taxpayers paid Hinton companies $37,653 in fiscal year 2003 for towing and related services, including the seizure lot. Towing and storage fees charged to residents can amount to several hundred dollars per vehicle.

The seizure lot stores vehicles and other goods seized as evidence during investigations. Also, funds obtained through auctions of seized property supplement the Sheriff's Office budget.

Knoxville officials have banned Hinton's two wrecker companies and two other towing firms from doing business with the city for five years after the companies were accused of overcharging customers in violation of their municipal contracts.

The city sued Hinton's companies, along with Sutherland Avenue Wrecker Service, for filing falsified documents with regulators. The companies have denied any wrongdoing.

Knox County is the state's largest local government without its own seizure lot. Knoxville, Memphis, Chattanooga, Shelby County, Hamilton County and Metropolitan Nashville all operate their own facilities.

After the News Sentinel published an article about the unwritten, no-bid arrangement in Knox County, officials agreed to put the operation up for competition.

Chestnut Street Garage was the only firm to submit a proposal, at double the cost, and the Knox County Purchasing Department is reviewing the bid.

Scott Barker may be reached at 865-342-6309._ Laura Ayo may be reached at 865-342-6341.


Panel had questions about septic permits

By SCOTT BARKER AND LAURA AYO
barkers@knews.com ayol@knews.com
Knoxville News-Sentinel
April 10, 2004

A panel investigating whether a conflict of interest existed between Knox County Sheriff Tim Hutchison and wrecker-service operator Randy Hinton noted they didn't get satisfactory answers to all their questions.

One of the areas the panel examined to reach the conclusion that no conflict of interest existed was whether Hutchison and Hinton owned property together in a gated Sevier County development.

Records show Hinton's name and business address appear on a septic tank permit application signed by Hutchison for a building site on a lot now owned by the sheriff's wife, Jan Hutchison.

The sheriff told the panel the listing of Hinton as the owner was "a mistake and he attributed it to a clerical error." Hinton told the panel he wasn't even aware his name was on the permit.

"The fact that Sheriff Hutchison applied for a septic permit for a lot that he owns in Randy Hinton's name raises questions as to how and why this occurred that have not been satisfactorily explained," the report states.

Also not satisfactorily explained, the report states, is why a post office box address used by Hutchison for personal and campaign purposes appears as the address for a Hinton company on a deed.

The report states that Carleton Bryant, Knox County Sheriff's Office legal adviser, prepared the deed and told the panel he didn't know the post office box was associated with the sheriff.

Records also show a Hutchison company obtained a septic tank permit for property now owned by Hinton. The sheriff told the panel the listing of his company as the owner of the lot was another "mistake."

"He stated that he and Mr. Hinton were moving forward with plans to have a septic tank installed on their respective lots at the same time and that he may have sent in a check for both applications," the report states. Hinton also couldn't explain the matter.

The panel noted the error may have been made by the Sevier County Health Department staff, which did Hutchison a favor by allowing him to mail in information needed for the application. Department policy calls for applicants to appear in person.

Scott Barker may be reached at 865-342-6309. Laura Ayo may be reached at 865-342-6341.


Panel [allegedly] finds no conflict in sheriff probe, urges expanded ethics reporting

By SCOTT BARKER AND LAURA AYO
barkers@knews.com ayol@knews.com
Knoxville News-Sentinel
April 9, 2004

A panel investigating Sheriff Tim Hutchison's real estate deals ruled today that no conflict of interest exists between him and wrecker company executive Randy Hinton.

The panel did recommend expanding conflict of interest disclosures and streamlining ethical standards in order to keep employees and office holders above the appearance of wrongdoing.

"The panel's investigation supports the conclusion that there has been a close personal relationship between Sheriff Hutchison and Mr. Hinton for at least the last two to three years," the panel wrote.

"The panel's investigation does not establish that Sheriff Hutchison and Mr. Hinton have currently, or have ever had, common ownership of any business or real estate."

The panel based its findings on state law and the Knox County Charter. The panel apparently did not use the Knox County procurement manual, which has a broader definition of conflict of interest, in reaching its conclusion.

The panel interviewed Hutchison, Hinton and several other associates and county employees for its report.

Apparently, neither Hutchison nor his employees provided any documentation to supplement their interviews.

Knox County Mayor Mike Ragsdale's office released the report today.

The inquiry, done by a three-member panel, centered on Hutchison's relationship with Hinton, owner of Chestnut Street Garage and Cedar Bluff Towing.

Ragsdale appointed the panel after the News Sentinel published a story detailing Hutchison and Hinton's involvement in a gated Sevier County real-estate development.

Hutchison, Hinton and two other associates of the sheriff own the roughly 65 acres of property behind the gates.

Records show a Hutchison company obtained a septic-tank permit for property now owned by a Hinton company. Hinton also obtained a septic-tank permit for a lot now owned by Hutchison's wife, Jan.

Hutchison has said publicly that both his family and the Hintons own houses inside the Trace 200 subdivision.

Sheriff's Office employees performed some of the administrative tasks associated with acquiring the property, including the preparation of a deed for a Hinton company. Hutchison has said his employees did the work on their own time and were compensated for it.

Hutchison, a licensed general contractor, has repeatedly denied that he has personal business dealings with Hinton, though he has acknowledged that he helped build Hinton's lakefront home free of charge.

Records show Chestnut Street Garage has operated the Sheriff's Office seizure lot for $2,000 a month since 1998. County officials have been unable to find a contract governing the arrangement.

Both of Hinton's companies tow county-owned vehicles under a contract and private vehicles at the request of deputies. Hutchison has said he and Hinton, a longtime political contributor to the sheriff, are friends.

Knox County Finance Department officials persuaded Hutchison to put the seizure lot business up for competition after the News Sentinel published a story about the no-bid, unwritten arrangement.

The newspaper began looking into the county's towing business after city of Knoxville officials banned Hinton's towing firms and two others from municipal contracts.

City officials have accused the wrecker services of overcharging customers. The firms have denied any wrongdoing.

Scott Barker may be reached at 865-342-6309.

Laura Ayo may be reached at 865-342-6341.


Sheriff helped build house for tow boss

By SCOTT BARKER AND LAURA AYO
Knoxville News-Sentinel
March 18, 2004

Knox County Sheriff Tim Hutchison announced Thursday on the Sheriff's Office Web site that he helped build a lakefront house free of charge for the businessman who operates the Sheriff's Office seizure lot.

The posting came after News Sentinel reporters requested an interview regarding his role in building the Crab Orchard stone house in South Knox County for wrecker company executive Randy Hinton.

Earlier in the day, three construction inspectors in two county departments had told the newspaper they had met with Hutchison, a licensed general contractor, at the building site on separate occasions in 2002 and 2003. The inspections occurred during regular business hours on weekdays.

Whether Hinton, a longtime campaign contributor to Hutchison, and the sheriff have a relationship that violates county procurement policies is the focus of a conflict of interest probe initiated last week by Knox County Mayor Mike Ragsdale.

Hinton's Chestnut Street Garage operates the seizure lot for the Sheriff's Office under a no-bid, unwritten agreement. Hinton maintained he had no conflict of interest with any county official in a routine affidavit submitted to the Knox County Purchasing Department in late February.

Hutchison has maintained in recent public appearances that his relationship with Hinton does not constitute a conflict of interest .

"I don't have any personal business dealings with the Hintons," Hutchison said Sunday on WBIR Channel 10's "Inside Tennessee."

Thursday's posting on the department Web site states:

"As Sheriff Hutchison has repeatedly stated to responsible broadcast media, he and Hinton are personal friends. The Sheriff notes that Hinton sought his advice and input on a number of occasions while Hinton was building his house, and the Sheriff was 'more than happy to assist my friend. I've assisted many people in building their houses, and just like Randy, never sent them a bill.'"

As allowed by state law for property owners, Hinton obtained the permits for construction of the house at 3714 Maloney Rd. and listed himself as the contractor on a notice of completion filed with the Knox County Register of Deeds office. The house, which belongs to Kimberly and Randy Hinton, is valued at $227,300 for tax purposes.

Ragsdale has set no limits on what areas the three-person panel conducting the inquiry should explore. Roy Braden Jr., the county's chief building official, said Thursday he turned over documents regarding the Maloney Road house to the panel.

Braden said he talked to Hutchison about the house's construction during an inspection on July 30, 2003. They spoke, he said, for a few minutes during the nearly two-hour inspection.

"To me, Tim (Hutchison) was doing Randy Hinton a favor by helping him build his house," Braden said.

A Knox County Health Department inspector, however, left a site visit under the impression that Hutchison was the general contractor for the project.

Neil Hall, a septic system inspector, said he talked to Hutchison about the septic system installation during an April 15, 2003, inspection.

"I thought he was the contractor," Hall said. "I talked to him for a few minutes. I was under the impression he was building the house for a friend of his."

John Violette, another Health Department inspector, said he had met with Hutchison and Hinton at the building site seven months earlier.

Though he couldn't recall particulars of the conversation, Violette said he came away thinking that Hutchison was involved in the construction.

"Something must have happened in the conversation that led me to believe that ? he was involved in the house-building part of it," Violette said. "I don't know if he was helping a friend or lending his expertise or what."

Hinton did not return a phone message left at his office Thursday afternoon.

The Knox County procurement manual states that a conflict of interest exists when an employee has a "relationship with an outsider that is inherently unethical or that might be implied or construed to be or make possible personal gain because of the employee's partiality toward the outsider for personal reasons or otherwise inhibit the impartiality of the employee's business judgment."

Hinton receives $2,000 per month from the Sheriff's Office to run the county seizure lot at Chestnut Street Garage. Knox County officials have been unable to find a contract governing the arrangement, which records show has been in effect since 1998.

Both of Hinton's companies tow county-owned vehicles under a contract and private vehicles at the request of deputies. Towing and storage fees charged to citizens can amount to several hundred dollars for each vehicle.

Knox County Finance Department officials persuaded Hutchison to put the seizure lot business up for competition, and proposals from interested firms are due on Monday.

Also due on Monday is the report of the conflict of interest panel. Purchasing Director Hugh Holt, Knox County Commission Internal Auditor Richard Walls and private lawyer David Eldridge are conducting the probe.

If the panel rules there is a conflict of interest, Hinton could be banned from holding county contracts for a year.

Ragsdale named the panel after the News Sentinel published a story detailing Hutchison and Hinton's involvement in a gated Sevier County real estate development.

Hutchison, Hinton and two other associates of the sheriff own the roughly 65 acres of property behind the gates.

Records show a Hutchison company obtained a septic-tank permit for property now owned by a Hinton company. Hinton also obtained a septic-tank permit for a lot now owned by Hutchison's wife, Jan.

Hutchison has said publicly that both his family and the Hintons own houses inside the Trace 200 subdivision.

Sheriff's Office employees performed some of the administrative tasks associated with acquiring the property, including the preparation of a deed for a Hinton company.

Hutchison has said his employees did the work on their own time and were compensated for it.

Scott Barker may be reached at 865-342-6309. Laura Ayo may be reached at 865-342-6341.

TIMELINE

  • 3-29-2001 - Tim and Jan Hutchison buy lot 38.
  • 8-31-2001 - The Hutchisons apply for a septic-tank permit for lot 38.
  • 9-20-2001 - Tim Hutchison applies for septic-tank permit for lot 37.
  • 9-21-2001 - Hutchison applies for septic-tank permit for lot 37, site 2.
  • 10-1-2001 - Hutchison obtains septic-tank permits for lots 37 and 38.
  • 10-13-2001 - Hutchison buys lot 37.
  • 12-1-2001 - Hutchison deeds lot 37 to Jan Hutchison.
  • 1-29-2002 - Randy Hinton applies for a septic-tank permit for lot 40, site 1; Tim Hutchison obtains septic-tank permit for lot 37, site 2.
  • 1-30-2002 - Hinton obtains a septic-tank permit for lot 40, site 1.
  • 6-3-2002 - RMCH Developers LLC buys lots 39 and 40, plus 41.5 acres of undeveloped land adjacent to the lots.
  • 6-10-2002 - RMCH Developers files articles of organization with the Secretary of State's office.
  • 10-30-2002 - Carleton Bryant reserves the business name "Smoky Trace" with the Secretary of State's Office.
  • 11-6-2002 - Hutchison registers "smokytracecabins.com" as an Internet domain name.
  • 11-22-2002 - Smoky Trace Cabins applies for septic-tank permits for lots 39 and 40; HTJ Properties applies for septic-tank permit for lot 26.
  • 1-6-2003 - HTJ Properties obtains septic-tank permit for lot 40.
  • 1-13-2003 - HTJ Properties obtains septic-tank permit for lot 39.
  • 3-10-2003 - HTJ Construction obtains septic-tank permit for lot 26.
  • 9-24-2003 - KRH Properties buys lot 26.
  • 2-4-2003 - RMCH Developers deeds lots 39 and 40 to Jan Hutchison, and the 41.5-acre tract to Johnnie Conner.
  • 2-12-2003 - The Hutchisons sell 1 acre of lot 37 to Conner.

Sources: Sevier County property records; Sevier County Health Department; Tennessee Secretary of State's office; Network Solutions.


There They Go Again

posted by Media Relations
Knox County Sheriff's Office
Website by Planning and Development
865.215.2461
3/18/2004

In yet another scandalous expose, the Knoxville News Sentinel is preparing a story alleging that Sheriff Tim Hutchison helped Mr. Randy Hinton with the construction of his house. Reporter Scott Barker has spent countless hours researching this elusive story and has now uncovered information that previously was known only to the hundreds of people who are either friends of Hinton or the Sheriff, or who worked on the house.

As Sheriff Hutchison has repeatedly stated to responsible broadcast media, he and Hinton are personal friends. The Sheriff notes that Hinton sought his advice and input on a number of occasions while Hinton was building his house, and the Sheriff was "more than happy to assist my friend. I've assisted many people in building their houses, and just like Randy, never sent them a bill. I'm proud to be a licensed general contractor and I'm equally proud to be the Sheriff. My record clearly speaks for itself- my interest in contracting has never and will never interfere with my duties as Sheriff."

The Sheriff's Office has learned that News Sentinel reporters Scott Barker and Laura Ayo subjected Chief Building Inspector Roy Braden to an hour long interrogation. The News Sentinel has been attempting to establish that a conflict of interest exists between Knox County and Hinton, owner of Chestnut Street Garage. Knox County utilizes a seizure lot maintained by Chestnut Street Garage, under an agreement that has been in place since 1995. All financial arrangements of Knox County, including this one, are audited annually. During every annual audit since 1995, the auditors have not identified this as a problem.

This story is apparently part of a continuing effort by the News Sentinel to prove a business relationship between Hinton and the Sheriff, a relationship that simply does not exist. The newspaper has gone to great extremes in pursuit of this story, including publishing photographs of the Sheriff's cabin in the mountains, along with a full color map describing how to get there. The Sheriff, a thirty-year law enforcement veteran, was disturbed that the News Sentinel would jeopardize his safety and the safety of his family in their efforts to criticize him.


City sues 3 towing outfits

Mayor delivers papers alleging false billing

By SCOTT BARKER, barkers@knews.com
Knoxville News-Sentinel
December 5, 2003

Mayor Victor Ashe hand-delivered a pair of lawsuits Thursday alleging three wrecker companies violated the Tennessee False Claims Act by submitting false documents to the city to conceal a pattern of overcharging customers.

The lawyer for the companies dismissed the mayor's unprecedented act as a publicity stunt and said he looked forward to the court challenge.

Flanked by Deputy Law Director Debra Poplin and city lawyer Alyson Eberting, Ashe strode up to the Knox County Chancery Court counter at 3:16 p.m.

"We've got a lawsuit for you," Ashe said as he handed a bundle of documents to clerk Dottie Davison.

"Actually," Eberting interjected, "we have two."

One lawsuit accuses Cedar Bluff 24-Hour Towing and Chestnut Street Garage of filing fraudulent invoices with the city for towing jobs done at the request of police officers, and for breach of contract. Randy A. Hinton controls both companies.

The second lawsuit, against Sutherland Avenue Wrecker Service, run by Billy A. Mullins Jr., contains the same allegations.

A spot review of documents by the Knoxville Wrecker Commission determined all three companies filed false invoices in June. City officials say a fourth company, Fountain City Wrecker Service, also overcharged customers but wasn't sued because it didn't supply false documents.

The companies tow vehicles for the city under contracts that give them monopolies on calls from police in certain zones of the city. In exchange for the guaranteed work, the companies agreed to lower rates on the calls. The contracts don't cover privately arranged towing jobs.

The lawsuits allege the companies overcharged customers while submitting invoices to the city indicating they'd charged the contracted amount. The companies haven't submitted any invoices since July, and on Oct. 28 they told the city they would drop the pacts effective Dec. 27. The city has put the contracts back out for bid, but the four companies won't be allowed to vie for the work.

Under the False Claims Act, the companies face civil penalties of $2,500 to $10,000 for each violation, and could be forced to pay treble damages.

"Arguably, each false document per tow could be a (separate) claim," Eberting said, adding that city officials don't yet know when the alleged overcharging began or how many invoices could be incorrect. The city also wants the companies to reimburse taxpayers for expenses, legal fees and court costs.

The lawyer representing the towing companies, Michael McGovern, welcomed the opportunity to go before a chancellor.

"We've finally got a place to have a fair forum," he said.

After a brief look at the lawsuits, McGovern said the Tennessee False Claims Act doesn't apply to this situation.

McGovern has said the wrecker companies didn't overcharge customers or submit false documents. He's also attacked the contracts as being ambiguous and contradictory.

Ashe, who leaves office Dec. 20, said Thursday was the first time in his 16 years in office he'd filed lawsuits in person.

"I did it to highlight the inequities, and, really, predatory practices, carried out by the wrecker firms on innocent citizens for overcharging," Ashe said.

McGovern scoffed at Ashe's participation in a routine legal filing as a political ploy.

"I think this is largely grandstanding by the city," McGovern said. "That's unfair to the towing industry and misleading to the city of Knoxville."

Scott Barker may be reached at 865-342-6309.


City to sue wrecker companies today

By Knoxville News-Sentinel staff
December 4, 2003

The city of Knoxville said today it will file lawsuits against wrecker companies alleging they violated Tennessee's False Claims Act and breach of contract claims.

City Staff Attorney Alyson Eberting is preparing the suits.

Mayor Victor Ashe and Deputy City Law Director Debbie Poplin will hold a news availability this afternoon to discuss the action at the Chancery Court Clerk and Masters office.

Four Knoxville firms — Cedar Bluff 24-Hour Towing, Sutherland Avenue Wrecker Service, Fountain City Wrecker Service and Chestnut Street Garage — were barred Monday from bidding for the new city wrecker service contracts.

City officials blacklisted the companies from such contracts for the next five years after accusations that the businesses overcharged customers by as much as three times for initial towing jobs, as well as storage fees, under exclusive contracts to tow vehicles when requested by police.

Michael McGovern, the wrecker services' attorney, continues to argue that his clients did not violate the terms of their contracts, but the companies did run an advertisement in Wednesday's News Sentinel offering to review possible invoice errors and refund any overcharges plus 5 percent interest from the date of payment if mistakes are found.

"The city would recommend that citizens pursue every avenue to recover their lost costs," said Alyson Eberting, in response to the ad. "We cannot collect that money for individuals at this time."

Eberting added that individuals also should consult their own lawyers about appropriate legal action.

The advertisement also specifies that because of "numerous exceptions" to the city contracts, a request for the review of an invoice will not automatically qualify for a refund.

Such overcharges do not include illegally parked vehicles that were towed from private parking lots.

Meanwhile, the city held a pre-bid conference Wednesday for potential bidders on the new three-year contracts, each of which will apply to one of eight geographical areas.

Bids must be returned by Dec. 10 and the new contracts are expected to take affect on Dec. 29.

In a Wednesday letter to city officials, McGovern proposed several legal revisions to the contracts to correct the ambiguities and conflicts that he contends are the real cause for the contested charges of his clients.

Despite his clients' repeated pleas, McGovern said the city has done nothing to correct the flawed contracts' language for some 20 years, adding that he represents several other Knoxville towing companies that are now interested in the new bids.

However, when asked why his accused clients last agreed to the flawed terms in 2001, McGovern said the towers' much-publicized problems began because the city changed the contracts' "unwritten understanding."

"There has been an understanding of how the contracts would be executed," he argued. "The city started changing the way they administered the terms of the contracts midstream."

For instance, McGovern said that police officers began requesting that some cars be towed to the city impound lot rather than traditionally sending them to the firm's own lots, which substantially lessened profits.


Citizens urged to pursue wreckers' settlement offer

By HAYES HICKMAN, hickman@knews.com
Knoxville News-Sentinel
December 4, 2003

While city attorneys continue to research the possibility of a class-action lawsuit against local towing companies for allegedly overcharging customers, they say citizens should feel free to follow through on the companies' own advertised refund offer.

Four Knoxville firms - Cedar Bluff 24-Hour Towing, Sutherland Avenue Wrecker Service, Fountain City Wrecker Service and Chestnut Street Garage - were barred Monday from bidding for the new city wrecker service contracts.

City officials blacklisted the companies from such contracts for the next five years after accusations that the businesses overcharged customers by as much as three times for initial towing jobs, as well as storage fees, under exclusive contracts to tow vehicles when requested by police.

Michael McGovern, the wrecker services' attorney, continues to argue that his clients did not violate the terms of their contracts, but the companies did run an advertisement in Wednesday's News Sentinel offering to review possible invoice errors and refund any overcharges plus 5 percent interest from the date of payment, if mistakes are found.

"The city would recommend that citizens pursue every avenue to recover their lost costs," said city attorney Alyson Eberting, in response to the ad. "We cannot collect that money for individuals at this time."

Eberting added that individuals also should consult their own lawyers about appropriate legal action.

The advertisement also specifies that because of "numerous exceptions" to the city contracts, a request for the review of an invoice will not automatically qualify for a refund.

Such overcharges do not include illegally parked vehicles that were towed from private parking lots.

But the city Law Department is reviewing whether the companies violated the Tennessee False Claims Act by submitting falsified invoices to the city Wrecker Services Commission. And officials also are looking for ways to help citizens and insurance companies file a class-action lawsuit alleging violations of the state Consumer Protection Act.

Meanwhile, the city held a pre-bid conference Wednesday for potential bidders on the new three-year contracts, each of which will apply to one of eight geographical areas.

Bids must be returned by Dec. 10 and the new contracts are expected to take affect on Dec. 29.

In a Wednesday letter to city officials, McGovern proposed several legal revisions to the contracts to correct the ambiguities and conflicts that he contends are the real cause for the contested charges of his clients.

Despite his clients' repeated pleas, McGovern said the city has done nothing to correct the flawed contracts' language for some 20 years, adding that he represents several other Knoxville towing companies that are now interested in the new bids.

However, when asked why his accused clients last agreed to the flawed terms in 2001, McGovern said the towers' much-publicized problems began because the city changed the contracts' "unwritten understanding."

"There has been an understanding of how the contracts would be executed," he argued. "The city started changing the way they administered the terms of the contracts midstream."

For instance, McGovern said that police officers began requesting that some cars be towed to the city impound lot rather than traditionally sending them to the firm's own lots, which substantially lessened profits.

Hayes Hickman may be reached at 865-342-6323.


Wreckers go tow-to-tow

City-contracted firms complain blacklisted ones stealing their business

By HAYES HICKMAN, hickman@knews.com
Knoxville News-Sentinel
March 16, 2004

The city Wrecker Services Commission heard complaints Monday from recently city-contracted towing firms that say they're getting beat to the scene by the same companies that lost their contracts with the city for allegedly overcharging.

Randy Hinton, owner of Cedar Bluff 24-Hour Towing and Chestnut Street Garage, and Joel Smith, president of Fountain City Wrecker Service, snickered at the specific claims against their businesses during the meeting.

Both declined to respond to the allegations afterward.

Commission Chairman Mark Williamson described their attendance, along with Sutherland Avenue Wrecker Service owner Billy Mullins and their attorney Mike McGovern, as an attempt to simply "intimidate and aggravate."

"Frankly, I see it as these guys who had contracts and lost them are still very upset about it. They're trying to be a thorn in the side of everyone involved," Williamson said. "If they were serious about doing something and feel like they've been wronged, then they need to file a lawsuit and get on with it."

Five new companies were awarded city contracts in December after city of Knoxville officials alleged that the Fountain City, Cedar Bluff, Chestnut Street and Sutherland Avenue firms overcharged customers during contracted work.

The city also filed a lawsuit against all but Fountain City Wrecker for submitting false documents. The companies have denied any wrongdoing.

"Running wrecks" has been a common practice for years in the wrecker service industry, as tow drivers use police radio scanners to get a heads-up on car accidents so they can beat their competition to the scene.

The longstanding tactic has raised new questions, however, in light of numerous complaints against the blacklisted companies for allegedly soliciting business away from their replacements at police-requested calls for service.

The contracts set guaranteed prices for work in assigned geographic areas. But they don't cover privately arranged jobs.

"We're all having the same problem," said Rick Carnes, owner of Clinton Highway Services, one of the new contracted companies. "The contracts were taken away because they were doing the wrong thing and they're still doing the wrong thing."

Wrecker commission members scheduled a public hearing for April 5 to hear complaints regarding solicitation and other issues. Meanwhile, the city-contracted firms have been asked to document any such incidents.

Knoxville police officer Phil Major said that officers would soon begin distributing copies of a "Motorists Bill of Rights" at accidents to inform drivers of the price limits offered for towing and storage under city contracts, as opposed to any privately arranged services.

He added that officers also are being trained how to better control access at crash scenes.

Additionally, Williamson said the wrecker commission would focus on what steps could be taken at the legislative level to prohibit at-the-scene solicitations for safety reasons.

"I can assure you," he said, "we will move on this as quickly as possible."

Hayes Hickman may be reached at 865-342-6323.


Hutchison land deals raise conflict questions

By SCOTT BARKER AND LAURA AYO
barkers@knews.com ayol@knews.com
Knoxville News-Sentinel
March 7, 2004

Knox County Sheriff Tim Hutchison is involved in a Sevier County real estate development with a businessman who operates the impound lot for the Sheriff's Office.

Questions about Hutchison and wrecker company executive Randy Hinton's connections to the development prompted Knox County Mayor Mike Ragsdale on Friday to call for a probe into whether a conflict of interest exists.

The 65-acre gated development is draped across three rugged ridges in the rear portion of the Trace 200 subdivision between Pigeon Forge and Wears Valley.

Four houses have been built behind the gates on property owned by Hutchison and his wife, Jan Hutchison. They have deeded one of them to a Karns businesswoman.

At least five companies and a half-dozen people have engaged in a series of land transactions and house-building activity in the development over the past three years, according to real estate deeds, permit applications, state and county business documents and other public records.

Hutchison, who makes more than $104,000 a year as sheriff and operates a construction business, has identified himself as a general partner in a limited liability company that bought 48 acres of land in and around Trace 200 for $1.32 million in 2002. The company, RMCH Developers LLC, got rid of its holdings last month for an undisclosed amount.

Three other companies with connections to Hutchison have performed various activities in the development.

Sheriff's Office employees did some of the administrative tasks associated with acquiring the property.

Hinton, president of Chestnut Street Garage and Cedar Bluff Towing, obtained a permit for a building site now owned by Jan Hutchison. A longtime political contributor to the sheriff, Hinton also may have bought a lot in the gated development through a company he and his wife have used to buy land in Knox County.

Records show the Sheriff's Office has been paying Hinton's Chestnut Street Garage $24,000 per year since 1998 to operate an impound lot for seized, abandoned and wrecked vehicles. Officials in the Knox County finance and law director's offices have been unable to find a written contract governing the arrangement.

Both of Hinton's companies tow county-owned vehicles under a contract and private vehicles at the request of deputies.

As part of a routine process to update vendor information, Hinton maintained he has no conflict of interest with any county official in an affidavit submitted to the Knox County Purchasing Department two weeks ago.

He didn't return phone messages left Friday at both his wrecker companies.

Hutchison did not agree to answer questions arising from the land deals.

"This is the Sheriff's response to any questions you may have and he expects you to print it," Sheriff's Office spokeswoman Martha Dooley wrote in a statement faxed Friday to the News Sentinel. The statement said:

"I'm sorry you're behind, but the Knoxville Journal had a picture of the family cabin and the property almost two years ago. I hope this answers any questions you have about my personal affairs."

On Friday, Ragsdale said his office would review documents to determine whether a conflict of interest exists.

"We will investigate it," Ragsdale said.

Behind the gates

Hutchison owns a 3,288-square-foot house with soaring gables on a ridge overlooking a steep gap locals call the Narrows near Wears Valley. For property tax purposes, it's valued at $209,700.

The Hutchisons began assembling their property in Trace 200 in 2001 by purchasing two lots totaling 13.5 acres for $52,800.

Mike Ruble, a Sheriff's Office in-house legal adviser, prepared some of the property deeds for those lots. Ruble did not return a phone message on Friday.

RMCH Developers started buying property in the development the next year, even before the company technically existed. The company paid $1.32 million to Nickey Maxey, a South Carolina-based businessman and former Tennessee Highway Patrol officer, for two lots in Trace 200 and an adjacent undeveloped 41.5-acre tract.

When RMCH Developers filed its articles of organization a week later, Carleton "Butch" Bryant IV, also a Sheriff's Office in-house legal adviser, was named the company's organizer and registered agent. Bryant did not return a phone message on Friday.

The articles didn't contain the identities of RMCH Developers' members. However, Hutchison later described himself as a "general partner" when the firm deeded the property last month to his wife and Johnnie Conner, a Karns businesswoman and vice president of the Knox County Library System board of trustees.

Another company, KRH Properties, entered the development six months ago when it paid $35,000 for one lot next to property then owned by RMCH Developers.

Though the deed doesn't reveal the identities of the principals in KRH Properties, Hinton and his wife, Kimberly, did business as KRH Properties two months later when they bought land in Knox County.

On the Sevier County deed, KRH Properties' address is listed as a post office box Hutchison used as his campaign mailing address during the last two elections. The deed for the Hintons' Knox County transaction, however, has a different post office box listed for the company.

In addition to the Hutchisons' house, there is a 4,882-square-foot house featuring a kidney-shaped pool on property now belonging to Conner. Before the Hutchisons subdivided the 6.5-acre plot, the house and grounds were valued at $329,100 for tax purposes.

The other two houses are on property RMCH Developers deeded to Jan Hutchison on Feb. 4. Hinton had obtained a septic-tank permit for a 1,200-square-foot cabin on the property, while a Hutchison company took out the septic-tank permit for another building site on the same lot.

Maxey, who in the early 1990s held a controversial no-bid contract with the Sheriff's Office to operate jailhouse payphones, owns a lot that also appears to be behind the gates. Maxey also owns 12 other lots in the subdivision and two adjacent parcels. A message left at his Hilton Head, S.C., office wasn't returned Friday.

More construction appears to be in the works. Hutchison or Hutchison companies have obtained septic-tank permits for at least three other building sites, including one on the lot now owned by KRH Properties.

A roadbed has been cut along the hardwood-crowned ridge that makes up the bulk of the 41.5-acre tract adjacent to Trace 200, and earth-moving equipment was parked on the roadbed on a recent afternoon.

RMCH Developers transferred the tract on Feb. 4 to Conner, who also owns about 78 acres of undeveloped commercial property in West Knox County with Hutchison.

Reached by phone on Friday, Conner wouldn't say what, if anything, she planned to do with her Sevier County property.

She also faxed a response:

"You contacted me regarding a statement about property I own in Sevier County. This is property that I purchased with a like-kind exchange from sale of property I owned on Oak Ridge Highway to Knox County Government for a park in Karns."

Since the area is inside the Pigeon Forge urban growth boundary, the Pigeon Forge Planning Commission would have to approve subdividing the tract. No subdivision plans had been submitted as of late last month.

While documents don't reveal what is planned for the development, Bryant reserved the name "Smoky Trace" with state officials for business use. A Hutchison company, HTJ Properties, then used the name "Smoky Trace Cabins" when applying for permits for two lots in the subdivision.

Hutchison also secured "smokytracecabins.com" as an Internet domain name, but the site isn't up and running.

Under scrutiny

Questions about the sheriff and Hinton's involvement in Trace 200 follow city of Knoxville sanctions against Hinton's wrecker companies.

Late last year, Knoxville officials barred Hinton's companies and two other towing firms from holding municipal contracts for five years because, they claim, the wrecker services overcharged customers.

The city has sued Hinton's companies along with Sutherland Avenue Wrecker service, accusing them of submitting false documents to regulators. The fourth barred company, Fountain City Wrecker Service, wasn't sued.

The lawyer for the four companies has denied the allegations.

Knox County taxpayers paid Hinton companies $37,653 in fiscal year 2003 for towing and related services, including the impound lot.

The impound lot stores vehicles and other goods seized as evidence during investigations. Also, funds obtained through auctions of seized property supplement the Sheriff's Office budget.

Last week the Knox County Purchasing Department solicited proposals for a private contractor to run an impound lot. The county is also trying to work out a deal to share a facility with the city.

Not all county purchases, including those made by the Sheriff's Office, must go through the Purchasing Department.

But Ragsdale said he is determined to follow every rule and regulation in place when they do.

"If they come through us, we're going to follow the rules this time and every time," he said.

If officials determine a conflict of interest exists because of the Trace 200 dealings, they could bar Chestnut Street Garage and Cedar Bluff Towing from holding county contracts for one year, Knox County Purchasing Director Hugh Holt said.

The Knox County procurement manual states that a conflict of interest exists when an employee "has a direct or indirect interest in or relationship with an outsider that is inherently unethical or that might be implied or construed to be or make possible personal gain because of the employee's partiality toward the outsider for personal reasons or otherwise inhibit the impartiality of the employee's business judgment."

Penalties for violating its conflict of interest provisions range from verbal warnings to termination of employment.

However, officials said the Purchasing Department couldn't force independent officeholders like the sheriff to comply with its regulations.

Ragsdale said he hoped every official would follow the county's purchasing guidelines on every transaction.

"I can't dictate or mandate that," Ragsdale said. "I can only encourage that."

Scott Barker may be reached at 865-342-6309. Laura Ayo may be reached at 865-342-6341.


SHERIFF: WON'T TAKE CITY UP ON OFFER OF FREE IMPOUND LOT

Sheriff bills taxpayers an extra $50,000 for tow truckering

Reporter: Jim Ragonese
WBIR TV
3/24/2004

In an interview with Action 10 News on Tuesday, Knox County Sheriff Tim Hutchison said the city of Knoxville's offer of a free impound lot isn't feasible, despite the fact that the city's offer could save taxpayers tens of thousands of dollars.

Currently, Knox County's impound lot is operated by Chestnut Street Garage, which has provided the service and space for the past nine years via an unwritten $24,000-a-year contract with the Sheriff's Department.

Chestnut Street Garage is owned by Randy Hinton. The relationship between Hinton and Hutchison has been called into question in recent weeks after it was revealed that the two men both own property in a Sevier County land development project.

Additionally, the Knoxville News Sentinel reported on Friday that Sheriff Hutchison, who is a licensed contractor, has provided contracting services to Hinton at no cost.

Hutchison says he's helped many people in building their houses and has never been paid. He has also said that the Knoxville newspaper has a "vendetta" against him.

In response to these issues, Knox County Mayor Mike Ragsdale convened a three-person panel to investigate Sheriff Hutchison's relationship with Hinton for possible ethical conflicts.

The panel was due to deliver its findings on Monday, but after the newest allegations of impropriety, the investigators have now asked for more time, saying a report will be released on April 9th.

Also in response to the questions surrounding the private business relationships between Hutchison and Hinton, Ragsdale called for other companies to bid on the impound contract currently held by Chestnut Street Garage, via a standard government bidding process.

According to the Knox County Sheriff's Office website, Hinton's bid is the only one that has been received, and he wants to double his current charges to $48,000 per year.

In his statement posted Monday night on the Sheriff's Department website, Hutchison offered his view on Hinton's bid, stating that, "This simply confirms what we knew all along - Chestnut Street has provided Knox County with an essential service for a price that is well below market rates, and they've done it for years."

Speaking to Action 10 News by phone on Monday night, Knox County Public Information Officer Mike Cohen said it's important to have written contracts and a competitive bidding process.

"When the county is spending the public's money, it has a responsibility to make sure the money is spent fairly and properly," explained Cohen. "Government is the law and we can't be above it. We have to set the standard."

Cohen also noted that Knox County is considering Knoxville's offer to use its impound lot at no cost.

But today, Sheriff Hutchison said that the County can't use the city's lot, citing concerns with space and liability issues.

"I'm not gonna release that liability to any other agency or department. I'm responsible for those (vehicles). Regardless of how they treat it, or how they watched it, if something's missing, I'm still responsible," explained Hutchison.

The Sheriff says that, despite Hinton's newly doubled fees, he plans to continue using Chestnut Street Garage. Hutchison says he'll make up the cost difference between the current contract and the new bid price using his Department's drug fund money.


KNOX SHERIFF HELPED TOW EXECUTIVE BUILD HOUSE

Reporter: Associated Press Copyright
WBIR TV
3/20/2004

Knox County's sheriff is admitting he gave free construction advice to an executive who runs an impound lot for the department.

A panel is investigating possible conflict of interest involving Sheriff Tim Hutchison.

The Knoxville News Sentinel reports today that three construction inspectors say they met with Hutchison at a building site owned by Randy Hinton. Hinton runs an impound lot and another company that tows vehicles at the request of sheriff's deputies.

The sheriff is a licensed general contractor. Hutchison says he's helped many people in building their houses and never been paid.

The investigative panel could rule that Hinton should be barred for a year from holding county contracts.


Panel on sheriff extends deadline

By SCOTT BARKER AND LAURA AYO
barkers@knews.com ayol@knews.com
Knoxville News-Sentinel
March 20, 2004

A panel looking into whether a conflict of interest exists between Knox County Sheriff Tim Hutchison and a county contractor will not report its findings until April 9.

Knox County Mayor Mike Ragsdale said in a press release Friday that the three people on the panel requested the extension in order to do a "fair and thorough" job and to fulfill their other commitments.

The inquiry centers on Hutchison's relationship with Randy Hinton, owner of Chestnut Street Garage and Cedar Bluff Towing. Hutchison, a licensed general contractor, has repeatedly denied that he has personal business dealings with Hinton, though he acknowledged Thursday on the Sheriff's Office Web site that he helped build Hinton's lakefront home free of charge.

Records show Chestnut Street Garage has operated the Sheriff's Office seizure lot for $2,000 a month since 1998. County officials have been unable to find a contract governing the arrangement.

Both of Hinton's companies tow county-owned vehicles under a contract and private vehicles at the request of deputies. Hutchison has said he and Hinton, a longtime political contributor to the sheriff, are friends.

Ragsdale had asked the conflict-of-interest panel to submit a report on Monday. That's the same day proposals are due from companies interested in operating the Sheriff's Office seizure lot.

Knox County Purchasing Director Hugh Holt, who is a member of the panel, said delaying the report wouldn't cause a similar delay in considering the proposals.

"We're not canceling," Holt said. "We are going ahead with that."

Knox County Finance Department officials persuaded Hutchison to put the seizure lot business up for competition after the News Sentinel published a story about the no-bid, unwritten arrangement.

The newspaper began looking into the county's towing business after city of Knoxville officials banned Hinton's towing firms and two others from municipal contracts.

City officials have accused the wrecker services of overcharging customers. The firms have denied any wrongdoing.

The county's request for proposals calls for a 450-vehicle seizure lot, plus a three-bay facility for the storage of vehicles kept for investigations.

If a company other than Chestnut Street Garage gets the contract, the new contractor would have to pay Chestnut Street about $30,000 as reimbursement for expenses already incurred for the existing inventory, Holt said.

If the investigative panel determines a conflict of interest exists, Holt said, Hinton's companies could be barred from county contracts for one year. Hinton maintained in an affidavit submitted to the county last month that he doesn't have a conflict of interest with any county official.

Ragsdale appointed the panel after the News Sentinel published a story detailing Hutchison and Hinton's involvement in a gated Sevier County real-estate development.

Hutchison, Hinton and two other associates of the sheriff own the roughly 65 acres of property behind the gates.

Records show a Hutchison company obtained a septic-tank permit for property now owned by a Hinton company. Hinton also obtained a septic-tank permit for a lot now owned by Hutchison's wife, Jan.

Hutchison has said publicly that both his family and the Hintons own houses inside the Trace 200 subdivision.

Sheriff's Office employees performed some of the administrative tasks associated with acquiring the property, including the preparation of a deed for a Hinton company. Hutchison has said his employees did the work on their own time and were compensated for it.

Scott Barker may be reached at 865-342-6309. Laura Ayo may be reached at 865-342-6341.


SHERIFF: WON'T TAKE CITY UP ON OFFER OF FREE IMPOUND LOT

Reporter: Jim Ragonese
WBIR TV
3/24/2004

In an interview with Action 10 News on Tuesday, Knox County Sheriff Tim Hutchison said the city of Knoxville's offer of a free impound lot isn't feasible, despite the fact that the city's offer could save taxpayers tens of thousands of dollars.

Currently, Knox County's impound lot is operated by Chestnut Street Garage, which has provided the service and space for the past nine years via an unwritten $24,000-a-year contract with the Sheriff's Department.

Chestnut Street Garage is owned by Randy Hinton. The relationship between Hinton and Hutchison has been called into question in recent weeks after it was revealed that the two men both own property in a Sevier County land development project.

Additionally, the Knoxville News Sentinel reported on Friday that Sheriff Hutchison, who is a licensed contractor, has provided contracting services to Hinton at no cost.

Hutchison says he's helped many people in building their houses and has never been paid. He has also said that the Knoxville newspaper has a "vendetta" against him.

In response to these issues, Knox County Mayor Mike Ragsdale convened a three-person panel to investigate Sheriff Hutchison's relationship with Hinton for possible ethical conflicts.

The panel was due to deliver its findings on Monday, but after the newest allegations of impropriety, the investigators have now asked for more time, saying a report will be released on April 9th.

Also in response to the questions surrounding the private business relationships between Hutchison and Hinton, Ragsdale called for other companies to bid on the impound contract currently held by Chestnut Street Garage, via a standard government bidding process.

According to the Knox County Sheriff's Office website, Hinton's bid is the only one that has been received, and he wants to double his current charges to $48,000 per year.

In his statement posted Monday night on the Sheriff's Department website, Hutchison offered his view on Hinton's bid, stating that, "This simply confirms what we knew all along - Chestnut Street has provided Knox County with an essential service for a price that is well below market rates, and they've done it for years."

Speaking to Action 10 News by phone on Monday night, Knox County Public Information Officer Mike Cohen said it's important to have written contracts and a competitive bidding process.

"When the county is spending the public's money, it has a responsibility to make sure the money is spent fairly and properly," explained Cohen. "Government is the law and we can't be above it. We have to set the standard."

Cohen also noted that Knox County is considering Knoxville's offer to use its impound lot at no cost.

But today, Sheriff Hutchison said that the County can't use the city's lot, citing concerns with space and liability issues.

"I'm not gonna release that liability to any other agency or department. I'm responsible for those (vehicles). Regardless of how they treat it, or how they watched it, if something's missing, I'm still responsible," explained Hutchison.

The Sheriff says that, despite Hinton's newly doubled fees, he plans to continue using Chestnut Street Garage. Hutchison says he'll make up the cost difference between the current contract and the new bid price using his Department's drug fund money.

RELATED STORIES FROM WBIR.COM:

Sheriff Accuses Knoxville News Sentinel of "Vendetta"

Knoxville Sues Hinton-owned Tow Company for Overcharging


SHERIFF ACCUSES NEWS SENTINEL OF ''VENDETTA''

Reporter: Jim Ragonese
WBIR TV
3/10/2004

In an interview with Action 10 News today, Knox County Sheriff Tim Hutchison defended himself against allegations of ethical impropriety.

At issue is a private business relationship between Hutchison and Randy Hinton, owner of a local car impound lot. Hinton's lot is the recipient of a no-bid, $2,000-a- month contract with the Knox County Sheriff's Department.

The Knoxville News Sentinel reported in its Sunday edition that Hutchison and Hinton are both investors in a 65-acre land development project located between Wears Valley and Pigeon Forge in Sevier County.

According to Hutchison, the issue isn't his dealings with Hinton, but rather the News Sentinel's coverage.

"Everyone is reacting to a story by the Knoxville News Sentinel," says Hutchison. "But everyone knows that they have a personal and political vendetta against me. It's been going on for thirteen-plus years."

Hutchison says the News Sentinel didn't uncover any wrongdoing.

"They never did say that I had done anything unethical or wrong. They just implied it and wanted the reader to leave with the impression and the headlines and bylines that something's wrong and I need to be investigated."

Knox County Mayor Mike Ragsdale reacted swiftly to the allegations raised by the News Sentinel's reporting and on Monday named three individuals to a panel that will investigate the matter.

Named to the investigative panel were:

  • Richard Walls, internal auditor for Knox County Commission.
  • Hugh Holt, Knox County purchasing director.
  • David Eldridge, a prominent local attorney in private practice.

Ragsdale has directed that the probe be completed within two weeks. If any wrongdoing is uncovered, Hinton's company could lose its contract with the Sheriff's Department.

Hutchison says that he has no problem with any inquiry into the matter.

"I welcome any investigation from Mr. Ragsdale or anyone else. I haven't done anything wrong and neither has anyone else around here," says Hutchison.


CITY FILES LAWSUIT OVER TOWING CHARGES

Reporter: Jim Ragonese
WBIR TV
12/8/2003

Some towing companies accused of overcharging people for a tow in Knoxville now face legal action.

The City of Knoxville filed a class action suit late Thursday afternoon against three different Knoxville wrecker services.

The city says if your car was towed in the City of Knoxville, there is a good chance you paid too much for that service. The law department says recent audits show repeated overcharges by some of the companies under contract to tow cars for the city.

The city's lawsuit says it is time for those towing companies to be responsible for their actions.

Cedar Bluff Towing, Sutherland Avenue Wrecker Service, and Chestnut Street Garage are all named in the lawsuits. They all agreed to set rates to tow cars for the city.

City attorneys who filed the suits say the companies all broke the agreements and overcharged either car owners or their insurance companies.

Knoxville Mayor Victor Ashe said the courts need to stop that practice.

The city also claims the receipts turned in by the wrecker companies show they charged one price, but their investigations show the companies actually charged significantly higher prices.

In the lawsuits the city says that violated the False Claims Act.

Michael McGovern, the attorney for the towing companies disagrees.

McGovern said, "The claim that they've made under the False Claims Act, it's a relatively new law. I haven't had a chance to look at the complaint, but what I know about the law is, it appears it is not even applicable in this situation."

Both sides believe the courts can settle this argument.

This case only seeks damages for the city. The mayor says if individuals or insurance companies believe they have been overcharged, they may want to hire an attorney.

No specific amount was specified in the lawsuit. If the False Claim Act applies to this case, it could bring up to $10,000 per case. The city says it is still investigating to figure just how many cases exist.


Panel to examine Hutchison's possible conflict of interest

Ragsdale gives team two weeks 'to look at all the questions'

By SCOTT BARKER AND LAURA AYO
barkers@knews.com, ayol@knews.com
Knoxville News-Sentinel
March 9, 2004

Knox County Mayor Mike Ragsdale named a three-person panel Monday to investigate a possible conflict of interest involving Knox County Sheriff Tim Hutchison and the operator of the Sheriff's Office impound lot.

Knox County Purchasing Director Hugh Holt, Knox County Commission Internal Auditor Richard Walls and former Knox County Election Commission Chairman David Eldridge have two weeks to determine whether a conflict of interest exists.

"The public needs to be assured that money is being properly spent," Ragsdale wrote in a press release late Monday afternoon. "If it is, people's names need to be cleared. If it is not, then we need to take whatever action is needed to restore integrity to the process."

Ragsdale called for the probe on Friday after learning about the sheriff's involvement in a Sevier County real estate development.

Officials say they can't force independent officeholders such as the sheriff to follow procurement rules.

However, the Purchasing Department can bar Hinton's companies from holding county contracts for one year if they determine a conflict of interest exists.

Public records show Hutchison and Randy Hinton, owner of Chestnut Street Garage and Cedar Bluff Towing, are involved in a 65-acre gated development between Pigeon Forge and Wears Valley.

Hinton obtained a septic-tank permit for a building site on a lot in the development now owned by Jan Hutchison, Hutchison's wife. A Hutchison company took out a septic-tank permit for another building site on the same lot.

Also, KRH Properties - a name under which Hinton and his wife, Kimberly, have done business in Knox County - bought another lot in the gated area.

Ragsdale spokesman Mike Cohen said the panel would look into all aspects of the development activities.

"I don't know that we've set any parameters. Certainly they'll look at stuff like if county employees are going to work outside their duties. It may be we need some sort of system in place," Cohen said.

Sheriff's Office staff prepared many of the deeds used to buy land in the development. For example, in-house legal adviser Carleton "Butch" Bryant IV drew up a deed for KRH Properties.

Ragsdale wrote in the release that a number of people, including county commissioners, have called for an investigation into whether a conflict of interest exists.

"We're basically going to get this committee to look at all the questions being raised. We're not asking them to launch a gargantuan probe into how government works," Cohen said.

Cohen said the committee's makeup - the purchasing director, County Commission's internal auditor and a Knoxville lawyer not affiliated with county government - is balanced enough to provide a fair inquiry.

Law Director Mike Moyers will assist the panel, but he isn't a full member because of his duties as the sheriff's lawyer in official matters, Cohen said.

"Moyers will certainly be involved," Cohen said. "Given that he represents the sheriff, we needed to have an attorney on there who doesn't have a connection to Knox County government."

Records show the Sheriff's Office has been paying Hinton's Chestnut Street Garage $24,000 per year since 1998 to operate an impound lot for seized, abandoned and wrecked vehicles. Officials in the Knox County finance and law director's offices have been unable to find a written contract governing the arrangement. Hinton is a longtime political contributor to the sheriff.

Both of Hinton's companies tow county-owned vehicles under a contract and private vehicles at the request of deputies.

Knox County taxpayers paid Hinton companies $37,653 in fiscal year 2003 for towing and related services, including the impound lot.

The impound lot stores vehicles and other goods seized as evidence during investigations. Also, funds obtained through auctions of seized property supplement the Sheriff's Office budget.

The Knox County procurement manual states that a conflict of interest exists when an employee "has a direct or indirect interest in or relationship with an outsider that is inherently unethical or that might be implied or construed to be or make possible personal gain because of the employee's partiality toward the outsider for personal reasons or otherwise inhibit the impartiality of the employee's business judgment."

Ragsdale's office persuaded Hutchison to go along with issuing a request for proposals to run the impound lot after the News Sentinel reported the unwritten arrangement between the Sheriff's Office and Hinton's Chestnut Street Garage.

County officials are also considering sharing a facility with the city of Knoxville.

Scott Barker may be reached at 865-342-6309. Laura Ayo may be reached at 865-342-6341.

The panel

March 9, 2004

David Eldridge

  • Managing partner in Eldridge & Blakney PC
  • Licensed attorney since 1987, working with the law firm of Ritchie, Fels & Dillard PC from 1988 until leaving in September to start new firm
  • Knox County Election Commission member from 1998 to 2003
  • President-elect of the Knoxville Bar Association

Hugh Holt

  • Knox County purchasing director since 1998
  • Knox County employee since 1989, holding positions of auditor/inventory analyst, materials control supervisor, assistant purchasing agent, purchasing agent and purchasing director
  • Certified public purchasing buyer and certified professional procurement officer through the National Institute of Governmental Purchasing

Richard Walls

  • Knox County Commission's internal auditor since 2001
  • Licensed certified public accountant
  • Former corporate controller of the Electro-Mechanical Corp. in Bristol, Va.; worked for Joseph Decosimo Co., which audited government entities


Sheriff alleges he has done nothing illegal

By SCOTT BARKER, barkers@knews.com
Knoxville News-Sentinel
March 9, 2004

Sheriff Tim Hutchison said Monday he has done nothing illegal or unethical in his involvement with businessman Randy Hinton in a Sevier County real estate development.

"Am I partners in business with anybody who does business with the county? Absolutely not," he told members of the West Knox Republican Club at the Copper Cellar on Kingston Pike.

The four-term sheriff didn't agree to an interview with a reporter, but spent a few minutes at the end of his speech addressing the issues behind the county's probe into a possible conflict of interest.

Hutchison acknowledged he and Hinton, a businessman who operates the impound lot for the Sheriff's Office, have built houses in a gated development near Wears Valley.

With the exception of one of the sheriff's lots, Hutchison and Hinton bought their property from Nickey Maxey, a South Carolina businessman who once held a controversial no-bid payphone contract with the Sheriff's Office.

Hutchison said the News Sentinel's coverage of his real estate dealings in Sevier County is a "vendetta" that has nothing to do with his job performance.

"It's a personal attack on me," he said.

Hutchison said his primary objection, as the head of a law enforcement agency, was that the News Sentinel printed a map to his Sevier County house.

"I certainly don't appreciate the paper doing that," he said.

The four-term sheriff also said there is nothing wrong with using his employees to prepare and notarize documents for his private land transactions. Many of his employees work second jobs, he said, which is fine with him "if it doesn't conflict with the Sheriff's Office or the county."

Hutchison, a licensed general contractor, said that he, too, is entitled to have business interests outside his official duties.

"What I do out there is really my business," he said.


New bidders sought for city wrecker contracts

Companies accused of overcharging ineligible

By SCOTT BARKER, barkers@knews.com
Knoxville News-Sentinel
December 2, 2003

The city of Knoxville has requested bids for new wrecker service contracts, but four companies accused of overcharging customers won't be allowed to compete.

City officials said Monday it will be five years before they will be eligible to vie for municipal contracts.

The request for bids went out late Wednesday, just before the holiday weekend. The contracts will give winning bidders exclusive rights in various areas of the city to tow city vehicles and private vehicles when requested by police.

Potential bidders for the three-year contracts aren't limited to Knoxville companies, and all bids must be returned by 11 a.m. Wednesday, Dec. 10.

Cedar Bluff 24-Hour Towing, Sutherland Avenue Wrecker Service, Fountain City Wrecker Service and Chestnut Street Garage won't be among the respondents.

"These firms have knowingly and willfully violated the city contracts. They have earned this penalty," Mayor Victor Ashe said.

The Knoxville Law Department sent letters to the companies on Monday telling them they're not eligible to compete for the contracts, which are worth hundreds of thousands of dollars in business annually.

Citing provisions of the existing contracts, Alyson Eberting of the Knoxville Law Department wrote to the companies that, "you will not be eligible to participate in subsequent City towing and wrecker service contracts for the next five (5) years."

A city officials' review of records showed the companies overcharged customers by as much as three times for initial towing jobs. The records also show they overcharged on storage fees. Cedar Bluff 24-Hour Towing, Sutherland Avenue Wrecker Service and Fountain City Wrecker Service submitted false or altered documents to the city, officials say, while Fountain City Wrecker Service didn't turn in documents at all.

The companies have denied wrongdoing. Their lawyer, Michael McGovern, couldn't be reached for comment late Monday.

McGovern has said many of the incidents cited by the city actually fell outside the scope of the contracts, allowing the companies to charge the market rate. He also said rising fuel and insurance costs make the work unprofitable for the firms.

The companies gave up their contracts in October, after the Knoxville Wrecker Commission scheduled public hearings into the matter. They will stay on the job until the new contractors take over on Dec. 29.

The city is divided into eight geographic areas for the purposes of the contracts. Contracts for seven of the areas will be up for bids. Only the contract for South Knoxville won't be up for grabs. The contractor for South Knoxville, Floyd's Wrecker Service, hasn't overcharged customers, according to the city's review.

City officials will hold a pre-bid conference for interested companies on Wednesday. Ashe, who leaves office in three weeks, said he would call a special session of City Council to consider the new contracts before his successor, Bill Haslam, is inaugurated on Dec. 20.

"The easiest thing for me to do is nothing," Ashe said. "If the mayor's not willing to step forward and take the lead role, then who is?"

Ashe said the Law Department is reviewing whether the companies violated the Tennessee False Claims Act by submitting false documents. Officials are also looking for ways to help citizens and insurance companies file a class-action lawsuit alleging violations of the Tennessee Consumer Protection Act.

Scott Barker may be reached at 865-342-6309.


Council approves new tow contracts

7-0 vote doesn't include any companies accused of overcharging public

By SCOTT BARKER, barkers@knews.com
Knoxville News-Sentinel
December 19, 2003

Meeting in special session for the final time in the Mayor Victor Ashe era, the Knoxville City Council on Thursday approved new contracts with four wrecker services.

Ashe hailed the 7-0 vote as a boon to consumers in the wake of alleged overcharging under the current contracts, though the lawyer for four companies accused of gouging customers warned taxpayers would wind up paying more in the future.

Jim's Wrecker Service, Lowe's Garage & Towing, Clinton Highway Wrecker Service and G & S Towing will begin towing vehicles for the city Dec. 28.

The companies join Floyd's Wrecker Service - the only holder of an existing contract untainted by allegations of overcharging - as the city's towing contractors.

"The consumer in this city is better off because of what this council has done today," Ashe said.

One contract is still pending. A background check showed the lot operated by Clark's Towing isn't properly zoned, police said. Alyson Eberting, a lawyer for the city, said her office is reviewing whether the company can substitute another lot while going through the rezoning process.

"If they rezone it, I'm fine," owner Clark Percell said.

Eberting said City Council could consider the contract with Clark's Towing as early as Tuesday. Percell said he's spent about $45,000 on new trucks and lot improvements, which would be wasted if the agreement falls through.

The contracts cover towing jobs made at the request and direction of police or other city employees. They don't regulate privately arranged towing jobs.

Under the terms of the agreements, the firms charge rates lower than market value in exchange for guaranteed work in various sectors of the city.

A spot check by the Knoxville Wrecker Commission showed four companies currently under contract with the city - Cedar Bluff 24-Hour Towing, Chestnut Street Garage, Sutherland Avenue Wrecker Service and Fountain City Wrecker Service - overcharged customers while doing contract work.

The city has sued Cedar Bluff, Chestnut Street and Sutherland Avenue for allegedly filing false documents. The firms have denied any wrongdoing.

The lawyer for the four companies accused of overcharging, Michael McGovern, said the consumers aren't coming out as well as promised under the new arrangements. He noted that contract prices for towing privately owned vehicles are higher, for the most part, under the new pacts. Also, he said, the city will pay an estimated $100,000 more for towing city-owned vehicles.

Ashe dismissed those concerns, saying McGovern's clients "are not good sources."

Though representatives of the four outgoing companies attended the council meeting, they declined to comment on how the controversy has affected their business.

At least one new contractor said his business received a boost in the number of calls for service since his competitors' problems surfaced in recent weeks.

"It's been a positive for us," said Rick Carnes, owner of Clinton Highway Wrecker Service. "We've picked up some commercial accounts and some individuals."

Scott Barker may be reached at 865-342-6309.


Council wrecker vote today

By LAURA AYO AND SCOTT BARKER
ayol@knews.com and barkers@knews.com
Knoxville News-Sentinel
December 18, 2003

Five bidders pass inspection; one fails and another service trying to meet requirements

Inspectors cleared five contenders for the city's new wrecker-service contracts on Wednesday, but their findings left one firm scrambling to meet eligibility requirements and another one out of the running altogether.

The Knoxville City Council is meeting today to vote on the contracts, which were put out to bid in the wake of accusations of overcharging by current contract holders.

City Purchasing Director J.F. Workman said late Wednesday he will recommend Jim's Garage and Wrecker Service, Lowe's Garage and Towing Service, Clinton Highway Wrecker Service, Floyd's Wrecker Service and G & S Towing for six of eight service areas. G & S will be recommended for two of the zones.

Workman also will recommend Clark's Towing, a contender for the seventh zone, if last-minute inspections indicate the company meets zoning requirements.

Knoxville Police Department spokesman Darrell DeBusk said Clark's Western Avenue lot was improperly zoned to receive a contract. But owner Clark Percell told inspectors he has a properly zoned lot off Lovell Road he could use.

DeBusk said inspectors were looking at the facility late Wednesday.

"This is ridiculous," Percell fumed. "I've been at the same location for a year. And I've never had a problem."

Inspectors disqualified Conner Towing because co-owner Christopher Michael Conner is a convicted felon, DeBusk said.

Court records show Conner, 28, has convictions for assault, burglary, theft of property, vandalism, driving on a suspended license, reckless endangerment, public intoxication and resisting arrest. Conner accumulated the charges in the mid-1990s.

The records also show he's facing two aggravated assault charges, stemming from separate incidents, that are pending before a Knox County grand jury.

Kimberly Conner, his wife and co-owner of the towing company, told authorities her husband used his tow truck to run her vehicle off Berry Road on Jan. 14, one complaint states. On March 2, according to the second complaint, she said Conner punched her and cut her with a kitchen knife.

On Wednesday, however, Kimberly Conner defended her husband, saying his convictions were for offenses committed nearly a decade ago.

"He's not been convicted of anything," she said of the pending charges.

Kimberly Conner said her husband is listed as a co-owner only because they are married and that the company's assets are in her name. She complained that city officials should have notified her of any eligibility problems before she spent about $3,000 getting ready to take on the city's contract.

Several firms still are trying to obtain enough trucks to meet the city's requirements. Workman said the council can award the contracts today to those companies, contingent on their having enough vehicles by Dec. 28, the date the contracts start.

The city barred four current towing contractors - Cedar Bluff 24-Hour Towing, Chestnut Street Garage, Fountain City Wrecker Service and Sutherland Avenue Wrecker Service - from bidding on the new pacts. All but Fountain City have been sued by the city.

Laura Ayo may be reached at 865-342-6341. Scott Barker may be reached at 865-342-6309.


Owner of wrecker service says low bids are unrealistic

By LAURA AYO, ayol@knews.com
Knoxville News-Sentinel
December 15, 2003

A Knoxville wrecker-service veteran challenged city officials to look beyond low bids for city towing contracts as a way to assure fairness to the public and integrity to the industry.

After the low bids for contracts were announced last week, Clinton Highway Wrecker Service owner Rick Carnes expressed concern that some of the bids were unrealistically low.

"We are operating a high-maintenance business," said Carnes, who said he's the vice president of Tennessee Towing and Recovery Professionals. "The cost of doing business is astronomical compared to what we were doing 15 years ago."

Carnes said he's concerned some of the low bidders, particularly companies fairly new to the towing industry, won't be able to fulfill the contracts' requirements with the low fees they've proposed.

"They have no clue what they're really bidding on," he said.

Six companies - Clark's Towing, Clinton Highway Wrecker Service, Conner Towing, G & S Towing, Jim's Garage and Wrecker Service, and Lowe's Garage and Towing - are contenders for contracts to provide wrecker services to seven of the eight service zones in the city.

Wrecker inspectors expect to complete their inspections of those companies, their facilities and vehicles by Wednesday, according to Knoxville Police Department officer Phil Major.

"One of the considerations as far as what is looked at is experience," Major said.

And City Purchasing Director J.F. Workman said the whole point of the inspection process is to determine whether the low bidders can handle the terms of the contracts.

In addition to having to man their lots 24 hours a day every day of the year, the companies have to meet lot size, lighting, zoning, licensing, storage and minimum vehicle requirements.

"We're trying to make a decision whether they can do the contract," Workman said. "If they can handle the contract, have the equipment and are licensed, they will be given the contract. That's just one of those things we have to do."

City Councilman Mark Brown said he'll have no concerns "whatsoever" about awarding the contracts to the low bidders if they pass the inspection process.

"Just because you're new doesn't mean you can't be effective and provide quality service," Brown said.

A co-owner of newcomer Conner Towing agreed.

"We're ready to roll," said Kimberly Conner. "It's not like we don't know what we're getting into."

Conner said her company may be new and smaller than others, but it has provided wrecker services successfully for various companies since their inception about two years ago.

"The bigger companies need to give us a chance," she said. "They started out small somewhere."

G & S Towing owner Shea Lebow, 24, said he cut his teeth in the towing industry working for his father when he was younger and opening his own business in the past few years.

"I've got no problem meeting the requirements because I keep my equipment in good condition," Lebow said. "I have highly trained people, and most of my trucks are paid for. ... Everybody's problem is my age."

He said his bids were realistic and the same that Chestnut Street Garage, which has been around for decades, submitted in 2001.

Chestnut Street is one of four companies the city recently accused of overcharging on towing jobs performed on behalf of the city. The companies, which also include Cedar Bluff 24 Hour Towing, Fountain City Wrecker Service and Sutherland Avenue Wrecker Service, are prohibited from bidding on city contracts for the next five years. The companies have denied wrongdoing.

"What I bid is what I charge the general public anyway," Lebow said.

He said if he gets a city contract and "can't hack it," then the city has the right to cancel his contract.

"Give us a chance," he said.

Clark's Towing submitted the lowest bids on two zones, but after considering the size of his business and the demands of handling both contracts, owner Clark Percell said he withdrew his company from consideration from one of those contracts.

"I didn't bite off what I couldn't chew," he said.

But like Carnes, Percell agreed some of the newer companies "don't have a clue what they're in for."

While Percell has operated his own towing business only for about five years, he said he's worked in the industry for 23 years and has seen insurance costs rise and other changes - some good and some bad.

Attorney Michael McGovern, who represents the ineligible companies and whose father previously operated Cedar Bluff 24 Hour Towing, also has argued in recent weeks that dramatic increases in insurance and fuel costs have forced companies to raise their rates.

Percell described his bids as being neither high, nor low.

"You have to bid where you can make a profit," he said.

Mark Williamson, chairman of the Knoxville Wrecker Commission, agreed wrecker companies have to - and should - charge enough to recover their fixed operating costs and make a profit.

"You have to have confidence your bidders know what they're doing," he said.

Williamson pointed out the low bidders submitted bids generally in the same price range.

"That confirms each others' calculations of what it takes to make money," he said.

But he also said what one person says is reasonable differs from what another person says is reasonable.

"It's hard to compare company to company," he said. "Even among the old-line towing companies you can't make generalizations about what one company may need to be profitable. You have to look at each individual company's structure."

Williamson said the "due diligence period" is one the city would go through when awarding any contract.

"This is the process we go through, and the city is not obligated to take the apparent low bidder," he said. "It's obligated to take the most responsible low bidder."

The city is tentatively expected to vote on the contracts at a special city council meeting Dec. 18. The current contracts expire at midnight Dec. 27.

Laura Ayo may be reached at 865-342-6341.


AUDIT SHOWS OVER CHARGES BY TOWING COMPANIES

Reporter: Jim Ragonese WBIR TV
11/24/2003

The amounts some Knoxville towing companies charge could be criminal. The city's law department is now looking through towing records after the wrecker service commission says it found massive over billings by towing companies with city contracts.

The Wrecker Service Commission says with four of five companies under city contract every single invoice audited had problems.

The Wrecker Service Commission says Sutherland Avenue Wrecker service, Cedar Bluff towing, Chestnut Street garage, and Fountain City Wrecker service all overcharged people, and their insurance companies for towing.

The commission believes that shows a pattern of intentional overcharging.

Towing company lawyer Michael McGovern said, "Nobody has been deceived. Nobody has been defrauded with the charges that they've been presented with."

Based on several invoices submitted by the towing companies, the wrecker service isn't convinced.

One Cedar Bluff towing invoice shows a $39 charge. That's the agreed upon rate in the contract for this company on city or police authorized tows.

But the invoice that went to either the car owner or the insurance company, for the same tow, shows a total charge of $578.

Wrecker Service Commission's Mark Williamson said, "They have turned in to the city documentation that was just simply false."

The attorney for the towing companies says the tow truck driver may have started an invoice like that, thinking the tow fell under the terms of the city contract.

If it didn't, he says the company would have later added the appropriate charges for a non contract tow.

The Wrecker Service Commission maintains all those invoices audited fall under the contract rate. If no criminal charges come from this investigation, they may never have to settle the argument. This is because all four towing companies accused of overcharging gave notice that they quit their contracts.

This means that by the end of December the city has to find people capable to tow all cars involved in accidents or illegal parking in Knoxville.


Tow payback urged

Council OKs resolution asking wrecker operators to reimburse for overcharges

By SCOTT BARKER, barkers@knews.com
Knoxville News-Sentinel
November 26, 2003

The Knoxville City Council weighed in on the wrecker controversy Tuesday, voting to ask four tow truck operators to reimburse customers for any overcharges.

The panel voted 7-0, with two abstentions, in a resolution demanding that Cedar Bluff 24-Hour Towing, Sutherland Avenue Wrecker Service, Fountain City Wrecker Service and Chestnut Street Garage pay back money, with interest, to people and insurance companies allegedly overcharged under terms of municipal contracts.

"They've made excuses for it, but the fact is, a contract is a contract," Mayor Victor Ashe said.

The resolution does not compel the companies to comply.

The four companies signed contracts in 2001 to provide towing services on calls generated by city officials, usually by police, in designated geographic areas. In exchange for the exclusive contracts, the companies agreed to charge less than the market rate for those calls. The contracts don't apply to towing jobs arranged by individuals or by private companies.

The companies gave up the contracts, effective in late December, on Oct. 28, after the Knoxville Wrecker Commission scheduled hearings on the matter.

"They knew the rules, and I think they willingly overcharged citizens in this community," Wrecker Commission Chairman Mark Williamson told council members.

Williamson said two companies submitted altered invoices, while another apparently maintains two sets of books.

"Use any term you want," Williamson said, "but fraud is fraud."

Noting that records showed the four companies overcharged in every incident reviewed, Williamson said the firms "engaged in collusion to set prices and overcharge citizens."

Cedar Bluff 24-Hour Towing and Chestnut Street Garage share the same owner.

The firms' lawyer, Michael McGovern, denied his clients did anything wrong. He called the contracts "confusing and ambiguous," and said many calls that appear to fall under the contracts actually don't.

For example, he said, a car that is towed outside the city limits isn't covered by the contract. McGovern also said the companies tow city vehicles for free, which he estimated cost the firms a combined $100,000 per year.

Still, he said, the companies plan to place an advertisement soon in the News Sentinel inviting people who think they've been overcharged to contact them for possible refunds.

"The towing companies have no objections to providing refunds in cases where it might be appropriate," McGovern said.

Councilmen Rob Frost and Mark Brown grilled McGovern about the contracts. Frost questioned why the companies worked under the agreements for two years before deciding the terms were inadequate.

"The more and more I've found out about this, the more reprehensible I've found it," Frost said.

Frost, Brown and council members Joe Hultquist, Barbara Pelot, Ed Shouse, Larry Cox and Vice Mayor Jack Sharp voted in favor of the resolution. Nick Pavlis and Steve Hall abstained.

Brown said the council's Audit Committee, a panel with subpoena powers that he chairs, would review the matter further at a Dec. 4 workshop.

After the meeting, McGovern denied the companies conspired to overcharge customers, noting that the firms charged different amounts on the invoices cited by the city.

"If there was collusion they would have been charging the same price," he reasoned.

Ashe has ordered the Law Department to explore ways to file a class-action lawsuit to recover any overcharges and to compile evidence to turn over to prosecutors for a possible criminal investigation. Law Director Michael Kelley said the administration hasn't determined whether to bar the companies from bidding on future contracts.

Scott Barker may be reached at 865-342-6309.


Ashe scolds wrecker services; seeks refunds for customers

By SCOTT BARKER, barkers@knews.com
Knoxville News-Sentinel
November 25, 2003

Knoxville Mayor Victor Ashe will ask City Council today to seek refunds from wrecker companies found to have overcharged customers.

The panel is to consider a resolution that also formally condemns four companies with city contracts at a special session prior to the council's regularly scheduled meeting.

Ashe called the meeting after the city Wrecker Commission found overfilling by Cedar Bluff 24-Hour Towing, Sutherland Avenue Wrecker Service, Fountain City Wrecker Service and Chestnut Street Garage.

"With the findings of overcharging by four wrecker companies by the city's Wrecker Commission, I think that those companies should immediately begin a program to refund any overcharges to the qualifying citizens of Knoxville," Ashe said in a statement.

According to records released by the city, the wrecker services overcharged insurance companies on calls requested by police.

City contracts give the companies monopolies on police-generated calls in various sectors of the city. In exchange for the monopolies, the companies signed contracts agreeing to charge lower rates. The regulated prices don't apply to privately arranged towing jobs.

"These overcharges hit innocent citizens, and to the degree that these charges are paid for by insurance companies, it may cause an increase in insurance premiums," Ashe said.

"This documented overcharging is reprehensible and predatory, so I am asking City Council to adopt this resolution that calls for immediate restitution of the charges."

Michael McGovern, who represents the four wrecker services, has maintained the companies did nothing wrong.

He could not be reached Monday night for comment regarding Ashe's proposed resolution.

Floyd's Wrecker Service is the only towing company with a city contractor that was found not to have overcharged.

"Floyd's Wrecker Service should be applauded for following the terms of the contract when conducting their business," Ashe said.

Late last week, Ashe asked the city law department to research whether the alleged overcharges constitute criminal violations and turn any evidence over to prosecutors for investigation.

In the meantime, he wants the companies to pay up.

"The best Christmas gift they could give," Ashe said, "is to refund these overcharges."

Scott Barker may be reached at 865-342-6309


Ashe asking council to seek refunds on towing charges

Knoxville News-Sentinel
November 24, 2003

Mayor Victor Ashe will ask City Council on Tuesday to pass a resolution seeking refunds from wrecker companies that overcharged for towing services.

The special council meeting comes after the city Wrecker Commission found overbilling by Cedar Bluff 24-Hour Towing, Sutherland Avenue Wrecker Service, Fountain City Wrecker Service and Chestnut Street Garage.

The wrecker services overcharged insurance companies on calls requested by police.

"With the findings of overcharging by four wrecker companies by the city's Wrecker Commission, I think that those companies should immediately begin a program to refund any overcharges to the qualifying citizens of Knoxville," Ashe said in a statement.

"These overcharges hit innocent citizens, and to the degree that these charges are paid for by insurance companies, it may cause an increase in insurance companies.

"This documented overcharging is represhensible and predatory, so I am asking City Council to adopt this resolution that calls for immediate restitution of the ... charges."

Floyd's Wrecker Service is the only towing company that was found not to have overcharged.

"Floyd's Wrecker Service should be applauded for following the terms of the contract when conducting their business," Ashe said.

Michael McGovern, who represents the four wrecker services, has maintained the companies did nothing wrong.

He could not be reached Monday night for comment regarding Ashe's proposed resolution.


Wrecker fees rile mayor

Ashe tells law director to look into class-action suit against towing companies

By SCOTT BARKER, barkers@knews.com
Knoxville News-Sentinel
November 22, 2003

An angry Mayor Victor Ashe on Friday ordered city lawyers to look into ways to initiate a class-action lawsuit against four towing companies accused of overcharging customers.

A city review of billing records and police reports led the Knoxville Wrecker Commission to allege that Cedar Bluff 24-Hour Towing, Sutherland Avenue Wrecker Service, Fountain City Wrecker Service and Chestnut Street Garage overcharged insurance companies on calls requested by police.

The four companies are under contract to tow wrecked and abandoned vehicles at a low, negotiated price in exchange for exclusive rights to work in various sectors of the city.

Ashe denounced the four companies' billing practices as "predatory" and vowed to help correct past wrongs during his final weeks in office.

"First of all, I think these overcharges, to the degree they've been discovered, are outrageous and reprehensible and certainly represent fraud on the consumer," Ashe said.

Ashe ordered Law Director Michael Kelley to find out if the city can file a class-action lawsuit on behalf of the people and insurance companies who paid more for towing services than allowed under the contracts. He also wants Kelley to determine whether to bar the companies from doing business with the city in the future.

"We need to not only prevent this in the future, but the city needs to take an active role to protect citizens against these predatory practices. I hope to have an answer back before Thanksgiving, and we'll proceed on the basis of that information," Ashe said.

The lawyer for the companies, Michael McGovern, wasn't available for comment Friday afternoon. A woman who answered the phone in his office said he had left for the day and wouldn't return until Monday.

McGovern has consistently maintained the wrecker companies did nothing wrong. He has said the contract prices were too low in light of rising fuel and insurance costs and complained that the Wrecker Commission has been unresponsive to the companies' concerns.

The Wrecker Commission leveled its charges after a spot check found the four companies supplied incorrect or incomplete billing information in 18 of 18 randomly selected incidents.

Records show the companies submitted manifests to the city claiming to have charged the lower rates mandated by the contracts. But they submitted invoices to insurance companies for up to 16 times the amounts reported to the city.

On Oct. 28 the four companies gave the city 60 days' notice that they would terminate their contracts, meaning they'll still be on the job until after Christmas.

A fifth company, Floyd's Wrecker Service, has complied with all the terms of its contract, city officials said, and will keep its contract in effect.

Representatives of insurance companies were guarded in their reaction to the controversy and to Ashe's call for legal action.

Doug Honig, spokesman for Ohio-based Progressive Insurance Co., said his company has helped with the city's probe and will continue providing information when asked.

Records show Cedar Bluff 24-Hour Towing charged Progressive $95 for towing a 1991 Honda Accord on June 6 but submitted documents to the city indicating the charge was $39, the amount stipulated by the contract. Cedar Bluff also failed to report other charges that boosted the total bill sent to Progressive to $578.85.

Honig declined to comment on the possibility of joining a class-action lawsuit, saying, "I'd have to speak to our in-house counsel."

Honig said the company, which has more than 650 independent agents and 150 employees in Tennessee, has run into similar situations in other cities.

In another instance, records released by the city show Chestnut Street Garage charged State Farm Insurance Companies the proper amount - $75 - for towing a 1990 Ford Aerostar van on June 7. However, the bill sent to State Farm totaled $380.90, including costs not disclosed to city officials.

Dustin Miller, a spokesman for State Farm Insurance Companies, said it's difficult to gauge the effect such overcharging has on premium rates.

"If claims costs are lower, it's a major factor in the rate-setting process," Miller said.

The city only regulates prices on calls originated by police officers and other city employees. Privately arranged towing jobs aren't regulated.

Kelley said the city regulates the pricing to prevent gouging in instances when city employees have to make arrangements for towing without a vehicle owners' consent, as when the owner has been taken to the hospital or arrested.

Also, since the companies are assigned specific geographic areas, the arrangement prevents more than one company from responding to crashes.

"Part of what led to this is that police officers would have to referee disputes between wrecker companies at wreck scenes rather than working the wreck," Kelley said. "It helps control an otherwise chaotic situation."

Kelley also said officials might take a look at adopting a stronger ordinance to govern future contracts.

Scott Barker may be reached at 865-342-6309.


Only 1 wrecker firm has county contract

By SCOTT BARKER, barkers@knews.com
Knoxville News-Sentinel
November 22, 2003

While the Knoxville Police Department must follow low-priced contracts when calling for wreckers, it's unclear whether the Knox County Sheriff's Office does.

Knox County government has a contract with Floyd's Wrecker Service, which is the only city-contracted firm not implicated in Knoxville's towing scandal. If county employees call Floyd's Wrecker Service, the company is bound by contract to charge customers $25 - plus mileage if over five miles - for towing cars, trucks and minivans.

Like the city's contracts, the negotiated price is lower than the market rate.

But county departments are free to call on other companies, officials say.

"It's not mandatory that a department use those contracts. They're there for their convenience," Knox County Purchasing Director Hugh Holt said Friday. Still, he added, "It's hard to beat $25."

Though the Sheriff's Office routinely calls towing companies to remove vehicles from wreck sites and crime scenes, county officials don't monitor whether taxpayers benefit from the contracted price.

Holt said the Sheriff's Office uses the Chestnut Street Garage, one of four companies accused of violating city contracts, for at least some towing jobs.

Sheriff Tim Hutchison didn't return calls Friday seeking information about his towing policy; neither did Chief Deputy Dwight Van de Vate nor spokeswoman Martha Dooley.

If the Sheriff's Office has formal agreements with towing companies, the person who handles county contracts isn't aware of it.

"To my knowledge, they don't have a separate contract," said Knox County Purchasing Agent Mike Reeves.

Reeves said the Sheriff's Office is free to use a higher-priced service. Since public money isn't used to pay for towing private vehicles, county departments aren't in danger of exceeding the limit of $10,000 per vendor per year for non-contract services.

County officials said they might audit towing records, but point out that the city didn't find any indication of wrongdoing in its review of Floyd's Wrecker Service manifests.

Scott Barker may be reached at 865-342-6309.


City eyes billings by wreckers

DA will launch probe if warranted; tow firms deny any wrongdoing

By SCOTT BARKER, barkers@knews.com
Knoxville News-Sentinel
November 21, 2003

City officials are reviewing towing records for possible criminal violations after the Knoxville Wrecker Commission alleged that four companies charged too much for towing services.

Insurance companies for motorists stranded in Knoxville paid up to 16 times the amount towing companies claimed on documents submitted to the city, according to records released Thursday.

The records - including crash reports, invoices and manifests - outline a pattern of overcharging that city officials estimate has cost insurance companies thousands of dollars over the past year.

"There was a deliberate effort to deceive the city and the wrecker commission," Chairman Mark Williamson said.

Knoxville Law Director Michael Kelley said the report could become a basis for criminal charges.

"In three of the four cases, there is evidence of fraudulent billing," Kelley said. "We'll be looking at it to see if there's evidence sufficient to turn over to the attorney general for investigation."

Knox County District Attorney General Randy Nichols said he would launch a criminal probe if presented with evidence of a violation of state law.

The lawyer for the four companies - Cedar Bluff 24-Hour Towing, Sutherland Avenue Wrecker Service, Chestnut Street Garage and Fountain City Wrecker Service - has denied any wrongdoing by his clients.

"There was no fraud because the city doesn't pay these bills," Michael McGovern said.

The city's review covered the five companies that have contracts to tow vehicles at the direction of police and other city officials. Only Floyd's Wrecker Service hasn't been implicated in the matter.

The four firms under suspicion gave the city 60-day notices on Oct. 28 that they would give up the lucrative contracts. The city tapped the companies for some 5,000 calls between Jan. 1 and the end of October.

The city's contracts with the wrecker services only regulate prices charged for tows requested by city employees. In exchange for the exclusive contracts, the companies tow city vehicles for free. Each company is assigned a geographic sector of the city.

Police typically will call one of the companies when the owner of a wrecked car is injured or when they come across an abandoned vehicle, Kelley said.

The contracts do not cover towing jobs done at the request of private citizens.

Citizens and insurance companies may call the Knoxville Police Department Inspections Unit at 215-7217 to report suspicious bills, officials said.

All 18 incidents - picked at random by city officials - contained instances of overcharging by the companies.

The records show Cedar Bluff 24-Hour Towing charged insurance companies more than twice the contracted price for initial towing. In addition to charging more than allowed for towing, Chestnut Street Garage charged $20 per day for storage instead of the $13 maximum charge allowed by the city.

In one case, Sutherland Avenue Wrecker Service told city officials it charged $25 for towing a 2001 Pontiac Sunbird on June 27. However, an invoice sent to Verastar of Knoxville, the Sunbird owner's insurance company, lists a towing charge of $150, a storage fee of $240 and a tax bill of $22.50. The total came to $412.20.

Cedar Bluff 24-Hour Towing reported charging $39 to tow a 1991 Honda Accord on June 6 but sent Progressive Insurance Co. a bill for $578.85. The bill included a towing charge of $95, an unspecified charge of $25, a storage fee of $420 and taxes totaling $38.85.

Melissa Peters, internal auditor to Knoxville City Council, conducted the review for the wrecker commission. She said the invoices indicate that Sutherland Avenue Wrecker Service keeps two sets of books and that Chestnut Street Garage and Cedar Bluff Wrecker Service altered their bills.

McGovern, the towing companies' lawyer, said the city's review was incomplete and its sample too small. He maintained the bills reviewed by the city could contain honest mistakes made by employees or were the result of jobs that fell outside the parameters of the contracts.

McGovern said the contracts locked the companies into prices that were too low in light of rising insurance and fuel costs.

Williamson said the firms should have honored their contracts or asked for revisions.

"If they wanted to seek an adjustment to that contract, why didn't they come to commission and request one?" Williamson said.

McGovern countered that the companies have found the commission to be unresponsive and that asking to renegotiate would have been pointless. He said the companies wanted out of the pacts regardless of the city's investigation.

By voluntarily withdrawing, the companies might be allowed to bid on future contracts, though Kelley said city officials could wind up barring them from bidding.

Scott Barker may be reached at 865-342-6309.


Towing Invoice samples

Knoxville News-Sentinel
November 21, 2003

  • Sutherland Avenue Wrecker Service
    6/27 - 2001 Pontiac Sunbird
    City invoice $25
    Insurance invoice (tow only)$150
    Total charges*$412.20
  • Cedar Bluff Wrecker Service
    6/6 - 1991 Honda Accord
    City invoice$39
    Insurance invoice (tow only) $95
    Total charges$578.85
  • Chestnut Street Garage
    6/11 - 1994 Lincoln Continental
    City invoice$75
    Insurance invoice (tow only) $95
    Total charges$355
  • Fountain City Wrecker Service
    6/12 - 1996 Ford Taurus
    City invoice $0**
    Insurance invoice (tow only) $175
    Total charges$371.65
*Total charges could include storage, delivery to other facilities, road service, taxes and "other charges." Every invoice submitted to the city matched the bid rate for towing, but none of them listed the other charges. City officials say every company overcharged for storage. **Fountain City Wrecker Service did not submit an invoice to the city as required by the contract. The maximum towing charge for this incident under the contract is $35.

Source: City of Knoxville


Wrecker charges inflated, city finds

Firms ended contracts after probe began into 'rampant' price gouging

By HAYES HICKMAN, hickman@knews.com
Knoxville News-Sentinel
November 20, 2003

Allegations of "rampant" overcharging by Knoxville tow-truck services have been leveled by the city's Wrecker Services Commission after it found four of the five companies under city contract had charged illegally inflated fees.

The companies, however, scrubbed their contracts with the city last month, before the five-member wrecker commission's Tuesday hearing confirmed the price gouging.

Legal questions still surround whether the four businesses will be allowed to compete when the city rebids the contracts in December.

An attorney for the companies argues that the contracts were flawed and outdated and should be reviewed.

Fountain City Wrecker Service, Sutherland Avenue Wrecker Service, Chestnut Street Garage and Cedar Bluff 24-Hour Towing all gave 60-day notices Oct. 28.

The contracts weren't due to expire until 2004.

The cancellations came immediately after the wrecker commission scheduled formal hearings, which were held Tuesday.

Mark Williamson, Wrecker Commission chairman, said the board investigated allegations of overcharges for three months. While their contracts set price caps of $25 to $75 per tow, depending on the company, the companies charged $125 on average to consumers or their insurance companies, according to a review of the invoices.

"Out of the (invoices) we sampled, every single one resulted in overcharging," Williamson said. "Given that the error rate was 100 percent, I've got to believe that it was rampant."

The five contracted firms answer hundreds of calls for service each month from the city. From January through the end of October, the companies had towed approximately 5,000 vehicles at the city's request.

The commission randomly reviewed four to five invoices from June for each contract. With the exception of Fountain City Wrecker, the other three firms apparently doctored the manifests given to the commission, he said. The discrepancies were not discovered until the panel independently reviewed towing invoices from insurance companies.

"The documentation they sent us indicated compliance," Williamson said.

Fountain City Wrecker, which held contracts for the city's North and Northwest zones, submitted no manifests for June or July as required by the contracts.

Floyd's Wrecker Service in South Knoxville, the smallest of the five firms, was the only business found to be in compliance with the contract.

The review also found overcharging for impound rates, which according to the contracts cannot exceed $13 per day and cannot be charged within the first 48 hours.

Additionally, the commission found inconsistent tax charges on impoundments, other charges added to the initial tows and, in the case of Sutherland Avenue Wrecker, separate manifests that indicated two sets of books.

But the commission's findings did not "go to the heart of the issue," said Michael McGovern, attorney for the four tow services.

"The heart of the issue is the inadequacy of the rates in the contracts," he said.

"Dramatic" increases in insurance and fuel costs have forced the companies to raise their rates - problems that the wrecker commission has been unresponsive to, McGovern said.

"I don't think there's been rampant overcharging," he said. "There's been some mistakes made, and there's been some misinterpretations of the contracts."

McGovern argued that the overcharged rates are still "commercially reasonable" as compared to typical towing fees charged in the county.

Knox County, however, has no similar oversight or contracts with any tow services.

With the contracts now set to expire Dec. 27, Williamson said he expects new contracts to be bid and awarded by then.

Currently, the agreements stipulate that overcharging or other violations could prohibit a tow service from bidding on future contracts for five years.

Whether the companies in question will be allowed to submit new bids is under review, said city attorney Alyson Eberting.

"The city is still looking into what further steps we will take in this matter," she said.

McGovern, whose father, Ben McGovern, founded Cedar Bluff Towing and later sold the business, said he assumes his clients would attempt to re-bid and negotiate an improved rate.

Williamson said such problems could eventually force the city to consider buying its own tow trucks to end its reliance on contract work.

"This is a huge business, and there's a lot of money at stake," he said. "You can see how there could be a lot of abuses."

Hayes Hickman may be reached at 865-342-6323.


KNOXVILLE NEWS-SENTINEL SURVEY RESULTS:

Have you had your car towed and felt you were being overcharged by the wrecker service?

READER COMMENTS:

Choice 1 - "I phoned Chapman Highway Wrecker Service for a tow from West Knoxville to Chapman Highway. They told me they are 'not allowed to tow from that area, since that area is run by Cedar Bluff Towing/Wrecker'. I called CBT and waited 3 hours at night in the freezing cold on Pellissippi Parkway Interstate I-240 (named by Tennessee legislature as "Carl Koella Memorial Highway" in honor of convicted hit-and-run killer Senator Carl Koella). CBT said it was late because it was busy doing nonconsentual towing in downtown Knoxville, which is more profitable than consentual towing. During the tow CBT did $150 damage to my car. Previously, Sutherland Avenue Wrecker confessed to me that CBT and its co-owner Ben McGovern set all towing prices and areas for all tow trucking companies in Knox County." --John Lee, geocities.com/towcrime, November 25, 2003, 5:40 AM

Choice 1 - "My husband and several friends used to work for both Cedar Bluff and Sutherland. And yeah, it happens. Insurance companies get ripped by towing companies. Not just in Knoxville either! Nobody stops to think who's actually paying the" November 22, 2003, 10:49 AM

Choice 1 - "Once on campus, a wrecker operator gave me one price if I paid in cash immediately, OR a higher price if I wrote a check or paid with VISA. I paid with VISA so the slimeball couldn't pocket the dough." November 21, 2003, 3:32 PM

Choice 1 - "You could have written this story anytime in the last 15 years (maybe more), and it would have been just as accurate. This has been a racket for a long time.." November 21, 2003, 11:39 AM

Choice 2 - "BETWEEN INSURANCE,FUEL COSTS & TOWING CITY VEHICLES FOR FREE I FEEL ITS A GOOD DEAL LET CITY PAY FOR TOWING IM SURE PRICES WOULD BE CHEAPER" November 21, 2003, 10:52 AM

Choice 2 - "If you can do it any better and or cheaper and still make positive revenue I guess you need to start your own towing company. JD" November 21, 2003, 5:38 AM

Choice 1 - "sutherland ave wrecker sux balls!" November 21, 2003, 4:17 AM

Choice 2 - "Wrecker Compaines are not gouging people they are simply charging enough money to cover all their expenses like fuel, inusrance, cost of truck, and paying employees." November 20, 2003, 10:18 PM

Choice 2 - "Why pick on wrecker companies, what about gouging by doctors, lawyers, plumbers, electricians, and the list goes on!!!!!" November 20, 2003, 9:56 PM

Choice 2 - November 20, 2003, 9:16 PM

Choice 1 - "Cedar Bluff Towing made me stand in the pouring rain while they robbed me. I went into a restaurant across the street to get change to pay for parking and by the time I came out, they had me hooked up. It was so ridiculous, the restaurant" November 20, 2003, 8:55 PM

Choice 2 - "cedar bluff wrecker was great to me" November 20, 2003, 8:32 PM

Choice 2 - "I just want to say what a great job cedar bluff towing di when i was stranded with my 3 kids and it was nothing but a fair price with great service. Thanks again Cedar Bluff" November 20, 2003, 7:44 PM

Choice 2 - "No price gouging, by Cedar Bluff price was reasonable for amount of time spent while KPD worked my accident" November 20, 2003, 7:43 PM

Choice 2 - "I found Cedar Bluff to be polite and reasonable when I needed help." November 20, 2003, 7:34 PM

Choice 2 - "Anyone who thinks that they can park uptown for free day or night needs to be towed and charged $90+. Don't expect anything for free and you don't have to worry about being gouged." November 20, 2003, 7:00 PM

Choice 2 - "Ftn City towed my car from Ftn City to Maryville and only charged me 60.00, which i thought was reasonable." November 20, 2003, 5:45 PM

Choice 1 - "Cedar bluff charged me $75 for a 3 mile. Clinton Hwy seems honest." November 20, 2003, 5:17 PM

Choice 1 - "My car was stolen. When it was found I had to pay a ridiculous tow and storage fee. Robbed twice!" November 20, 2003, 5:12 PM

Choice 1 - "Charged $60 to have my car towed less than 1 mile." November 20, 2003, 4:49 PM

Choice 2 - "please keep this conf. but i was the former manager of cedar bluff before roadone sold the company to randy hinton please contact me at rogle@knology.net i signed the last contract for cedar bluff in 2002." November 20, 2003, 3:24 PM

Choice 1 - "Who cares, there are queers getting married and we are talking about towing. HELP." November 20, 2003, 3:23 PM

Choice 1 - "Charged 90 dollars for tow and 22 dollars a day starting onthe day of tow." November 20, 2003, 3:04 PM

Choice 1 - "It was very unfair because they had not properly posted "no parking" signs in the correct place, they told me it was in a certain location, but the company had placed the sign behind a trashcan out of view of me and any other person wanting" November 20, 2003, 3:03 PM

Choice 2 - "I guess it would depend on why you are being towed. If parked illegal and come out to your car and its gone no matter what you were charged your going to think it was to expensive. My Scenario was a little different, my wife and 6 kids were" November 20, 2003, 2:51 PM

Choice 1 - "It is unbelievable how bad the towing services are and how much they overcharge. They are honestly some of the most unfriendly people I have ever encountered. Especially Sutherland Ave towing and Cedar Bluff." November 20, 2003, 1:39 PM

Choice 1 - "$90 at UT" November 20, 2003, 12:53 PM

Choice 1 - "it is a scam" November 20, 2003, 12:46 PM

Choice 1 - "I was charged $75.00 for a tow and it took them over two hours to get to me, and I had two small children!!!!" November 20, 2003, 12:20 PM

Choice 1 - "None of them should be allowed to ever have another contract with the city." November 20, 2003, 12:11 PM

Choice 1 - "99.9% of all wrecker services are nothing short of thieves!" November 20, 2003, 12:08 PM

Choice 1 - "I can tell you that if Floyd's was found in compliance they must have doctored their records. When they towed my car after an accident, my insurance company begged me to get my personal belongings out of the totaled car as soon as possible" November 20, 2003, 12:00 PM

Choice 1 - "I was charged $125.00 plus $20.00 storage fee from 5:30 pm to 6:30 pm by CLARK'S TOWING from Home Federal Bank" November 20, 2003, 11:58 AM

Choice 1 - "Cedar Bluff also does damage to private property while they gouge." November 20, 2003, 11:55 AM

Choice 2 - "Why don't you verify all of your facts before you blow things way out of proportion. Talk to other wrecker commissioners besides Williamson. Get all the facts!!" November 20, 2003, 11:46 AM

Choice 1 - "Cedar Bluff towing was about to tow my car away for being parked illegally at Wendy's on Cumberland Ave,while I was inside nightclub. Driver told me I could give him $60.00 bucks now to let my car down, or $125.00 later,if he had to tow it" November 20, 2003, 11:07 AM

Choice 2 - "HAY! Dat gotta HEMI?!?" November 20, 2003, 10:20 AM

Choice 1 - "cedar bluff stated when questioned why the bill was so high for a tow charge of $247.00 for a 5 mile tow, their response was that the insurance company was paying for the tow and not the customer. that is what they get from the insurance" November 20, 2003, 10:13 AM

Choice 1 - "All of them have a serious reputation for gouging and unethical conduct. Where are the criminal charges? Not in Knoxville..." November 20, 2003, 10:08 AM

Choice 1 - "Cedar Bluff" November 20, 2003, 10:03 AM

Choice 1 - "$250.00 - towed less than 10 miles by Cedar Bluff Towing." November 20, 2003, 10:02 AM

Choice 1 - "Cedar Bluff runs a racket. They're vultures. One night they parked in my private parking lot looking for cars to tow next door. I called Floyd's (a fair towing service) and asked if they would tow a tow truck. Alas, they would not. I" November 20, 2003, 9:55 AM

Choice 1 - "Cedar Bluff Towing is the worst. Nasty rednecks stalking vehicles to tow." November 20, 2003, 9:29 AM

Choice 1 - "Cedar Bluff took advantage of me during a time when I needed help." November 20, 2003, 9:27 AM

Choice 2 - "Floyds, the smallest of the companies but the only one in compliance, should be given an exclusive contract. Reward companies that play by the rules!" November 20, 2003, 9:18 AM

Choice 1 - "Cedar Bluff Wrecker Service" November 20, 2003, 9:13 AM

Choice 2 - "Ftn City Wrecker Service towed our car and was very reasonable, and efficient. I would use them again." November 20, 2003, 8:58 AM

Choice 1 - "Yes from the Worlds Fair Park. They way overcharged and I had to get a ride to Pellissipi Parkway. It was $90 in 1996" November 20, 2003, 8:54 AM

Choice 1 - "My Corvette broke down less the 4 miles from my house.I was charged over $80.00 to load it up and take it home." November 20, 2003, 8:49 AM

Choice 1 - "Good Heavens yes." November 20, 2003, 8:33 AM

Choice 2 - "I recently had my truch wenched out of a ditch and was charged $45. That was about what I expected it to cost. When you factor in travel time and all the other expenses incurred by the wrecker company, the charge was fairly reasonable." November 20, 2003, 8:23 AM

Choice 1 - "I was out of state." November 20, 2003, 8:07 AM

Choice 1 - "From UT area in my child's parking lot. Sutherland did it" November 20, 2003, 7:46 AM

Choice 1 - "The "fleecing" of UT students has been going on for years! I had an experience with Cedar Bluff towing service as a student in the early 90's and I was charged a rate similar to that quoted in the article!" November 20, 2003, 7:39 AM


TOWING WARS: Ex-towing contractor tries to muscle in

Unauthorized wrecker turns up at crash site soliciting business

By SCOTT BARKER, barkers@knews.com
Knoxville News-Sentinel
December 30, 2003

The first day a new batch of wrecker services began towing vehicles for the Knoxville Police Department, one of the new contractors got into a dispute with a former contractor's driver who showed up at a crash scene to solicit business.

According to Knoxville police officer Phil Major, the confrontation occurred after a three-car collision Sunday at the intersection of Merchant Drive and Central Avenue Pike.

Rick Carnes, owner of Clinton Highway Wrecker Service, showed up at the scene shortly after 7 p.m. to find two trucks belonging to Fountain City Wrecker Service already there.

According to Carnes, the driver of one of the Fountain City Wrecker Service trucks had asked the driver of one of the damaged vehicles for business. However, Clinton Highway Wrecker Service had replaced Fountain City Wrecker Service at midnight as the contractor for the area.

"It got a little heated. There were a few words exchanged between the driver and myself. I told him we weren't going to sit back and let this happen," Carnes said.

A call to Fountain City Wrecker Service seeking comment wasn't immediately returned.

Carnes said the Fountain City Wrecker Service driver hauled one vehicle a short distance away and repaired a damaged tire. The motorist then drove away.

A second vehicle wasn't damaged enough to need towing, Major said, but Carnes' company hauled the third vehicle, which allegedly caused the crash, to the city's impound lot. Its driver had fled the scene.

Major said police officers are supposed to control access to crash scenes and prevent business solicitation while sorting out what happened. Officers may cite anyone, including tow truck drivers, Major said, who doesn't follow an officer's orders at a crash scene.

"It's going to be left up to the officer. He's going to have to make a determination about who should be there and who shouldn't be there," Major said.

Carnes agreed, saying it could take police issuing citations to stop the practice of showing up at wrecks to solicit business.

"If (police) do their job, we won't have to argue on the scene," Carnes said.

Carnes noted that city contracts stipulate that only contracted firms can enter a wreck scene area unless called by one of the people involved in the collision.

Five new companies are working wrecks for Knoxville police after city officials alleged four firms, including Fountain City Wrecker, overcharged customers in violation of their contracts. The contracts, which set a guaranteed price for work in assigned geographic areas, only apply to calls made by police. They don't cover privately arranged jobs.

The city alleges Fountain City Wrecker Service, Cedar Bluff 24-Hour Towing, Sutherland Avenue Wrecker Service and Chestnut Street Garage charged customers more than allowed under the contracts. The city sued all but Fountain City Wrecker for submitting false documents. The companies have denied any wrongdoing in the matter.

Scott Barker may be reached at 865-342-6309.


CONTROVERSY SURROUNDS TOW TRUCK CONTRACTS

Reporter: Marc Stewart
WBIR TV
12/29/2003

A battle is brewing between the Knoxville companies that tow wrecked cars, and it may end up costing the consumers.

The city of Knoxville has contracts with towing companies to help clear accident scenes. Recently the city terminated some of those agreements after allegations some of the companies were bilking drivers.

Four towing companies lost their contracts with the city after a spot inspection revealed they were overcharging drivers whose cars need to be towe4d.

Now four new companies have taken over, but there are charges at least one of the old companies is still responding to accident scenes, trying to take the business.

John Carnes' company Clinton Highway Wrecker won the contract with the city.

Carnes says one of his competitors still isn't playing by the rules. The company made a complaint with Knoxville Police on Sunday against Fountain City Wrecker.

That company recently lost its city contract.

Carnes claims the company showed up to an accident scene, even though it wasn't called.

Companies can learn of an accident by listening to a police scanner. Under city code, only wreckers that have been called by the police department can show-up to a scene.

Officers will soon be reminding the companies of the rules.

The city awards bids to wrecker companies to protect consumers. If a non-approved wrecker tows your car, that company can charge you whatever it wants.

Knoxville Police Officer Phil Major said, "people involved in a traffic accident are shaken up, going to be taken advantage of."

It is up to each individual officer to decide if an unauthorized wrecker must leave the scene of an accident.

According to the police department, if a wrecker doesn't leave an accident scene after an officer makes a request the tow truck driver can be cited for failing to obey an order. However, this has not happened yet.


Power granted to get records

Council gives subpoena authority to wrecker panel for towing companies

By SCOTT BARKER, barkers@knews.com
Knoxville News-Sentinel
December 10, 2003

The Knoxville City Council granted subpoena authority to the Wrecker Commission on Tuesday, allowing the panel to demand records from four towing companies accused of overcharging customers.

The Wrecker Commission has been investigating the companies since the summer. The subpoena power would force the firms to submit documents for review.

"We would use it only if necessary," Wrecker Commissioner Jean Teague said.

Council passed the emergency measure unanimously.

Earlier in the evening, city officials briefed the Knoxville Audit Committee on the matter, though the committee likely won't use its subpoena power to join the fray because the city has sued three of the firms.

"The lawyers need to start handling it now," Audit Committee Chairman Mark Brown said at the conclusion of an hour-long briefing on the controversy Tuesday.

City officials say the companies filed false or altered manifests to cover up systematic overcharging.

The briefing brought one new allegation to light. Knoxville police say Sutherland Avenue Wrecker Service took three vehicles involved in a crash last weekend to the company's lot instead of hauling them to the city impound lot as evidence.

The owner of one vehicle went to the lot before police knew where they were. As a result, any evidence contained in the vehicles could be compromised if criminal charges are levied in the incident, officials said.

"There's going to be a 48-hour break in the chain of evidence," said Audit Committee member Rob Frost, a practicing lawyer.

Knoxville Police Officer Jason Booker of the Inspections Division said such lapses are rare.

"It's not frequent, but it does happen," Booker said.

The lawyer representing Sutherland Avenue Wrecker Service and three other companies accused of overcharging on towing jobs done on behalf of the city said he couldn't comment on the incident.

"I'm not familiar with that situation at all," Michael McGovern said.

McGovern represents Sutherland Avenue Wrecker Service, Cedar Bluff 24-Hour Towing, Fountain City Wrecker Service and Chestnut Street Garage. The city alleges the companies overcharged individuals and insurance companies for towing jobs made at the request of city police.

The city had awarded contracts to the companies giving them exclusive rights to towing jobs in designated sectors of the city. In exchange for the guaranteed work, the firms agreed to charge below-market-value rates on the tows.

The contracts don't cover privately arranged towing jobs such as the removal of cars at the request of business owners.

The city filed two lawsuits Thursday against three of the firms. The lawsuits charge the companies with breach of contract and violation of the Tennessee False Claims Act.

Fountain City Wrecker Service wasn't sued because the firm didn't submit documents to the city as required by the contract, officials said.

The companies have denied any wrongdoing in the matter. McGovern said he's drafting the companies' legal response and wouldn't comment further on the litigation.

In October, the companies withdrew from the contracts, effective Dec. 27. City officials say they haven't received any documentation from the companies since July.

Bids for new wrecker contracts are due to be opened today, and Mayor Victor Ashe has said he would call a special City Council meeting to consider them before he leaves office Dec. 20.

Scott Barker may be reached at 865-342-6309.


TOW CRIMES

"Knoxville must be the most corrupt city on Earth.... [On City Council with mayor Ashe] I really felt I was in the presence of evil."
—City Councilor Carlene Malone

whose father was an NYPD homicide detective, to this webmaster, summer 2000, and Metro Pulse, after her 2 cars were arsoned for investigating the scrap-metal industry and prior to her suing the Skull & Bones mayor Victor Ashe and City Council for holding illegal Top Secret meetings

Evil "Knox commissioners defeat God resolution."
Knox News Sentinel - 11/18/2003 (destroying 10 Commandments and US and state Constitutions, elevating government to god status for aethiest-Jewish communists in New World Odor and its United Nations Corporation UNESCO Biosphere Reserve forclosure of 90% of USA and Great Smokey Mountain National Park, and to implement Satanic Jewish Talmudic law of zero ethics and One World Religion HQed in Israel - Do KC commissioners fear going to Hell for putting murder contracts on each other?)

"My job was to root out and investigate police corruption, and criminals who've infiltrated the police department.... Sure I went after other policemen. After other policemen that were criminals who happened to join the police department. There were drug dealers, murderers, rapists. These are the types of policemen that I went after. The general public should know there are real, serious criminals in the police department. I don't believe that it should be hidden. Let the policemen know that someone they worked with was a murderer, or a drug dealer."
—Detective Vincent Murano, NYPD Internal Affairs, from his book and book-on-tape, Cop Hunter

"Officers of the court have no immunity, when violating a Constitutional right, from liability. For they are deemed to know the law."
Owen v. Independence, 100 S.C.T. 1398, 445 US 622

"When a judge acts where he or she does not have jurisdiction to act, the judge is engaged in an act or acts of treason."
U.S. V. Will, 449 Us 200,216, 101 S Ct, 471, 66 LEd2nd 392, 406 (1980) Cohens v. Virginia, 19 Us (6 Wheat) 264, 404, SLEd 257 (1821)

"The cost for initial tow destination is governed by city contract between the towing company and the City of Knoxville. Currently, the charges for this initial tow range between $0.0 and $25. AT ANY TIME YOU HAVE THE RIGHT TO REQUEST THE ASSISTANCE OF A POLICE OFFICER."
Motorists Bill of Rights, City of Knoxville Municipal Corporation Law Department, March 24, 2000

"The above vehicle was towed to our storage facility on 1-15-00. As of the date of this letter, the accumulated charges on this vehicle total $753.62."
Yvonne Mullins, Sutherland Avenue Wrecker Service Inc., February 23, 2000, first notice to vehicle owner John Lee, of vehicle ordered towed by KPD without a parking ticket from owner's private property, then listed as stolen by KPD in FBI's NCIC computer database [ 1 I 2 ]. Upon inspection by owner, it was reported to KPD that the CD player and speakers were stolen [ 1 I 2 ]. As of March 2002, total tow bill exceeds $13,000.

"Maybe you can go over there in Federal Court and prove to somebody that they violated your Constitutional rights, but that's not going to work here. Counsel has moved to strike a lot of these things in this counterclaim. They appear to me to be, they don't appear to me to be relevant to anything we've got to deal with, whether you were violating the City ordinance for dealing with parking."
—Judge Wheeler Rosenbalm, Knox County Circuit Court, Motion Hearing, City of Knoxville Municipal Corporation versus John D. Lee II, August 24, 2001

"We've traded our 10 Commandments for the ten planks of the Communist Manifesto."
—Alex Jones, Infowars.com, WBCR 1470AM, Alcoa, Tennessee

"Confiscation of property of all emigrants and rebels."
The Communist Manifesto, 4th Plank

"This morning, 100 tow trucks will go forth from Philadelphia City Hall to begin a task that sounds almost biblical in scale. Every day for the next 40 days, the city will tow 1,000 abandoned cars from city streets and have most of them crushed into metal cubes. The goal is loftier than simple retribution against errant car owners. 'These cars have become the symbol of everything that is bad and threatening to a neighborhood,' says Mayor John Street, whose 1999 election campaign centered on a $250 million plan to clean up the blight of abandoned buildings and vehicles. Since the early '90s, a change in philosophy and policy has led local authorities across the USA to attack such signs of urban decay as a cause -- not effect -- of rising crime and declining neighborhoods. 'People have finally understood that you can't wait for crime to happen. You have to go after the causes of crime,' says George Kelling, a Rutgers University criminologist. Fixing Broken Windows, a book by Kelling and co-author Catherine Coles, became a bible for New York City's 'zero-tolerance' policy toward abandoned cars, abandoned buildings and even graffiti. The city towed 36,000 cars last year. City lots and junkyards were filled with wrecks while the paperwork necessary to destroy the cars became stuck in bureaucracy. Chief Inspector Richard Bullick, head of the city's automotive services bureau, says Philadelphia's high auto insurance rates lead some people to buy cheap cars, drive them unregistered and uninsured, then abandon them at the first sign of legal or mechanical trouble. 'It's disposable transportation,' says Bullick, whose department receives 5,000 calls a month about abandoned cars. But Philadelphia is far from alone. Falling scrap metal prices -- $1.85 per hundred pounds, down from $4 a few years ago -- have made salvage companies reluctant to take junk cars. As a result, cities including New Orleans, Denver and Pittsburgh have run out of space to store them. Legal issues also have slowed the process. When Oakland began towing abandoned cars from crime-ridden neighborhoods two years ago, city officials were hit with lawsuits from private citizens and the American Civil Liberties Union. The plaintiffs claimed that the city violated civil rights by the illegal seizure of the cars. The glut of cars in some cities also has made private tow companies reluctant to put the cars on their own lots. The private haulers rely on fines and towing and storage charges paid by car owners. But when a car goes unclaimed, the tow company is stuck with a vehicle of little value. In some cities, including Pittsburgh and Salt Lake City, tow operators have refused to haul abandoned cars. Philadelphia, which also uses private tow companies, hopes to avoid that problem by promising the companies $15 for each car towed during the 40-day period. While Kelling lauds the abandoned-car programs in Philadelphia and other cities, he says they should go one step further. 'In addition to towing them, it would be worthwhile to find out why these cars are being abandoned,' he says. 'As far as a problem-solving process, it would seem to be a good thing to know.'"
—Meridith Vieira, WATE, USA Today, "War on an eyesore that wrecks city life Philadelphia starts 40-day towing effort," posted 2003

"Government control of Communications and Transportation."
The Communist Manifesto, 6th Plank

"At about the same time that Hegel was passing from the scene, Karl Marx caught the revolutionary fever. He drew heavily from Hegel (the dialectic) and Feuerbach (materialism). Around the turn of the century there was a growing trend within this movement that a better way to change the world is not abruptly and violently at the point of a bayonet, (traditional Marxist revolution), but rather it should be done slowly and incrementally by transforming individuals and their cultural institutions. Then you can control a country as effectively as if you conquered it militarily. In fact, this method is preferred because one does not have to rebuild bombed out cities and dig all those mass graves! Your local beat cop has a special part to play, and he doesn't even realize it. Not only has Total Quality Management (TQM) change agents restructured many of the police departments in America, they are now in a position to turn the police themselves into the facilitators of the community through a program called COPs, or Community Oriented Policing. COPs is a federally funded program administered through the U.S. Department of Justice. What is COPs? The most succinct definition I found was in a DJ brochure: 'COMMUNITY POLICING WHAT IS IT? Shift in philosophy about police duties vs. community responsibilities to a team concept of TOTAL QUALITY MANAGEMENT of the community. Reidentifying the police role as a FACILITATOR in the community.' Translation: 'Transformation from a constitutionally empowered local police force performing their duty to keep the peace to that of a change agent working within the community to affect a Marxist paradigm shift.' Formerly, the police administrators were accountable to the elected officials who were accountable to the voters (representative democracy). This new paradigm that Trojanowicz describes is exactly what Marxist George Lukacs termed 'participatory democracy' and is nothing more than the Soviet style council. When Lenin was consolidating the Bolshevik revolution, he wrote how he would implement the communist bureaucracy without hardcore Marxist believers. While the elite rulers of his inner circle understood the structure he was building, Lenin said he would exploit the natural vanity and ambition of people to forward his agenda without them knowing what they were really doing. Eager to gain his favor and to enhance their political careers, they would fall all over themselves trying to promote his agenda. He called these types of people "Useful Idiots." Before you brand every police officer you see as an undercover Marxist, understand that most of them comprehend little of what they are participating in. In reality, most officers intuitively know that something is wrong in their organization, but they play the game rather than risk damaging their career. Sadly, they constitute a vast army of 'useful idiots.' The terms 'communism', 'socialism', 'Marxism', 'New World Order' etc., may be worn out and abandoned. The names change, because deception is one of the rules of the game. Many erroneously believe that the cold war is over and that we actually won. But the revolution is still very much alive and America is losing."
—Detective Phillip Worts, San Diego Police Department, "Community Oriented Policing" (COPS)

"Dumb cops, dumb cops, whatcha gonna do, whatcha going to do with a low IQ?"
—Jay Leno (comedic Italian-American, motorhead collector, biker gangster, and rider of a 266MPH street-legal jet-engined All-American sportbike), NBC TV, Tonight Show [Low IQ is useful for crooked politicians looting $70-Trillion/year from all police and government pension "slush" funds (CAFRs). Net profits from CAFR investments can eliminate homicidal and illegal police quotas for arrests and citations and noncon towing, and eliminate ALL forced taxation of US citizens, such as the voluntary federal income tax and Social Security Ponzi scheme (none has ever been paid to US government - it all goes outside USA to Puerto Rican IRS), sales taxes and property taxes.]

"You will be happy to learn that the former head of the KGB (the secret police of the former Soviet Union), General Yevgeni Primakov, has been hired as a consultant by the US Department of Homeland Security. Do you think he will share his expertise in "security" to prepare US citizens for domestic internal passports under the pretense of fighting the never-ending "War on Terrorism"? This is a new division, referred to as the Office of Internal Security, which is coordinating the effort to establish citizen threat files on every US citizen. It will be a huge database including credit files, medical files, political and religious affiliation, military history, attendance at anti-government rallies,etc. What I liked about this segment is that they interviewed General Yevgeni Primakov, who is now a consultant to the Department of Homeland Security along with General Alexander Karpov. Primakov was laughing about it because he's getting paid a big fee to do it. He doesn't care, of course. Primakov speaks beautiful English, as you would expect a former head of the KGB to do. When the NICA (National Identity Card Act) gets passed, the Posse Comitatus Act gets overturned (which repealed Martial Law after the US Civil War for New World Odor Jewish banksters), a few other pieces of legislation yet to be proffered get passed, the White House will have more control over the American people than the Kremlin had over the Russian people when Stalin was alive. He said that and then he laughed. What Primakov finds funny are what he calls these "right wing flag wavers" that were so anti-communist and now they're supporting a state policy of internal passports. The irony is deafening. Old right wing farts -- turn up your hearing aids for the irony is deafening. It has been reported that Nikita Krushchev Jr works for the Heritage Foundation. Another right wing foundation has Elena Stalin. The Old Soviet Brand names are all coming to Washington to get on the gravy train and teach the Bush administration how to further restrict the rights of the American people. And Primakov is waiting for the USSA, The United Soviet States of America. It'll probably make him feel right at home."
—Al Martin, Behind the Scenes in the Beltway, "Get Ready for the USSA (The United Soviet States of America)," March 17, 2003

"Mr. Dodd, we operate here at the Ford Foundation under directives which emanate from the White House…We operate and control our grant-making policies…as follows: We shall use our grant-making power so as to alter life in the United States that it can be comfortably merged with the Soviet Union."
—Rowan Gaither, president of the Ford Foundation, reported by Professor Texe Marrs, PhD, USAF (retired), "AmeriRus", Power of Prophesy Radio News, WBCR 1470AM, Alcoa, Tennessee

"If you understood what Communism was, you would hope and pray on your knees that we would someday become Communist."
—Jane Fonda, Hollywood acress, wife of CNN News/Time Warner/AOL/Atlanta Braves chairman Ted Turner, in a speech to Duke University students in 1970

"It is necessary secretly - and urgently - to prepare the Terror. What we need is more Red terror. More and more and more. Put more force into the terror!"
—Vladimir Lenin, Jewish Bolshevik Communist dictator of Soviet Russia, letters to the Chairman of the Council of People's Commissars (Richard Grenier, The Washington Times, "Vladimir Lenin as Genghis Khan," October 8, 1996; Dr. Texe Marrs, The Power of Prophesy, "Gulag USA: Concentration Camps in America," December 2002; Dr. Texe Marrs, Power of Prophesy, "Legacy of the Illuminati: Revolution of Blood," January 2001)

Good news: Motorcycle riders lawfully allowed to run red lights, orders Tennessee legislature, 2003 - Chapter No. 266 (SB 1200/HB 1054), T.C.A. § 55-8-110, Effective date: July 1, 2003; and it's now easier to get a criminal arrest warrant or criminal summons for towcrime (Chapter No. 366 (SB 1344/HB 1293), T.C.A. § 40-6-205 et seq.); (but lots of bad news for everybody else, such as 21 year old adults unconstitutionally banned from transporting alcohol (T.C.A. § 57-3-412(a)(3)(A)), and allows underage adults to help Prohibition Revenooers entrap Tennesseans (Chapter No. 198 (SB 550/HB 847)) T.C.A. § 39-15-413(a)); unconstitutional blanket search warrants to enter your house can be issued by any gov't employee without a court or judge's order (Chapter No. 326 (SB 1728/HB), T.C.A. Title 68, Chapter 120, Part 1); County magistrates may carry guns (Chapter No. 144 (SB 29/HB 63), T.C.A. §§ 39-17-1315 and 1308 - but this is good because Constitutional Equal Protection doctrine allows citizens the same rights to self defense as government employees); moonlighting cops can wear police uniforms off duty to confuse the public in Davidson and Rutherford Counties, but not Knox County (Chapter No. 222 (SB 430/HB 610), T.C.A. § 62-35-141(b)); expansion of Tennessee's current Internet ISP tax to include Internet sales tax (Chapter No. 357 (SB 899/HB 832), as currently allowed by US Congress.

KNOXVILLE'S $7-BILLION TOWCRIME TIES TO TERRORIST MASSACRES ON SEPTEMBER 11, 2001

WHAT WILL YOU DO WITHOUT FREEDOM?

  • "THE MOST CORRUPT CITY ON EARTH" WITH "EVIL" MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL ACCORDING TO CITY COUNCIL
  • HOME OF THE $375/DAY PARKING TICKET, $25,000 TOWING BILL, VEHICLE FORFEITURES FOR PARKING IN YOUR OWN DRIVEWAY
  • TOP SECRET COURT DOCKET FOR 75,000 ANNUAL KPD PARKING TICKETS
  • HQ OF $40-BILLION WORLD-WIDE CARTEL OF NUKE WASTE, TOW-TRUCKING, GARBAGE-TRUCKING & CAR THEFT
  • EPA RANKED #1 WORST AIR IN USA 2001
  • DOE RANKED #1 WORST NUKE DUMP ON PLANET EARTH
  • GARBAGE CARTEL TIED TO TERRORISM COVER-UPS AT OK CITY & NY CITY
  • $40 BILLION CARTEL'S 25 MAFIA EMPLOYEES CONVICTED IN NYC BY RICO ACT
  • SKULL & BONES MAYOR THAT WORSHIPS NAZIS, SLITS WOMEN'S THROATS AND WORSHIPS SATAN & RITUAL CHILD SACRIFICE AT HOMOSEXUAL BOHEMIAN GROVE PRESIDENTIAL RETREAT
  • SCARAB SECRET SOCIETY AT UT BEGET "THE FIRM" - OWNED BY AMBASSADOR HOWARD BAKER - THAT DEFENDS LOCAL TOWING CARTEL
  • NEWS SENTINEL FRONT PAGE REPORTED SHERIFF STOLE CARS AT WESTTOWN MALL WITH CONVICTED COP KILLER
  • METROPULSE COVER STORY REPORTED WESTTOWN & EASTTOWN MALLS OWNED BY MAFIA - METROPULSE REPORTER APPARENTLY MURDERED ONE WEEK LATER
  • WHERE SUCCESSFUL JOURNALISTS CARRY UZI MACHINE GUNS TO PUT HIT MEN IN THEIR PLACE
  • DRUG DEALING HIT MEN EMPLOYED BY POLICE AS "INFORMANTS" WITH IMMUNITY FROM PROSECUTION
  • MAYOR, POLICE CHIEF & DISTRICT ATTORNEY DROP CHARGES AGAINST CONFESSED DRUG DEALING COP KILLERS - DA RUNS FOR GOVERNOR
  • LOCAL ARAB BUSINESS OWNERS UNDER INDICTMENT FOR THEFT & MONEY LAUNDERING OR BILLION DOLLAR CONTRACTORS SUSPECTED OF ARSON ARE MAGNET FOR LOCAL, STATE & NATIONAL REPUBLICAN POLITICIANS
  • MOONSHINING GOVERNOR'S & USA'S BIGGEST CONVICTED FELON SENATOR IN DOWNTOWN STATE OFFICE BUILDING EMPLOYED ILLEGAL IMMIGRANT FROM NEW YORK CITY AS ILLITERATE SECURITY GUARD - UPDATE - GUARD QUIT & MOVED BACK TO NEW YORK CITY & SECURITY INCREASED ONE WEEK AFTER THIS WEBSITE'S REPORT - SKULL & BONES MAYOR ASHE WAS TRYING TO TEAR DOWN THAT BUILDING FOR YEARS AND HATES WORLD'S FAIR SUNSPHERE & REFUSES 100,000 TOURISTS EVERY YEAR
  • KNOXVILLE AND UT ARE HOME TO THE FAMILY BUSINESS OF CONTROLLED DEMOLITION INC - FROM ENEMY OF THE STATE, THAT SPECIALIZES IN KNOCKING DOWN PERFECTLY GOOD SKYSCRAPERS FOR US GOVERNMENT, PENTAGON, HOLLYWOOD AND MAFIA GAMBLING CASINO HOTELS, THAT KNOCKED DOWN THE OKLAHOMA CITY FEDERAL BUILDING AND BURIED IT IN A LANDFILL OWNED BY KNOXVILLE TOWING AND GARBAGE CARTEL BROWNING-FERRIS INDUSTRIES (BFI) AND MILLER INDUSTRIES AND ROADONE TOWING, WITH 25 CONTRACTORS CONVICTED FOR MEMBERSHIP IN GAMBINO AND GENOVESE MAFIAS IN NEW YORK CITY. CDI ALSO DEMOLISHED THE WORLD TRADE CENTER AFTER THE 9-11-2001 MASSACRE. VIEW VIDEO CLIPS OF CDI BOMBINGS. AS SEEN ON THE HISTORY CHANNEL - DEMOLITIONS WITH HOST ALICE "WELCOME TO MY NIGHTMARE" COOPER
  • KNOXVILLE IS ONLY CITY ON PLANET TO NUKE ANOTHER CITY AS TERRORISTS INFILTRATE USA WITH RUSSIAN SUITCASE NUKES - PENTAGON CONFESSED PENTAGON PLOT TO HIJACK US AIRLINERS & BLOW UP WASHINGTON DC - PRESIDENTS BUSH CONFESSED BILLION DOLLAR BUSINESS PARTNERSHIPS WITH BIN LADENS
  • CITY, UNIVERSITY & STATE GOVERNMENTS STEAL SECRET PROFITS FROM WALL STREET INVESTMENTS AS PROVEN IN THEIR CAFR'S AS PUERTO RICAN IRS STEALS GREAT SMOKEY MOUNTAINS PARK & $1.5 BILLION DOLLARS EVERY DAY FOR PRIVATE FED RESERVE BRITISH BANKERS
  • US CONSTITUTION BANNED BY SUPREME COURT FOR PAST 70 YEARS - REPLACED BY UNIFORM COMMERCIAL CODE UNDER MARTIAL LAW IN BANKRUPTCY COURT - BRITISH AMERICAN BAR ASSOCIATION LAWYERS, JUDGES & POLITICIANS SWORN TO SECRECY
  • MULTINATIONAL LOCAL NEWS MEDIA GETTING RICH OFF GOVERNMENT BRIBES TO KEEP TALKING HEADS SILENT
  • DISABLED GULF WAR VET WEBMASTER CONVICTS DRUG DEALING GOVERNMENT HIT MAN WITH FALSE PASSPORT EMPLOYED AS INFORMANT BY US DEA
  • PATROL CAR TAKEN FROM KPD COP AFTER 4 CRASHES REVEALED IN PREVIOUS TRAFFIC TICKET APPEAL BY WEBMASTER
  • COURT CLERK FIRED FOR THEFT & EXTORTION IN WEBMASTER'S APPEAL OF PARKING TICKET
  • WEBMASTER SUES 2 CLASS ACTIONS AGAINST MAYOR, KPD & MAFIA FOR RACKETEERING & ORGANIZED CRIME AFTER